Skip to main content
Log in

International maritime transport and climate policy

  • Environment
  • Published:
Intereconomics

Abstract

The contribution of international maritime transport to anthropogenic climate change has so far attracted little attention. This may be expected to change in the near future due to both ongoing research and the political processs. The present article looks at the relevant trends in international maritime transport and discusses both the greenhouse gas emissions from shipping and the possible repercussions of climate change on shipping. It concludes with an overview of policies and measures that should be implemented to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions from shipping in a cost-efficient way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Of 150 sources cited in the transport chapter of IPCC’s Second Assessment Report (Laurie Michaelis: Mitigation options in the transportation sector, in: Robert Watson, Marufu Zinyowera, Richard Moss (eds.): Climate change 1995: impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: scientific-technical analyses, Cambridge 1996, pp. 681–712), only three mention shipping and none of them concentrates on greenhouse gas emissions.

  2. Venugopalan Ittekot: Oceans, in: Robert Watson, Marufu Zinyowera, Richard Moss (eds.), op. cit., Climate change 1995: impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: scientific-technical analyses, Cambridge 1996, pp. 269–288, here p. 274.

  3. Laurie Michaelis: Special issues in carbon/energy taxation: marine bunker fuel charges, Annex I, Expert Group to the UNFCCC Working Paper No. 11, Paris 1997.

  4. OECD: Competitive advantages obtained by some shipowners as a result of non-observance of applicable international rules and standards, Paris 1996.

  5. H. E. Haralambides: Introduction: A Synthesis, in: H. E. Haralambides (ed.): Quality Shipping, Market Mechanisms for Safer Shipping and Cleaner Oceans, Rotterdam 1998, pp. XVII–XXXVIII.

  6. G. Nieuwpoort, E. L. M. Meijnders: The integration of economic and safety policy for shipping: The need for self-organisation, in: H. E. Haralambides (ed.), op. cit., Quality Shipping, Market Mechanisms for Safer Shipping and Cleaner Oceans, Rotterdam 1998, pp. 191–216.

  7. TUMPA—Turkish Marine Pilots Association: Calculations, based on reports of the UN Conference on Environment and Development, 2000, URL http://www.turkishpilots.org/marinecare/marinecare.html, accessed Jan. 13, 2000.

  8. Barry Huebert: Sulphur emissions from ships, in: Nature, 400, 1999, pp. 713–714.

  9. Per Kågeson: Economic instruments for reducing emissions from sea transports, Air Pollution and Climate Series No 11 / T & E Report 99/7, Solana 1999.

  10. IEA: CO2 emissions from fuel combustion 1972–1995, Paris 1997, p. I.14.

  11. Umweltbehörde Hamburg: Luftreinhaltung in Hamburg 1982–2000, Hamburg 1997.

  12. Umweltbehörde Hamburg, op. cit. Luftreinhaltung in Hamburg 1982–2000, Hamburg 1997.

  13. Venugopalan Ittekot, op. cit. Oceans, in: Robert Watson, Marufu Zinyowera, Richard Moss (eds.), op. cit., Climate change 1995: impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: scientific-technical analyses, Cambridge 1996,

  14. Cited in Michael Scott: Human settlements in a changing climate: impacts and adaptation, in: Robert Watson, Marufu Zinyowera, Richard Moss (eds.), op. cit., Climate change 1995: impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: scientific-technical analyses, Cambridge 1996, pp. 401–426, here p. 418.

  15. Venugopalan Ittekot, op. cit.,Oceans, in: Robert Watson, Marufu Zinyowera, Richard Moss (eds.), op. cit., Climate change 1995: impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: scientific-technical analyses, Cambridge 1996, p. 275.

  16. Venugopalan Ittekot, op. cit., Oceans, in: Robert Watson, Marufu Zinyowera, Richard Moss (eds.), op. cit., Climate change 1995: impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: scientific-technical analyses, Cambridge 1996, p. 282.

  17. A leading example in the transport sector is Green Cargo, developed by the SJ Cargo Group, a subsidiary of SJ (Swedish Railways). One element in the concept to promote environmentally sound transport, is an overview of the specific emissions of the consumer (http://www.greencargo.com).

  18. Laurie Michaelis: Mitigation options in the transportation sector, op. cit., in: Robert Watson, Marufu Zinyowera, Richard Moss (eds.): Climate change 1995: impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: scientific-technical analyses, Cambridge 1996, p. 693.

  19. Laurie Michaelis: Special issues in carbon/energy taxation: marine bunker fuel charges, op. cit., Special issues in carbon/energy taxation: marine bunker fuel charges, Annex I, Expert Group to the UNFCCC Working Paper No. 11, Paris 1997. p. 25 f.

  20. Germany: Second national communication to the UNFCCC, Bonn 1997.

  21. OECD: Understanding between DNMEs and OECD member countries on principles to be adhered to in international maritime transport, Paris 1999.

  22. G. Nieuwpoort, E. L. M. Meinders, op. cit. The integration of economic and safety policy for shipping: The need for self-organisation, in: H. E. Haralambides (ed.), op. cit., Quality Shipping, Market Mechanisms for Safer Shipping and Cleaner Oceans, Rotterdam 1998,

  23. OECD: Competitive advantages obtained by some shipowners as a result of non-observance of applicable international rules and standards, op. cit. Paris 1996.

  24. IMO: Draft resolution on sulphur content monitoring, MEPC 43/10/1, New York 1999.

  25. IMO: Prevention of air pollution from ships, Progress report on follow-up activities, MEPC 43/10/2, New York 1999.

  26. U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change: National Communications: Communications from parties included in Annex I to the Convention: Guidelines, Schedule and Process for Consideration: Addendum; Detailed Information on Electricity Trade and International Bunker Fuels, UNFCCC/SBSTA/1996/Add.2, Bonn 1996.

  27. Per Kågeson, op. cit. Economic instruments for reducing emissions from sea transports, Air Pollution and Climate Series No 11 / T & E Report 99/7, Solana 1999.

  28. G. Nieuwpoort, E. L. M. Meinders, op. cit. The integration of economic and safety policy for shipping: The need for self-organisation, in: H. E. Haralambides (ed.), op. cit., Quality Shipping, Market Mechanisms for Safer Shipping and Cleaner Oceans, Rotterdam 1998, pp. XVII–XXXVIII.

  29. M. Zachcial, B. Volk, A. Hader: Incentive-based instruments for environmentally acceptable sea transportation, Bremen/Hamburg 1999.

  30. Laurie Michaelis: Special issues in carbon/energy taxation: marine bunker fuel charges, op. cit. Laurie Michaelis: Special issues in carbon/energy taxation: marine bunker fuel charges, Annex I, Expert Group to the UNFCCC Working Paper No. 11, Paris 1997.

  31. The shipowners evaded the tax by fuelling in Panama. The tax was rescinded in late 1992 (Laurie Michaelis: Special issues in carbon/energy taxation: marine bunker fuel charges, op. cit., Special issues in carbon/energy taxation: marine bunker fuel charges, Annex I, Expert Group to the UNFCCC Working Paper No. 11, Paris 1997. P. 40).

  32. Laurie Michaelis: Special issues in carbon/energy taxation: marine bunker fuel charges, op. cit., Special issues in carbon/energy taxation: marine bunker fuel charges, Annex I, Expert Group to the UNFCCC Working Paper No. 11, Paris 1997. p. 31.

  33. Det Norske Veritas: Technical report World Bank—ILUMEX lessons learned, Report 99–3287, revision No. 01, Oslo 1999.

  34. Per Kågeson, op. cit. Economic instruments for reducing emissions from sea transports, Air Pollution and Climate Series No 11 / T & E Report 99/7, Solana 1999.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Michaelowa, A., Krause, K. International maritime transport and climate policy. Intereconomics 35, 127–136 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02927198

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02927198

Keywords

Navigation