Skip to main content
Log in

Adjusted beta responses to dividend announcements

  • Published:
Journal of Economics and Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the impact of regression tendency and order bias on the calculated average residuals and around the event period is examined. The findings indicate that the abnormal return calculated with unadjusted parameters may lead to a misestimation of the true average residual. However, the bias due to regression tendency and order bias may not change the essential conclusions about the significance of the residuals if they are highly significant. However, for residuals that are borderline statistically significant, compensation for order bias and regression tendency may be important. In addition, if the magnitude of the abnormal return is of interest, residuals calculated with biased betas may over- or understate the true abnormal return. For small non-randomly selected samples, the differences in the residuals using unadjusted and order-bias-adjusted betas are more prominent. Therefore, the researcher should be aware of the impact that regression tendency and order bias can have on the interpretation of results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bar-Yosef, Sasson, andLucy Huffman. “The Information Content of Dividends: A Signalling Approach”.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 21, no. 1 (March 1986), 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blume, Marshall E. “On the Assessment of Risk”.Journal of Finance 26, no. 1 (March 1971), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blume, Marshall E. “Betas and Their Regression Tendencies”.Journal of Finance 30, no. 3 (June 1975), 785–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blume, Marshall E.. “Betas and Their Regression Tendencies: Some Further Evidence.”Journal of Finance 34 no. 1 (March 1979), 265–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Carolyn, andR. Stephen Sears. “Dividend Announcements and Changes in Beta: A Regression Tendency”.Financial Review 29, no. 3 (August 1994): 371–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Kam C., Benton E. Gup, andMing Shiun Pan. “An Empirical Analysis of Stock Prices in Major Asian Markets and the United States”.Financial Review 27, no. 2 (May 1992): 289–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charest, Guy. “Dividend Information, Stock Returns and Market Efficiency”.Journal of Financial Economics 6, no. 3 (September 1978), 297–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dielman, Terry E. andHenry R. Oppenheimer. “An Examination of Investor Behavior during Periods of Large Dividend Changes”.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 19, no. 2 (June 1984), 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eades, Kenneth. “Empirical Evidence on Dividends as a Signal of Firm Value.”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 17, no. 4 (November 1982) 471–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgers, Pieter T., James R. Haltiner, andWilliam H. Hawthorne. “Beta Regression Tendencies: Statistical and Real Causes”.Journal of Finance 34, no. 1 (March 1979): 261–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, Taylor W. III,Don R. Hansen andDon W. Vickrey. “Additional Evidence on the Abatement of Errors in Predicting Beta Through Increases in Portfolio Size and on the Regression Tendency”.Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 15, no. 2 (Summer 1988): 185–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, Michael A.. “An Explanation of Security Beta Regression Tendencies”.Southern Economic Journal 47, no. 3 (January 1981): 809–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gooding, Arthur E. andTerence P. O'Malley. “Market Phase and the Stationarity of Beta”.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 12, no. 5 (December 1977): 833–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal, Zahid, andPrakash L. Dheeriya. “A Comparison of the Market Model and Random Coefficient Model Using Mergers as an Event”.Journal of Economics and Business 43, no. 1 (February 1991): 87–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemkosky, Robert C. andJohn D. Martin. “The Adjustment of Beta Forecasts”.Journal of Finance 30, no. 4 (September 1975): 1123–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, Robert W. andRicardo J. Rodriques. “The Regression Tendencies of Betas: A Reappraisal”.Financial Review 24, no. 2 (May 1988): 319–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Cheng F. andCarl R. Chen. “Beta Stability and Tendency: An Application of a Variable Mean Response regression Model”.Journal of Economics and Business 34, no. 3 (August 1982): 201–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, Larry J. andK. Rao Kadiyala. “Risk Measurement for Event-Dependent Security Returns”.Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 6, no. 1 (January 1988): 43–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantripragada, Krishna G. “Beta Adjustment Methods”.Journal of Business Research 8, no. 3 (September 1980): 329–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozeff, Michael S. “Growth, Beta and Agency Costs as Determinants of Dividend Payout Ratios”.Journal of Financial Research 5, no. 3 (Fall 1982): 249–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasicek, Oldrich A.. “A Note on Using Cross-Sectional Information in Bayesian Estimation of Security Betas”.Journal of Finance 28, no. 5 (December 1973): 1233–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolridge, J. Randall. “The Informational Content of Dividend Changes”.Journal of Financial Research 5, no. 3 (Fall 1982): 237–247.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carroll, C., Fok, R.C.W. Adjusted beta responses to dividend announcements. J Econ Finan 19, 75–92 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02920216

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02920216

Keywords

Navigation