Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting outcome after appendicectomy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim To validate an intraoperative appendicitis severity score (IASS) and examine outcome following emergency appendectomy.

Methods A prospective study was undertaken, enrolling consecutive patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy. Data were obtained independently on preoperative Alvarado scores, IASS (0-3: 0 no inflammation, 1 engorged appendix/no peritonitis, 2 peritoneal reaction/exudate or 3 evidence of perforation/abscess) and postoperative outcome parameters.

Results There were 149 patients identified with a mean age of 20.7 years. There was no association between Alvarado score and length of hospital stay, septic complication, patient sex or duration of symptoms (p>0.05). IASS was found to be an independent risk factor for septic complication, wound infection (p<0.05) and length of hospital stay (p<0.001). There was no correlation between preoperative duration of symptoms or time until surgery and intraoperative score.

Conclusions This simple scoring system can identify patients more likely to suffer morbidity following emergency appendicectomy. Specifically, this system identifies patients who have a high risk of sepsis and therefore could be of use when comparing healthcare performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cuschieri A. The small intestine and vermiform appendix. In: Cuschieri A, Giles GR, Mossa AR (Eds). Essential Surgical Practice, 3rd edition. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1995: 1297–329.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Janik JS, Firor HV. Pediatric appendicitis. A 20-year study of 1,640 children at Cook County (Illinois) Hospital.Arch Surg 1979; 114 (6): 717–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McSween RNM, Whaley K. Appendicitis. Muir’s Textbook of Pathology; 13th edition. London: E Arnold 1992: 716–7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barker DJP, Morris J. Acute appendicitis, bathrooms, and diet in Britain and Ireland.BMJ 1998; 296: 953–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rubin HR. Framework for evidence-based surgery. In: Gordon TA, Cameron JL (Eds). Evidence-Based Surgery; Hamilton BC: Decker Inc., 2000: 47–59.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hale DA et al. Appendectomy: a contemporary appraisal.Ann Surg 1997; 225: 252–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McCall JL, Sharples K, Jadallah F. Systematic review of randomised trials comparing laparoscopic with open appendicectomy.Br J Surg 1997; 84: 1045–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kraemer M, Ohmann C, Leppert R, Yang Q. Macroscopic assessment of the appendix at diagnostic laparoscopy is reliable.Surg Endosc 2000; 14 (7): 625–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Iezzoni LI. Risk and outcomes. In: Risk Adjustment for Measuring Healthcare Outcomes. Chicago: Health Administration Press; 1997: 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Escarce J. Admission source to the medical intensive care unit predicts hospital death independent of APACHE II score.JAMA 1990; 264 (18): 2289–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Charlson M. A new method of classifying prognostic co-morbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.J Chron Dis 1987; 40 (5): 373–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Deyo R, Cherkin DC, Ciol M. Adapting a clinical co-morbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 46 (6): 613–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Freeman JL, Fetter RB, Park H et al. Diagnosis-related group refinement with diagnosis- and procedure-specific co-morbidities and complications.Med Care 1995; 33: 806–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA et al. The APACHE III prognosis system: risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalised adults.Chest 1991; 100: 1619–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis.Ann Emerg Med 1986; 15 (5): 557–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pittman-Waller VA, Myers JG, Stewart RM et al. Appendicitis: why so complicated? Analysis of 5,755 consecutive appendectomies.Am Surg 2000; 66 (6): 548–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Andersson R, Hugander A, Thulin A, Nystrom PO, Olaison G. Indications for operation in suspected appendicitis and incidence of perforation.BMJ 1994; 308: 107–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kell MR, Winter DC, Ryan D, Lynch M, Brew B, Rajpal P, Kirwan WO, Redmond HP. Nitric oxide synthetase andHelicobacter pylori in patients undergoing appendicectomy.Br J Surg 1999; 86 (12): 1538–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to MR Kell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kell, M., Power, K., Winter, D. et al. Predicting outcome after appendicectomy. Ir J Med Sci 172, 63–65 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02915248

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02915248

Keywords

Navigation