Abstract
Since image contrast in urinary tract proton magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) depends on both intrinsic properties of the imaged tissue and the imaging technique, it is important to understand the principles underlying image production, both while performing urinary tract MRI and when interpreting the images. This paper reviews briefly the major characteristics of tissue that can produce image contrast: mobile proton density, tissue motion, and relaxation times. It also describes the principles by which these factors, together with the choice of pulse sequence, affect image appearance. The specific pulse sequences described include the spin-echo and inversion recovery sequences; the influence of repetition time, echo delay, and inversion time are also described. Although empiric data regarding the best pulse sequences to use for all types and sites of pathology in the urinary tract are not complete, knowledge of the characteristics of normal tissue and the major sorts of pathologic change permit one to make general conclusions about the appropriate choice of pulse sequences.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bakker CJG, Briend J: Multi-exponential water proton spinlattice relaxation in biological tissues and its implications for quantitative NMR imaging.Phys Med Biol 29:509–518, 1984
Bottomley PA, Foster TH, Argersinger RE, Pfeifer LM: A review of normal tissue hydrogen NMR relaxation times and relaxation mechanisms from 1–100 MHz: dependency on tissue type, NMR frequency, temperature, species, excision, and age.Med Phys 11:Jul/Aug, 425–448, 1984
Brasch RC, Wesbey GE, Gooding CA, Koerper MA: Magnetic resonance imaging of transfusional hemosiderosis complicating thalassemia major.Radiology 150:767–771, 1984
Dooms GC, Hricak H, Sollitto RA, Higgins CB: Lipomatous tumors and tumors with fatty component: MR imaging potential and comparison of MR and CT results.Radiology 157:479–483, 1985
Fisher MR, Hricak H, Crooks LE: Urinary bladder MR imaging: Part 1. Normal and benign conditions.Radiology 157:467–470, 1985
Grodd Von W, Schmitt WG: Proton relaxation relationships of human and animal tissues in vitro. Changes due to autolysis and fixing.Fortschr Rontgenstr 139:233–240, 1983
Hamlin DJ, Ackerman N, Kaude JV, Fitzsimmons JR, Gaskin JM: Magnetic resonance imaging of renal abscess in an experimental animal model.Acta Radiol Diagn.26:315–319, 1984
Herfkens R, Davis P, Crooks L, Kaufman L, Price D, Miller T, Margulis AR, Watts J, Hoenninger J, Arakawa M, McRee R: Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of the abnormal live rat and correlations with tissue characteristics. Work in progress.Radiology 141:211–218, 1981
Hricak H, Alpers C, Crooks LE, Sheldon PE: Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis: Initial experience.AJR 141:1119–1128, 1983
Hricak H, Williams RD, Moon AA, Moss AA, Alpers C, Crooks L, Kaufman L: Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of the kidney: Renal masses.Radiology 147:765–772, 1983
Hricak H, Tscholakoff D, Heinrichs L, Fisher MR, Dooms GC. Reinhold C, Jaffe RB: Uterine Leiomvomas: Correlation of MR, histopathologic findings, and symptoms.Radiology 158:385–391, 1986
Hricak H, Terrier F, Demas B: Renal allografts: Evaluation by MR imaging.Radiology 159:435–441, 1986
Leung AWL, Bydder GM, Steiner RE, Bryant DJ, Young IR: Magnetic resonance imaging of the kidneys.AJR 143:1215–1227, 1984
London DA, Davis PL, Williams RD, Crooks LE, Sheldon PE, Gooding CA: Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of induced renal lesions.Radiology 148:167–172, 1983
Mallard J: The noes have it! Do they?Br J Radiology 54:831–849, 1981
Moon, Jr. KL, Hricak H, Crooks LE, Gooding CA, Moss AA, Engelstad BL, Kaufman L: Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of the adrenal gland: A preliminary report.Radiology 147:155–160, 1983
Smith FW: Two years’ clinical experience with NMR imaging.Applied Radiology:May/June, 29–42, 1983
Poon PY, McCallum RW, Henkelman MM, Bronskill MJ, Sutcliffe SB, Jewett MA, Rider WD, Bruce AW: Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate.Radiology 154:143–149, 1985
Strich G, Slutsky RA: Nuclear magnetic resonance tissue analysis of acute renal artery and renal vein occlusion: the effect of a paramagnetic contrast agent.J Urol 136:1216–1219, 1984
Terrier F, Hricak H, Revel D, Alpers C, Bretan P, Ehman RL, Feduska NJ: Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of acute renal allograft rejection and its differentiation from acute tubular necrosis. Experimental study in the dog.Invest Radiol 20:617–625, 1985
Young IR, Bailes DR, Burl, Collings AG, Smith DT, McDonnell MJ, Orr JS, Banks LM, Bydder GM, Greenspan RH, Steiner RE: Initial clinical evaluation of a whole body nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) tomograph.J Comput Assist Tomogr 6:1–18, 1982
Yuasa Y, Kundel H: Magnetic resonance imaging following unilateral occlusion of the renal circulation in rabbits.Radiology 154:151–156, 1985
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Newhouse, J.H. Image contrast and pulse sequences in urinary tract magnetic resonance imaging. Urol Radiol 8, 120–126 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02924095
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02924095