Skip to main content
Log in

Plant responses to water stress: changes in growth, dry matter production, stomatal frequency and leaf anatomy

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Biologia Plantarum

Abstract

The responses of seedlings of three fast growing tree species,Eucalyptus hybrid(E. camaldulensis × E. teriticornis), Casuarina equisetifolia andMelia azedarach, to different levels of soil moisture in controlled glasshouse conditions were compared. The survival percentage, height of plants, number of leaves per plant, number of branches, fresh mass and dry mass of roots, stems, branches and leaves decreased in the three species with increasing water stress. Stomatal frequency and length of stomata inEucalyptus andMelia also decreased with increasing water stress. However, no significant difference was obtained in the width of stomata and the ratio of number of open stomata to total number of stomata per unit area. The leaf thickness decreased, but the thickness of palisade parenchyma increased with increasing water stress inEucalyptus hybrid andCasuarina. Leaf thickness ofMelia did not show any significant variation due to water stress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, M.D., Kloeppel, B.D., Kubiske, M.E.: Ecophysiological and morphological responses to shade and drought in two contrasting ecotypes ofPrunus serotina.—Tree Physiol.10: 343–355, 1992.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, M.D., Kubiske, M.E., Steiner, K.C.: Drought adaptations and responses in five genotypes ofFraxinus pennsylvanica Marsch.: photosynthesis, water relations and leaf morphology.—Tree Physiol.6: 305–315, 1990.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, E., Parry, M.A.J., Vandel, J., Lawlor, D.W.: Effect of water stress on photosynthesis, leaf characteristics and productivity of field-grownNicotiana tabacum L., genotypes selected for survival at low carbon dioxide.—J. exp. Bot.43: 1001–1008, 1992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goubin, L., Kemp, D.R.: Water stress affects the productivity, growth components, competitiveness and water relations ofPhalaris and white clover growing in a mixed pasture.—Aust. J. agr. Res.43: 659–672, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D. H., Schaedle, M., DeVit, M.J., Manion, P.D.: Clonal variation ofPopulus tremuloides: responses to diurnal drought stress.—Tree Physiol.8: 297–304, 1991.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Handson, A.D., Hitz, W.D.: Metabolic responses of mesophytes to plant water deficit.—Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol.33: 163–203, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennessey, T.C., Dougherty, P.M., Kossuth, S.V., Johnson, J.D.: Stress Physiology and Forest Productivity.—Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoleni, S., Dickman, D.I.: Differential physiological and morphological responses of two hybridPopulus clones to water stress.—Tree Physiol.4: 61–70, 1988.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, B.J., Landsberg, J.J.: Water stress and seedling growth of two eucalypt species from contrasting habitats.—Tree Physiol.5: 207–218, 1989.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Volkenburgh, E., Boyer, J.S.: Inhibitory effects of water deficit on maize leaf elongation.—Plant Physiol.77: 190–194, 1985.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y.-T., Hsiao, K.-H., Gregg, L.L.: Antitranspirant, water stress, and growth retardant influence growth of Golden Pothos.—Hort Science27: 222–225, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by J. ČATSKÝ

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nautiyal, S., Badola, H.K., Pal, M. et al. Plant responses to water stress: changes in growth, dry matter production, stomatal frequency and leaf anatomy. Biol Plant 36, 91–97 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02921275

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02921275

Keywords

Navigation