Skip to main content

Election outcomes and economic conditions: An application of a logit model

Abstract

In this paper the author examines the impact of macroeconomic conditions on the probability of the incumbent party winning a gubernatorial election. Using a sample of 265 gubernatorial elections held during the 1970–1988 period, the findings of this study indicate that the incumbent party’s probability of victory is not significantly affected by either state or national macroeconomic conditions. The author also finds that neither the unemployment rate nor per capita income growth affect the incumbent party’s probability of winning an election.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Adams, James D., andLawrence Kenny. “The Retention of State Governors.”Public Choice 62 (July 1989): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, John H., andForrest D. Nelson.Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arcelus, Francisco, andAllan H. Meltzer. “The Effect of Aggregate Economic Variables on Congressional Elections.”The American Political Science Review 69 (December 1975): 1232–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Keith. “A Simultaneous Equation Model of Canadian Voting Behaviour.”Canadian Journal of Political Science 20 (September 1987): 553–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Keith, andMarquis Johnson. “Inflation, Unemployment, and Canadian Voting Behaviour.”Canadian Journal of Political Science 21 (September 1988): 569–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chubb, John E.. “Institutions, the Economy, and the Dynamics of State Elections.”The American Political Science Review 82 (March 1988): 133–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, Robert S.. “Economic Conditions and the Congressional Vote: A Review of the Macrolevel Evidence.”American Journal of Political Science 34 (May 1990): 373–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fair, Ray C.. “The Effect of Economic Events on Votes for the President.”The Review of Economics and Statistics 60 (May 1978): 159–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galeotti, Gianluigi, andAntonio Forcina. “Political Loyalties and the Economy: The U.S. Case.”The Review of Economics and Statistics 71 (August 1989): 511–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, Sukesh K.Econometrics: Theory and Applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Happy, J.R.. “Voter Sensitivty to Economic Conditions: A Canadian-American Comparison.”Comparative Politics 54 (October 1986): 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Gary C.. “Does the Economy Matter in Midterm Elections?.”American Journal of Political Science 34 (May 1990): 400–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, Gerald H.. “Short-term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior, 1896–1964.”The American Political Science Review 65 (March 1971): 131–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Beck, Michael S.. “Comparative Economic Voting: Britain, France, Germany, Italy.”American Journal of Political Science 30 (May 1986): 314–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, Kristen R.. “Econometric Analysis of Electoral Behavior: A Critical Review.”Political Behavior 1 (Summer 1979): 137–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, Sam. “Economic Conditions and Gubernatorial Elections.”The American Economic Review 77 (May 1987): 293–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, A., H. Kaufman, S.J. Eldersveld, and F. Freidel. “The Effect of Economic Conditions on Congressional Elections: 1946–1958.”The Review of Economics and Statistics (1962): 458–465.

  • Riker, William H., andPeter C. Ordershook. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.”The American Political Science Review 62 (March 1968): 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scammon, Richard M., andAlice V. McGillivary.ed.America Votes: A Handbook of Contemporary American Election Statistics. Washington, DC: Elections Research Center, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, Robert M.. “Economic Voting for Governor and U.S. Senator: The Electoral Consequences of Federalism.”Journal of Politics 52 (February 1990): 29–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, George J.. “General Economic Conditions and National Elections.”The American Economic Review 63 (May 1973): 160–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, Edward R.. “Determinants of the Outcomes of Midterm Congressional Elections.”The American Political Science Review 69 (September 1975): 812–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levernier, W. Election outcomes and economic conditions: An application of a logit model. J Econ Finan 17, 115–125 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02920087

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02920087

Keywords

  • Logit Model
  • Election Outcome
  • American Political Science Review
  • Macroeconomic Condition
  • Opposition Party