Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evidence of effective multidisciplinary treatment for resectable pancreatic cancer from the viewpoint of the CA19-9 level

  • Published:
International journal of pancreatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Nineteen patients with resectable pancreatic cancer have been treated by a multidisciplinary approach at the National Cancer Center Hospital. This therapy included extended pancreatic resection, intraoperative irradiation by 30 Gy of electrons, and intraoperative hepatic arterial or portal infusion of mitomycin C. Furthermore, postoperative chemotherapy with mitomycin C, using Seldinger's method or iv administration, was added. The study consisted of 13 patients with carcinoma of the pancreatic head and six patients with carcinoma of the body and tail. The one- and three-year survival rates for these patients were 88 and 50%, respectively. The five-year survival rate was calculated as 28%, although there is only one five-year survivor. The effectiveness of this therapy was studied by changes in Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level. Thirteen of the 15 patients with high CA19-9 levels showed a decrease to a level < 50 U/mL after this therapy. In the postoperative course, the patients showing a tendency of elevation of the CA19-9 level could be suspected of having cancer recurrence at this time without any physical sign or other laboratory findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ozaki H, Hojo K, Kato H, Kinoshita T, Egawa S, Kishi K. Multidisciplinary treatment for resectable pancreatic cancer. Int. J. Pancreatol. 1988; 3: 249–260.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ozaki H, Kinoshita T, Kosuge T, Egawa S, Kishi K. Effectiveness of multimodality treatment for resectable pancreatic cancer. Int. J. Pancreatol. 1990; 7: 195–200.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. International Union Against Cancer: TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 4th ed. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Seldinger SI. Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography: A new technique. Acta Radiol. 1953; 39: 368–376.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1958; 53:457–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Oohashi K, Takagi K. ERCP and imaging diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterological Endoscopy. 1980; 22: 1493–1495.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kaiser MH, Ellenberg SS. Pancreatic cancer: adjuvant combined radiation and chemotherapy following curative resection. Arch. Surg. 1985; 120: 899–903.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group: Further evidence of effective adjuvant combined radiation and chemotherapy following curative resection of pancreatic cancer. Cancer 1987; 59: 2006–2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brooks JR, Brooks DC, Levine JD. Total pancreatectomy for ductal cell carcinoma of the pancreas. Ann. Surg. 1989; 209: 405–410.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Moosa AR, Scott MH, Lavelle-Jones M. The place of total and extended total pancreatectomy in pancreatic cancer. World J. Surg. 1984; 8: 895–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ozaki, H., Kinoshita, T., Kosuge, T. et al. Evidence of effective multidisciplinary treatment for resectable pancreatic cancer from the viewpoint of the CA19-9 level. Int J Pancreatol 9, 159–163 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02925592

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02925592

Key Words

Navigation