Abstract
Urinary water and solute excretion before and for 40 minutes after intravenous bolus injection of a nonionic (iopamidol) or an ionic medium (sodium meglumine diatrizoate) have been studied in subjects with normal renal function. Iopamidol produced less urinary losses of water, potassium, sodium, and chloride than did diatrizoate; uric acid excretion was also less enhanced. Surprisingly, both contrast agents produced a comparable increase in urinary pH and bicarbonate excretion. These data show that nonionic agents produce fewer changes in urinary excretion of water and solutes; the less enhanced excretion of uric acid after a nonionic medium may be an important reason to choose the latter agents for urography in patients at risk for urate neophropathy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Davidson AJ:Radiology of the Kidney. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders 1985, p. 681
Higgins CB: Effects of contrast materials on left ventricular function.Invest Radiol 15(suppl):220–231, 1980
Higgins CB, Gerber KH, Mattrey RF, Slutsky RA: Evaluation of the hemodynamic effects of intravenous administration of ionic and nonionic contrast materials.Radiology 142:681–686, 1982
Winfield AC, Dray RJ, Kirchner FK Jr., Muhletaler CA, Price RR: Iohexol for excretory urography: a comparative study.AJR 141:571–573, 1983
Salvesen S: Local toxicity of metrizamide on intravascular injection. Effect on kidney, liver and blood-brain barrier.Acta Radiol (Suppl)335:166–174, 1973
Khoury GA, Hopper JC, Varghese Z, Farrington DK, Dick R, Irving JD, Sweny P, Fernando ON, Moorhead JF: Nephrotoxicity of ionic and non-ionic contrast material in digital vascular imaging and selective renal arteriography.Br J Radiol 56:631–635, 1983
Webb JAW: The effect of intravenous contrast medium on glomerular filtration rate.Br J Radiol 57:387, 1984
Spataro RF, Fischer HW, Boyland L: Urography with lowosmolality contrast media; comparative urinary excretion of iopamidol, hexabrix and diatrizoate.Invest Radiol 17:494–500, 1982
Evill CA, Benness GT: Solute excretion during intravenous urography.Invest Radiol 10:552–556, 1975
Evill CA, Benness GT: Urographic excretion studies with metrizamide and “dimer”: a high dose comparison in dogs.Invest Radiol 12:169–174, 1977
Wilcox J, Evill CA, Sage MR, Benness GT: Urographic excretion studies with nonionic contrast agents.Invest Radiol 18:207–210, 1983
Liddle L, Seegmiller JE, Laster L: Enzymatic spectrophotometric method for determination of uric acid.J Lab Clin Med 54:903–913, 1959
Snedecor GW, Cochran WG:Statistical Methods (6th ed.) Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1967
Orloff J, Berliner RW: Renal physiology. InHandbook of Physiology. Washington: American Physiological Society, 1973, p. 1003
Goodman LS, Gilman A:The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 5th ed. New York: Macmillan, 1975, p 809
Mathisen O, Raeder M, Kill F: Mechanism of osmotic diuresis.Kidney Int 19:431–437, 1981
Postlethwaite AE, Kelley WN: Uricosuric effect of radiocontrast agents. A study in man of four commonly used preparations.Ann Intern Med 74:845–852, 1971
Skeith MD, Healey LA, Cutler RE: Urate excretion during mannitol and glucose diuresis.J Lab Clin Med 70:213–220, 1967
Mudge GH: Nephrotoxicity of urographic radiocontrast drugs.Kidney Int 18:540–552, 1980
Webb JA, Reznek RH, Cattel R, Kelsey FRY I: Renal function after high dose urography in patients with renal failure.Br J Radiol 54:479–483, 1981
Kjellstrand CM, Berkseth RO, Abraham PA: Renal damage induced by radiology contrast media. InNephrology: Proceedings of the IX th International Congress of Nephrology. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1985, p 835
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garibotto, G., Saffioti, S., Garlaschi, G. et al. Comparative effects of nonionic (iopamidol) and ionic (sodium and meglumine diatrizoate) contrast media for urography on urinary excretion of water and solutes. Urol Radiol 8, 199–203 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02924105
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02924105