Abstract
Flower initiation induced by three inductive photoperiods inChenopodium rubrum L. was fully inhibited by treating the shoot apex with a 5 μl drop of 1×10−5 m 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (FDU). This inhibition may be reversed by thymidine applied simultaneously with or after FDU treatment at any time during photoperiodic induction. One day after the end of induction the inhibition caused by FDU is irreparable even by increasing thymidine concentrations. It is concluded that photoperiodic floral induction may take place inChenopodium even if DNA synthesis is suppressed.
Abstract
Začátek kvetení uChenopodium rubrum L. vyvolaný třemi indukěními fotoperiodami byl zcela inhibován aplikací 5 μl roztoku 1×10−5 m 5-fluordesoxyuridinu (FDU) na vegetační vrchol. Tato inhibice může být překonána thymidinem aplikovaným současně nebo po aplikaci FDU v kterékoli době v průběhu fotoperiodické indukce. Jeden den po skončení indukce nelze inhibici způsobenou FDU překonat ani zvýšenými koncentracemi, thymidinu. Pokusy nasvědčují tomu, že fotoperiodická indukce probíhá uChenopodium rubrum i tehdy, když synthesa DNA je potlačena.
References
Bonner, J., Zeevaart, J. A. D. Ribonucleic acid synthesis in the bud an essential component of floral induction inXanthium.—Plant Physiol.37: 43–49, 1962.
Evans, L. T.: Inflorescence initiation, inLolium temulentum L. VI. Effect of some inhibitors of nucleic acid protein and steroid byiosynthesis.—Austr. J. biol. Sci.17: 24–35, 1964.
Hess, D.: Versuche mit DNS-Antimetaboliten zum Nachweis einer differentiellen Genaktivität bei der Induktion der Anthocyansynthese.—Z. Pflanzenphysiol.54: 356–370, 1966.
Seidlová, F.: Inhibition of flowering ofChenopodium rubrum L. after the action of actinomycin D.—Biol. Plant.10: 318–321, 1968.
Seidlová, F., Krekule, J.: Growth effects of 2-thiouracil and possibility of selective inhibition of plant differentiation inChenopodium rubrum L.—Biol. Plant.10: 41–50, 1968.
Umemura, K., Ootta, Y.: Effect of nucleic acid and protein antimetabolites on frond and flower production inLemna gibba G3.—Plant Cell Physiol.6: 73–85, 1965.
Zeevaart, J. A. D.: DNA multiplication as a requirement for expression of floral stimulus inPharbitis nil.—Plant Physiol.37: 296–304, 1962.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Address: Ke dvoru 15, Praha 6-Vokovice, Czechoslovakia.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krekule, J., Seidlová, F. & Ullmann, J. Time-dependent reversal of the inhibitory effect of 5-fluorode-oxyuridine on flowering ofChenopodium rubrum L. by thymidine. Biol Plant 11, 477–480 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02920713
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02920713