Skip to main content
Log in

Microbial reduction of SO2 as a means of byproduct recovery from regenerable, dry scrubbing processes for flue gas desulfurization

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstruct

A project is under way at the University of Tulsa to investigate the reduction of SO2 to H2S by sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB) in co-culture with mixed fermentative heterotrophs. We have previously demonstrated that SO2 is completely reduced to H2S (contact times of 1–2 s) in cultures in which no redox poising agents were required and glucose served as the ultimate source of carbon energy. We have proposed that such a microbial process could be coupled with a Claus reactor to recover elemental sulfur as a byproduct of regenerable, dry scrubbing processes for flue gas desulfurization. The development of this process concept has continued with a study of the use of molasses as a source of carbon and reduced nitrogen, identification of important non-SRB heterotrophs in process cultures, and the identification of the end products of carbohydrate fermentation that serve as carbon and energy sources for the SRB and identification of the end products of SRB metabolism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. Guderian, R. and Stratmann, H.(1968),Forschungsbeerichte des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen,1920, 114.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Linzon, S. N.(1971),J. Air Poll. Contr. Assoc. 21, 81.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Coffin, D. L. and Knelson, J. H.(1977), Federal Power Commission Report, II-6-26.

  4. Amdur, M. O. and Underhill, D.(1968),Environ. Health 16, 460.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Drummond, C. J., Yeh, J. T., Joubert, J. I., and Ratafia-Brown, J. A. (1985),78th Annual Meeting & Exhibition of the Air Pollution Control Association.

  6. Yeh, J. T., Drummond, C. J., Halsbeck, J. L., and Neal, L. G.(1987),AIChE Spring National Meeting, Houston, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dasu, B. N. and Sublette, K. L.(1989),Biotech. and Bioeng. 34, 405.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Postgate, J. R.(1984),The Sulfate Reducing Bacteria, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maddox, R.N. (1974),Cas and Liquid Sweetening, Campbell Petroleum Series, Norman, OK.

  10. Campbell, J. M. (1978),Gas conditioning and Processing, Campbell Petroleum Series, Norman, OK.

  11. Dasu, B. N. and Sublette, K. L. (1989),Appl. Biochem. Biotech. 20/21, 207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Clark, J. M. ed. (1964),Experimental Biochemistry, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nelson, N.(1944),J. Biol. Chem. 153, 375.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Merrick-Glass, M. T. (1986),American Clinical Products.

  15. Miller, L. and Berger, T. (1985),Hewlett-Packard Gas Chromatography Application Note 228–41.

  16. Atkinson, B. and Mavituna, F. (1983),Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology Handbook, Nature Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Buchanan, R. E. and Gibbons, N. E. eds. (1974),Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 8th ed., Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Plumb, P., Lee, K.H. & Sublette, K.L. Microbial reduction of SO2 as a means of byproduct recovery from regenerable, dry scrubbing processes for flue gas desulfurization. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 24, 785–797 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02920295

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02920295

Index Entries

Navigation