Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal calibration for rotating analyzer ellipsometer

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have modeled most errors, which affect the measurement accuracy, with Jone’s matrix. From the simulation, we can characterize the errors and take good aids for selecting components and designing ellipsometer. The traditional residual method has good performance when there are only azimuth angle errors and extinction errors, but it has not good performance when there are other errors. We have proposed the optimal calibration method for overcoming the residual method. The optimal method selects error values to have the least square difference between the measured thickness and the simulated thickness. We can reduce the design variables to three, incident angle error, and azimuth angle errors of polarizer and analyzer. The optimization results are slightly different from the residual method, and have smaller standard deviation of errors than the residual method. The experiment shows good agreement with the simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. R. and Bashara, N. M., 1976, “In Process Ellipsometer Azimuth Angle Calibration,” Appl. Opt., 15, pp. 3179–3184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspnes, D. E. and Studna, A. A., 1971, “Geometrically Exact Ellipsometer Alignment,” Appl. Opt., 10, pp. 1024–1030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspnes, D. E. and Studna, A. A., 1975, “High precision scanning ellipsometer,” Appl. Opt., 14, pp. 220–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azzam, R. M. and Bashara, N. M., 1977,Ellipsometry and Polarized Light (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977), Chap. 5, pp. 364–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. W., 1990, “Automatic Rotating Element Ellipsometers: Calibration, Operation, and Real-Time Applications,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 61, pp. 2029–2062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dignam, M. J. and Moskovits, M., 1970, “Azimuth Misalignment and Anisotropy as Sources of Error in Ellipsometry,” Appl. Opt., 9, pp. 1868–1873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoyan H, Russev, 1989, “Correction for Nonlinearity and Polarization-Dependent Sensitivity in the Detection System of Rotating Analyzer Ellipsometers,” Applied Optics 28, pp. 1504–1507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Meulen, Y. J. and Hien, N. C. J., 1974, Opt. Soc. Am., 64, p. 804.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunglim Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, S., Gweon, D. Optimal calibration for rotating analyzer ellipsometer. J Mech Sci Technol 19, 2165–2171 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02916514

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02916514

Key Words

Navigation