Abstract
The accuracy of prospective diagnosis of functional adrenal disorders by computed tomography (CT) was evaluated in 65 patients strongly suspected of having such disorders. Thirty-seven patients also underwent adrenal venography and selective adrenal venous sampling. Of the 65 patients, 21 had a hyperfunctioning cortical adenoma, 25 had cortical or medullary hyperplasia, and 11 pheochromocytoma, while 10 had no functional adrenal disease. Diagnosis by CT alone was correct in 66%; diagnosis by CT and venous sampling was correct in 89%. Incorrect prospective CT diagnosis resulted most often from a normal appearance of functionally hyperplastic glands (9 cases), nodular hyperplasia simulating a focal adenoma (8 cases), or an incidental nonfunctioning mass (3 cases). This study emphasizes the need to correlate CT findings with biochemical evaluation and the usefulness of venous sampling in selected cases to avoid inappropriate surgery. When CT is interpreted in correlation with complete biochemical analysis, correct diagnosis can usually be made. A small number of cases may still require adrenal venous sampling.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Korobkin M, White EA, Kressel HY, Moss AA, Montagne JP: Computed tomography in the diagnosis of adrenal disease.AJR 132:231–238, 1979
Dunnick NR, Korobkin M: Computed tomography of the adrenal gland hypertension.Urol Radiol 3:245–248, 1982
Dunnick NR, Doppman JL, Gill JR, Strott CA, Keiser HR, Brennan MF: Localization of functional adrenal tumors by computed tomography and venous sampling.Radiology 142:429–433, 1982
Bravo EL, Tarazi RC, Dustan HP, Fouad FM, Textor SC, Gifford RW, Vindt DG: The changing clinical spectrum of primary aldosteronism.Am J Med 74:641–651, 1983
Adams JE, Johnson RJ, Rickards D, Isherwood I: Computed tomography in adrenal disease.Clin Radiol 34:39–49, 1983
Abrams HL, Siegelman SS, Adams DF, Sanders R, Finberg HJ, Hessel SJ, McNeil BJ: Computed tomography versus ultrasound of the adrenal gland: a prospective study.Radiology 143:121–128, 1982
Welch TJ, Sheedy PF II, vanHeerden JA, Sheps SG, Hattery RR, Stephens DH: Pheochromocytoma: value of computed tomography.Radiology 148:501–503, 1983
Geisinger MA, Zelch MG, Bravo EL, Risius BF, O’Donova PB, Borkowski GP: Primary hyperaldosteronism: comparison of CT, adrenal venography, and venous sampling.AJR 141:299–302, 1983
White EA, Shambelon M, Rost CR, Biglieri EG, Moss AA, Korobkin M: Use of computed tomography in diagnosing the cause of primary aldosteronism.N Engl J Med 303:1503–1507, 1980
Huebener KH, Treugut H: Adrenal cortex dysfunction: CT findings.Radiology 150:195–199, 1984
Neville AM, O’Hare MJ:The Human Adrenal Cortex. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1982, pp 125–129
Glazer HS, Weyman PJ, Sagel SS, Levitt RG, McClennan BL: Nonfunctioning adrenal masses: incidental discovery on computed tomography.AJR 139:81–85, 1982
Mitnick JS, Bosniak MA, Megibow AJ, Naidich DP: Nonfunctioning adrenal adenomas discovered incidentally on computed tomography.Radiology 148:495–499, 1983
Oliver TW Jr, Bernardino ME, Miller JI, Mansour K, Greene D, Davis WA: Isolated adrenal masses in non-small cell brochogenic carcinoma.Radiology 153:217–218, 1984
Francis IR, Glazer GM, Shapiro B, Sisson JC, Gross BH: Complementary roles of CT and131I-MIBG scintigraphy in diagnosing pheochromocytoma.AJR 141:719–725, 1983
Glazer GM, Woolsey EJ, Barrella J, Francis IR, Aisen AM, Bookstein F, Amendola MA, Gross MD, Bree RL, Martel W: Adrenal tissue characterized using MR imaging.Radiology 158:73–79, 1986
Falke THM, Strake LT, Shaff MI, Sandler MP, Kulkarni MV, Partain CL, Nieuwenhuizen-Kruseman AC, James AE Jr: MR imaging of the adrenals: correlation with computed tomography.J Comput Assist Tomogr 10:242–253, 1986
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kenney, P.J., Streeten, D.P. & Anderson, G.H. Difficulties in the prospective diagnosis of functional adrenal diseases by CT. Urol Radiol 8, 184–189 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02924102
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02924102