Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship of Cob characters with Grain Morphology in Maize (Zea mays, Poaceae)

Beziehungen zwischen Charakteristiken des Maiskolbens und der Morphologie des Maiskorns.

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Twenty varieties of maize (Zea mays, Poaceae) were studied through 11 attributes in three to seven randomly selected plants of each variety with a view to understanding the effect of cob characters on technologically desirable grain qualities. Canonical discriminant analysis showed thatproductivity (determined by total grain weight/cob, cob diameter and average grain weight) was the most discriminating among varieties followed by round grains fraction (represented by whole top and middle flat grains, number of rows and grain count/surface area), middle flat grains (composed of middle flat grains and grain count/surface area) and shape of the cob (determined by shape index, total grain weight/cob and cob diameter), which accounted for 35.1, 18.3, 12.2, and 9.8% of the total variance, respectively. In the light of these results, tentative norms have been suggested to evolve maize varieties of superior technological properties and yet retain high productivity. A cylindrical cob of large diameter with highest number of grains/area and smallest possible number of rows together constituted an ideal combination to achieve the objectives. Such possibilities in the light of available information are discussed.

Zusammenfassung

Man hat 11 Charakteristiken (oder Eigenschaften) von 20 Maisarten (Zea mays, Poaceae) mittels 3–7 zufällig gewählter Pflanzen jeder Art studiert. Das Ziel war zu einem Verständnis der Wirkung von Kolbencharakteristiken auf die technologisch wünschbaren Korneigenschaften zu gelangen. Eine kanonische Diskriminantenanalyse zeigte, dass Produktivität (bestimmt mit Hilfe von Korngewicht/ Kolben, Kolbendurchmesser, und mittlerem Korngewicht) war höchst diskriminant; nächst kamen, der Reihe nach, die Rundkornfraktion (durch ganze Ober- und Mittelkörner, Reihenanzahl, und Anzahl von Körnern pro Flächeneinheit dargestellt), flache Mittlerekörner (bestehend aus flachen Mittlerekörnern und Körneranzahl/Flächeneinheit) und Kolbenform (mittels Formindex, gesamtes Körnergewicht/Kolben, und Kolbendurchmesser bestimmt); die obigen Parameter stellen 35.1, 18.3, 12.2, bzw. 9.8% der gesamten Varianz dar. Aus diesen Messungen ist man zum Schlusse gekommen, dass ein zylindrischer Kolben mit der grössten Körneranzahl pro Flächeneinheit, und möglichst kleinen Reihenanzahl, eine ideale Kombination darstellt. Verschiedene Möglichkeiten werden im Lichted dieser Kenntnisse diskutiert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • AOAC. 1980. Official method of analysis. 13th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC. [Method 14.004]

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, W. W., and P. R. Lohnes. 1971. Multivariate data analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duvick, D. N. 1986. Plant breeding: past achievements and expectations for the future. Econ. Bot. 40:289–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, D., and T. H. Thomas. 1982. Seed germination and seedling emergence as influenced by the position of development of the seed on, and chemical applications to, the parent plant. Pages 81–110in A. A. Khan, ed., The physiology and biochemistry of seed development, dormancy and germination. Elsevier Biomedical Press, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, W. H., and J. H. Martin. 1963. Cereal crops. Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narasimha, H. V., M. K. Bhashyam, G. N. Raju, S. Sreedhara Murthy, and T. Srinivas. 1987. Effect of size and shape on milled product quality in maize. Poster paper (No. QAC 19) presented in VII Indian Convention of Food Scientists and Technologists, Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pe’, E., E. Ottoviano, and A. Camussi. 1982. Structural analysis of relationships between ear and plant traits in maize. Maydica 27:41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeranz, Y., C. R. Martin, D. D. Taylor, and F. S. Lai. 1984. Corn hardness determination. Cereal Chem. 61:147–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Z. Czuchajowska, and F. S. Lai. 1986. Gross composition of coarse and fine fractions of small corn samples ground on the Stenvert hardness tester. Cereal Chem. 63:22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, G. F. 1955. Corn and corn improvement. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S.A. 1987. Structure and composition. Pages 53–82in S. A. Watson and P. E. Ramstad, eds., Corn chemistry and technology. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuber, M. S., and L. L. Darrah. 1987. Breeding, genetics and seed corn production. Pates 31–51in S. A. Watson and P. E. Ramstad, eds., Corn chemistry and technology. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, MN.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Srinivas, T., K. Bhashyam, M., Chand, N. et al. Relationship of Cob characters with Grain Morphology in Maize (Zea mays, Poaceae). Econ Bot 45, 503–510 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02930714

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02930714

Key Words

Navigation