Abstract
This paper examines agency theory arguments in the banking industry by analyzing the effect of four variables that proxy for agency costs—earnings volatility, managers' portfolio diversification losses, bank size, and standard deviation of bank equity returns—on the three financial policy variables of managerial stock ownership, leverage, and dividend yield. It is one of the first studies that examines the determination of financial policy variables, in light of agency concerns, in the banking industry. The study examines the largest 104 U.S. banks during the period 1985–1989. Evidence suggests that bank size and a measure of the managers' portfolio diversification opportunity set affect the bank's level of managerial stock ownership, leverage and dividends.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ang, James S., Jess H. Chua, andJohn J. McConnell. “The Administrative Costs Of Corporate Bankruptcy: A Note.”Journal of Finance 37, no. 1 (March 1982): 219–226.
Barnea, Amir, Robert A. Haugen, andLemma W. Senbet.Agency Problems and Financial Contracting Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 1985.
Bradley, Michael, Gregg A. Jarrell, andE. Han Kim. “On The Existence Of An Optimal Capital Structure: Theory and Evidence.”Journal of Finance 39, no. 3 (July 1984): 857–878.
Crutchley, Clair E. andRobert S. Hansen. “A Test Of The Agency Theory Of Managerial Ownership, Corporate Leverage, And Corporate Dividends.”Financial Management 18, no. 4 (Winter 1989): 36–46.
Easterbrook Frank H. “Two Agency-Cost Explanations of Dividends.”American Economic Review 74, no. 4 (September 1984): 650–659.
Friend, Irwin andLarry H. P. Lang. “An Empirical Test Of The Impact of Managerial Self-Interest On Corporate Capital Structure.”Journal of Finance 43, no. 2 (June 1988): 271–282.
Hannan, Timothy H. “Expense-Preference Behavior in Banking: A Reexamination.”Journal of Political Economy 87, no. 4 (August 1979): 891–895.
Hannan, Timothy H. andFerdinand Mavinga. “Expense-Preference Behavior and Managerial Control: The Case of the Banking Firm.”Bell Journal of Economics 11, no. 2 (Autumn 1980): 671–682.
Hansen, Robert S. “Evaluating the Costs of a New Equity Issue.”Midland Corporate Finance Journal 4 (Spring 1986): 42–55.
Hansen, Robert S. “The Demise Of The Rights Issue.”The Review of Financial Studies 1, no. 3 (1988-1989): 289–309.
Herring, Richard J. andPrashant Vankudre. “Growth Opportunities And Risk-Taking By Financial Intermediaries.”Journal of Finance 42, no. 3 (July 1987): 583–600.
Jensen, Michael C. andWilliam H. Meckling. “Theory Of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, And Ownership Structure.”Journal of Financial Economics 3, no. 4 (December 1976): 305–360.
Long, Michael S. andIleen B. Malitz. “Investment Patterns and Financial Leverage.” inCorporate Capital Structures in the United States, ed. Benjamin M. Friedman, 325–348. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1985.
Rozeff, Michael S. “Growth, Beta And Agency Costs As Determinants Of Dividend Payout Ratios.”Journal of Financial Research 5, no. 3 (Fall 1982): 249–259.
White, Halbert. “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.”Econometrica 48, no. 4 (May 1980): 817–838.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mercado-Mendez, J., Willey, T. Agency costs in the banking industry: An examination of ownership behavior, leverage and dividend policies. J Econ Finan 19, 105–117 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02920617
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02920617