Skip to main content
Log in

Time-dependent reversal of the inhibitory effect of 5-fluorode-oxyuridine on flowering ofChenopodium rubrum L. by thymidine

Casově závislé překonání inhibiěního úěinku 5-fluordesoxyuridinu na kvetení uChencpodium rubrum L. thymidinem

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Biologia Plantarum

Abstract

Flower initiation induced by three inductive photoperiods inChenopodium rubrum L. was fully inhibited by treating the shoot apex with a 5 μl drop of 1×10−5 m 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (FDU). This inhibition may be reversed by thymidine applied simultaneously with or after FDU treatment at any time during photoperiodic induction. One day after the end of induction the inhibition caused by FDU is irreparable even by increasing thymidine concentrations. It is concluded that photoperiodic floral induction may take place inChenopodium even if DNA synthesis is suppressed.

Abstract

Začátek kvetení uChenopodium rubrum L. vyvolaný třemi indukěními fotoperiodami byl zcela inhibován aplikací 5 μl roztoku 1×10−5 m 5-fluordesoxyuridinu (FDU) na vegetační vrchol. Tato inhibice může být překonána thymidinem aplikovaným současně nebo po aplikaci FDU v kterékoli době v průběhu fotoperiodické indukce. Jeden den po skončení indukce nelze inhibici způsobenou FDU překonat ani zvýšenými koncentracemi, thymidinu. Pokusy nasvědčují tomu, že fotoperiodická indukce probíhá uChenopodium rubrum i tehdy, když synthesa DNA je potlačena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bonner, J., Zeevaart, J. A. D. Ribonucleic acid synthesis in the bud an essential component of floral induction inXanthium.—Plant Physiol.37: 43–49, 1962.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, L. T.: Inflorescence initiation, inLolium temulentum L. VI. Effect of some inhibitors of nucleic acid protein and steroid byiosynthesis.—Austr. J. biol. Sci.17: 24–35, 1964.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, D.: Versuche mit DNS-Antimetaboliten zum Nachweis einer differentiellen Genaktivität bei der Induktion der Anthocyansynthese.—Z. Pflanzenphysiol.54: 356–370, 1966.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seidlová, F.: Inhibition of flowering ofChenopodium rubrum L. after the action of actinomycin D.—Biol. Plant.10: 318–321, 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidlová, F., Krekule, J.: Growth effects of 2-thiouracil and possibility of selective inhibition of plant differentiation inChenopodium rubrum L.—Biol. Plant.10: 41–50, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umemura, K., Ootta, Y.: Effect of nucleic acid and protein antimetabolites on frond and flower production inLemna gibba G3.—Plant Cell Physiol.6: 73–85, 1965.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeevaart, J. A. D.: DNA multiplication as a requirement for expression of floral stimulus inPharbitis nil.—Plant Physiol.37: 296–304, 1962.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Address: Ke dvoru 15, Praha 6-Vokovice, Czechoslovakia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krekule, J., Seidlová, F. & Ullmann, J. Time-dependent reversal of the inhibitory effect of 5-fluorode-oxyuridine on flowering ofChenopodium rubrum L. by thymidine. Biol Plant 11, 477–480 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02920713

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02920713

Keywords

Navigation