Skip to main content
Log in

Ius erat in armis: The roman and spanish empires and their discontents

  • Review Articles
  • Published:
International Journal of the Classical Tradition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliography

  1. See, for example, Charles S. Maier’s thoughtful endeavor in comparative history,Among Empires. American Ascendancy and Its Predecessors (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2006), and Harold James,The Roman Predicament: How the Rules of International Order Create the Politics of Empire (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See for a concise dismissal of such loose description of the United States as an empire, Alexander J. Motyl’s "Empire Falls," a review of Craig Calhoun, Frederick Cooper and Kevin W. Moore (eds.),Lessons of Empire: Imperial Histories and American Power (New York: The New Press, 2006), and Charles S. Maier,op. cit., inForeign Affairs 85, 4 (2006): 190–194.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See, for example, Lewis Hanke,Aristotle and the American Indians (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1959); Brian Tierney, "Aristotle and the American Indians—again,"Cristianesimo nella storia 12 (1991): 295–22.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Iglesias,Columbus, Cortés, and Other Essays (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1969), 48.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See for an excellent treatment of Vázquez’ political and legal thought Annabel Brett,Liberty, Right and Nature. Individual Rights in Later Scholastic Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 165–204

    Google Scholar 

  6. Silvio Zavala,Las instituciones jurídicas en la conquista de América, 3rd ed. (México: Editorial Porrúa, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Domingo de Soto,Relección "De Dominio," ed. Jaime Brufau Prats (Granada: Universidad de Granada, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  8. see Werner Goez,Translatio imperii: ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des Geschichtsdenkens und der politischen Theorien im Mittelalter und in der frühen Neuzeit (Tübingen: Mohr, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  9. See the classic article by P.A. Brunt, "Lex de Imperio Vespasiani,"The Journal of Roman Studies 67 (1977): 95–116, esp. 110ff.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. see the survey by David Johnston, "The General Influence of Roman Institutions of State and Public Law," in D. L. Carey Miller and R. Zimmermann (edd.),The Civilian Tradition and Scots Law. Aberdeen Quincentenary Essays (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1997), 87–101.

    Google Scholar 

  11. see Edward Keene,Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), esp. 120ff.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See for the Stoic and Ciceronian influence Richard Sorabji, "Just War from Ancient Origins to the Conquistadors’ Debate and its Modern Relevance," in id. (ed.),The Ethics of War (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006), 13–29; id.,Animal Minds and Human Morals. The Origins of the Western Debate, Cornell Studies in Classical Philology 54 [The Townsend Lectures] (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993), 135ff.

    Google Scholar 

  13. see James E. G. Zetzel, "Natural Law and Poetic Justice: A Carneadean Debate in Cicero and Virgil,"Classical Philology 91 (1996): 297–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. see B. Straumann, "‘Ancient Caesarian Lawyers’ in a State of Nature: Roman Tradition and Natural Rights in Hugo Grotius’De iure praedae,"Political Theory 34, 3 (2006): 328–350; id.,Hugo Grotius und die Antike. Römisches Recht und römische Ethik im frühneuzeitlichen Naturrecht, Studien zur Geschichte des Völkerrechts 14 (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author, Global Research Fellow and Alberico Gentili Fellow at New York University School of Law, would like to thank Ossai Miazad and Jascha Preuss for their editorial help.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Straumann, B. Ius erat in armis: The roman and spanish empires and their discontents. Int class trad 13, 597–607 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02923029

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02923029

Keywords

Navigation