The rise (or fall) of lottery adoption within the logic of collective action: Some empirical evidence
- 55 Downloads
This paper builds upon previous work on the economics of lottery adoption by incorporating the collective action logic developed in an important series of works by Mancur Olson. Public choice research points out that legislators are rational maximizers, and act within a costbenefit framework in attempting to implement means of budget finance. Discrete-time hazard models presented suggest that lottery adoption is more likely to occur in older states where rent seeking groups are older and more organized, and can more effectively engage in efforts for collective action (and benefits). By implementing lotteries as taxshifting mechanisms, the role of, government and the direction of social evolution are also altered.
KeywordsCollective Action Important Series Single Cross Section State Lottery Local Debt
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Brinner, R.E. and C.T. Clotfelter. (1975) “An Economic Appraisal of State Lotteries,”National Tax Journal 32: 543–548.Google Scholar
- Filer, J.E., D.L. Moak, and B. Uze. (1988) “Why Some States Adopt Lotteries and Others Don’t,”Public Finance Quarterly 16: 259–283.Google Scholar
- Lipford, Jody and Bruce Yandle. (1990) “Exploring Dominant State Governments,”Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 146: 561–575.Google Scholar
- Livernois, J.R.. (1987) “The Redistributive effects of Lotteries: Evidence from Canada,”Public Finance Quarterly 15: 339–351.Google Scholar
- Olson, M. (1988) “The Productivity Slowdown, the Oil Shocks, and the Real Cycle,”Journal of Economic Perspectives 2: 43–69.Google Scholar
- — (1982)The Rise and Decline of Nations, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- — (1965)The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar