Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

The argument of this article is that, once one tries to interpret the Homeric poems, major deities like Athena will invite allegorical readings and that, in fact, Athena in theOdyssey should be seen as polyvalent. A close reading of the initial discussion between Athena and Telemachus reveals three distinct functions of the goddess, which carry over into other scenes: her psychological role as prudence, especially when one considers Telemachus and his development towards manhood; her function as familydaimon or goddess of the household, when one wishes to understand why she intervenes when she does; and finally the military goddess, when one realizes what her true intent had been throughout the poem. The scholiasts provide support for all three interpretations but especially stress the first. These interpretations also appear in the work of modern academics, both critics and historians of religion. They show that the scholiasts, who do not show how they came to their interpretations, and modern scholars who are more explicit and certainly hold different assumptions and have different methodologies, nevertheless, have provided accounts for these same three roles of Athena in the poem. They show that the scholiasts were not erratic readers of the poem. I simply present their readings, but the claim for polyvalency is my own.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • James B. Pritchard, ed.,Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament, 2nd edition (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  • John Bennet, “Homer and the Bronze Age,”, inA New Companion to Homer, ed. Ian Morris and Barry Powell, Mnemosyne Suppl. 163 (Leiden & New York: Brill, 1997) pp. 511–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Félix Buffière,Les mythes d’Homère et la pensée grecque, ser. Collection d’études anciennes (Paris: Société d’édition “Les Belles Lettres,” 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter Burkert,Greek Religion, trans. John Raffan (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenny Strauss Clay,The Wrath of Athena: Gods and Men in the “Odyssey” (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dante Alighieri,Purgatorio, trans. with a commentary by Charles S. Singleton, 2 vols., Bollingen Series 80 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Susan Deacy, “Athena and Ares: War, Violence and Warlike Deities,” inWar and Violence in Ancient Greece, ed. Hans van Wees (London: Gerald Duckworth & Company and The Classical Press of Wales, 2000) pp. 285–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre Demargne, “Athena,”Lexicon iconographicum mythologiae classicae, vol. II, i, 955b–1044a (Zürich: Artemis, 1984). The plates are in II, ii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm Dindorf,Scholia Graeca in Homeri Odysseam ex Codicibus Aucta et Emendata, 2 vols. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1855).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmut Erbse, ed.,Scholia Graeca in Homeri Hiadem, 5 vols. (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co., 1969–77).

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrew Ford,Homer: the Poetry of the Past (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. C. L. Gibson, ed.,Canaanite Myths and Legends, 2nd edition (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark Ltd., 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heraclitus,Allégories d’Homère, ed. & trans. Félix Buffière, ser. Collection des universités de France (Paris: Société d’Édition “Les Belles Lettres,” 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heraclitus,Homeric Problems, ed. & trans. Donald A. Russell & David Konstan, Writings from the Greco-Roman World 14 (Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfred Heubeck, Stephanie West, & J. B. Hainsworth,A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey, vol. 1. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer,Iliad, Books I–XII, ed. D. B. Monro, 5th. ed. rvd. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer,Ilias, Books XIII–XXIV, ed. Thomas W. Allen (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1931).

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer,The Iliad of Homer, trans. Richmond Lattimore (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer,The Iliad of Homer, trans. Alexander Pope, ed. Maynard Mack, 2 vols (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer,Ilias & Odyssea, et in easdem scholia, sive interpretatio Didymi. Cum latina versione accuratissima, indiceque graeco locupletissimo rerum ac variantium lectionum, accurante Corn. Schrevelio, Tome 1 (Amsterdam: Elzevier, 1656).

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer,Odyssey, with a commentary by W. B. Stanford, 2 vols., 1947 (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1980 & 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer,The Odyssey of Homer, trans. Richmond Lattimore, 1965 (New York: Harper Colophon Books, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer,The Odyssey of Homer, trans. Alexander Pope, ed. Maynard Mack, 2 vols. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Homeric Hymns, Homeric Apocrypha, Lives of Homer, ed. & trans. Martin L. West, Loeb Classical Library 496 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Amélie Kuhrt,The Ancient Near East c. 3000-330 b.c., 2 vols., 1995 (New York: Routledge, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrew Laird. “Figures of Allegory from Homer to Latin Epic,” inMetaphor, Allegory, and the Classical Tradition: Ancient Thought and Modern Revisions, ed. G. R. Boys-Stones (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), 151–75.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Robert Lamberton,Homer the Theologian: Neoplatonist Allegorical Reading and the Growth of the Epic Tradition (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert Lamberton, “Introduction,” inHomer’s Ancient Readers: the Hermeneutics of Greek Epic’s Earliest Exegetes, vii-xxiv, ed. Robert Lamberton & John J. Keaney (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Joachim Latacz, “Epic,” inBrill’s New Pauly: Encyclopaedia of the Ancient World, vol. 4, cols. 1040–50 (Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Joachim Latacz,Troy and Homer: Towards a Solution of an Old Mystery, trans. Kevin Windle & Rosh Ireland (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anne Ley, “Athena,” inBrill’s New Pauly, Encyclopaedia of the Ancient World, vol. 2, cols. 233–40 (Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Adrienne Mayor,Greek Fire, Poison Arrows and Scorpion Bombs: Biological and Chemical Warfare in the Ancient World (Woodstock, NY: Overlook Duckworth, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ian Morris, “Homer and the Iron Age,” inA New Companion to Homer, ed. Ian Morris & Barry Powell, Mnemosyne Suppl. 163 (New York: Brill, 1997), pp. 535–59,

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarah Morris, “Homer and the Near East,” inA New Companion to Homer, ed. Ian Morris & Barry Powell, Mnemosyne Suppl. 163 (New York: Brill, 1997), pp. 599–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheila Murnaghan,Disguise and Recognition in the Odyssey (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael Murrin,The Allegorical Epic: Essays in Its Rise and Decline (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin Nilsson,The Minoan-Mycenaean Religion and its Survival in Greek Religion, 2nd. rvd. ed. (Lund: C. W. K. Gleerup, 1950).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin Nilsson,The Mycenaean Origin of Greek Mythology, New Introduction and Bibliography by Emily Vermeule (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato,Symposium, trans. Michael Joyce, inThe Collected Dialogues of Plato Including the Letters, ed. Edith Hamilton & Huntington Cairns, Bollingen Series LXXI (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1961), pp. 526–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pseudo-Plutarch,Essay on the Life and Poetry of Homer, ed. J. J. Keaney & Robert Lamberton, American Philological Association, American Classical Studies 40 (Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • N. J. Richardson, “Homeric Professors in the Age of the Sophists,”Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 201=n. s. 21 (1975), pp. 65–81.

  • Stephen Scully,Homer and the Sacred City (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jean Seznec,The Survival of the Pagan Gods, trans. Barbara F. Sessions, 1953 (New York: Harper Torchbooks and The Bollingen Library, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • State Archives of Assyria, vol. III: Alasdair Livingstone,Court Poetry and Literary Miscellanea (Helsinki: Helsinki University Press, 1989).

  • Martin L. West, ed. & trans.,Greek Epic Fragments from the Seventh to the Fifth Centuries b.c., Loeb Classical Library 497 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes Eannes de Zurara,The Chronicle of the Discovery and Conquest of Guinea, trans. Charles Raymond Beazley & Edgar Prestage, 2 vols., Hakluyt Society, First Series 95 & 100 (1896 & 1899) (New York: Burt Franklin, n. d.).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murrin, M. Athena and telemachus. Int class trad 13, 499–514 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02923022

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02923022

Keywords

Navigation