Skip to main content
Log in

Management of Barrett’s oesophagus in 2001 in Ireland

  • original paper
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background Endoscopic surveillance of patients with Barrett’s oesophagus is recommended to detect early carcinoma. The practice patterns of endoscopists since the publication of more recent management guidelines remain unknown.

Methods All endoscopists (n=68) in the Irish Medical Directory and their trainees were sent a postal questionnaire on Barrett’s surveillance.

Results Fifty-five per cent (30/54) perform surveillance on all patients with Barrett’s oesophagus and 38% on selected patients. In patients with no dysplasia, repeat endoscopy was more commonly practiced annually (28/54) than every two to three years (23/54). Surgeons were more likely to perform surveillance annually than gastroenterologists (75% vs 40%). Only 26% of endoscopists took four-quadrant biopsies every 2cm. Intervention was recommended by a majority (28/54) of endoscopists in a patient with high grade dysplasia. A majority of respondents (47/54) would have surveillance if they were found to have Barrett’s oesophagus.

Conclusion Most endoscopists in Ireland do not adhere to recent guidelines in their management of Barrett’s oesophagus. Surgical endoscopists perform surveillance more frequently than their medical colleagues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sampliner R. Practice guidelines on the diagnosis, surveillance and therapy of Barrett’s esophagus. The Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology.Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93: 1028–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Anon. The role of endoscopy in the surveillance of premalignant conditions of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Guidelines for clinical application.Gastrointest Endosc 1988 May-Jun; 34 (3 Suppl): 18S–20S.

  3. Dent J, Brennan CG, Collen MG et al. Barrett’s oesophagus. Working Party Report of the World Congress of Gastroenterology. Melbourne. Blackwell Scientific Publications 1990: pp17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Van Sandick JW, van Lanschot JJB, Kuiken BW et al. Impact of endoscopic surveillance of Barrett ’s oesophagus on pathological stage and clinical outcome of Barrett’s carcinoma.Gut 1998; 43: 216–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wright TA, Gray MR, Morris AI et al. Cost effectiveness of detecting Barrett’s cancer.Gut 1996; 39: 574–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Van der Veen AH, Dees J, Blankenstein JD, van Blankenstein M. Adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s oesophagus: an overrated risk.Gut 1989; 30 (1): 14–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. MacDonald CE, Wicks AC, Playford RJ. Final results from 10 year cohort of patients undergoing surveillance for Barrett’s oesophagus: observational study.BMJ 2000; 321: 1252–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bani-Hani K, Sue-Ling H, Johnston D, Axon AT, Martin IG. Barrett’s oesophagus: results from a 13 year surveillance programme.Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000; 12 (6): 649–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Levine DS. Management of dysplasia in the columnar-lined esophagus.Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1997; 26 (3): 613–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith AM, Maxwell-Armstrong CA, Welch NT, Scholfield JH. Surveillance for Barrett’s oesophagus in the UK.Br J Surg 1999; 86 (2): 276–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Falk GW, Ours TM, Richter JE. Practice patterns for surveillance of Barrett’s oesophagus in the United States.Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52 (2): 197–203.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ackroyd R, Wakefield SE, Williams JL, Stoddard CJ, Reed MW. Surveillance of Barrett’s oesophagus: a need for guidelines?Dis Esophagus 1997; 10 (3): 185–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Eloubeidi MA, Provenzale D. Does this patient have Barrett’s esophagus? The utility of predicting Barrett’s esophagus at the index endoscopy.Am J Gastroenterol. 1999; 94 (4): 937–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Woolf GM, Riddell RH, Irvine EJ, Hunt RH. A study to examine agreement between endoscopy and histology for the diagnosis of columnar lined (Barrett’s) esophagus.Gastrointest Endosc 1989; 35 (6): 541–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schnell TG, Sontag SJ, Chejfec G et al. Long-term nonsurgical management of Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia.Gastroenterology 2001; 120: 1607–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Weston AP, Sharma P, Topalovski M et al. Long-term follow-up of Barrett’s high-grade dysplasia.Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95 (8): 1888- 93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P MacMathuna.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moss, A., Clarke, E., Crowe, J. et al. Management of Barrett’s oesophagus in 2001 in Ireland. Ir J Med Sci 172, 174–176 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02915284

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02915284

Keywords

Navigation