Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social capital—A potential tool for analysis of the relationship between ageing individuals and their social environment

  • Published:
Ageing International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of social capital has acquired some currency amongst policy analysts to refer to the social norms, networks and trust that facilitate co-operation and provision of mutual support within or between groups. As yet there is no agreed definition of the concept; however influential Australian policy bodies are developing measures to track changes in social capital and relate these to policy changes. Most research is concerned with exploration of the concept in locality-based communities and its application to developing societies. This paper reviews research undertaken in Australia and overseas to determine the elements of social capital that may have importance in relation to policy development in response to an ageing population. It concludes that the concept could be of considerable value in understanding the determinants of policy success or failure, but that further research is required to understand the nature of social capital as it relates to older people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ABS (2004). Measuring Social Capital. An Australian Framework and Indicators. 2004. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonucci, T. C. (2004). Social Support, Psychology of. InInternational Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, pp. 14465–14469.

  • Baker, W. E. and Faulkner, R. R. (2004). Social networks and loss of capital.Social Networks 26: 2 May 2004, pp. 91–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldock, C. V. (1999). Seniors as volunteers: an international perspective on policy.Ageing and Society 19, pp. 581–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, F., Palmer, C., Modra, C., et al. (2000). Families, social capital and health. In Winter, I. (Ed)—Social capital and public policy in Australia. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies pp. 250–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, F. and Ziersch, A. (2003). Social capital: A glossary.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 57:5, pp. 320–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beresford, P. and Croft, S. (1993).—Citizen Involvement: a practical guide for change. London: Macmillan. British Association of Social Workers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, A. and Hughes, P. (2001). The identification and analysis of indicators of community strength and outcomes. Occasional Paper No. 3 Canberra: Department of Family and Community Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boneham, M. A. and Sixsmith, J. A. (2005). The voices of older women in a disadvantaged community: Issues of health and social capital.Social Science & Medicine, in press.

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In Richardson, J. (Ed)Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L.J.D. (1992).An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnheim, C. (2002). Networks and social capital in Australian Universities. [Online]. Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies, University of Twente. Available: www.utwente.nl/cheps/documenten/susu2003/burnheim.pdf [3 July 2004].

  • Cattell, V. (2001). Poor people, poor places, and poor health: the mediating role of social networks and social capital.Social Science & Medicine 52, pp. 1501–1516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CERI (2001).The Well-being of Nations: The Role of Human and Social Capital. Paris: Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital.American Journal of Sociology 94, S 95–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, E. (2000). Paper presented at “Social Capital: What does it mean for public policy and governance structures?” seminar, (Ed, Edwards, M.) National Institute for Governance, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, E. and Caldwell, P. (2000). Making policy social. In Winter, I. (Ed)Social capital and public policy in Australia. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies pp. 43–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • DH&A (2001). National Strategy for an Ageing Australia. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, R. (2003). Social capital: a strategy for enhancing health?Social Science & Medicine 57, pp. 1723–1733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1993).The Spirit of Community: the reinvention of American society. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • FACS (2000). Stronger Families and Communities Strategy. [Online]. Department of Family and Community Services Available: http://www.facs.gov.au/sfcs [9 March 2003].

  • Faris, R. (2003). Learning Community by Community: Preparing for a Knowledge Based Society.Education Canada 43:1 Winter 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, M., Bittman, M. and Doyle, J. (2002). “The Community's Most Valuable [Hidden] Asset”—Volunteering in Australia. (SPRC 2/02). Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1995).Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galea, S., Karpati, A. and Kennedy, B. (2002). Social capital and violence in the United States, 1974–1993.Social Science & Medicine 55:8 October 2002, pp. 1373–1383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties.American Journal of Sociology 78, pp. 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward-Brown, H., Bragg, R., Leonard, R., et al. (2003). The Gift—a report on women volunteers in NSW human services. Sydney: The project was funded by an ARC grant with partner investigators: NSW Premier's Dept, Dept for Women and the NSW Council of Social Services.

  • Heckman, J. J. (2000). Policies to foster human capital.Research in Economics 54:1 March 2000, pp. 3–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, P. (1997). Conceptualizing age relations and later life. In Jamieson, A., Harper, S. and Victor, C. (Eds)—Critical Approaches to Ageing and Later Life. Buckingham, PA: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyyppä, M. and Mäki, J. (2001). Individual-level relationships between social capital and self-rated health in a bilingual community.Preventive Medicine 32:2, pp. 148–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawachi, I., Kennedy, B.P. and Glass, R. (1999). Social Capital and Self-Rated Health: A Contextual Analysis.American Journal of Public Health Volume 89:8 August 1999, pp. 1187–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendig, H. and Duckett, S. (2002).—Australian directions in aged care: the generation of policies for generations of older people. Sydney: The Australian Health Policy Institute at the University of Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, B.P., Kawachi, I., Prothrow-Stith, D., et al. (1998). Social Capital, Income Inequality, and Firearm Violent Crime.Social Science & Medicine 47:1, pp. 7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindstrôm, M. (2004). Social capital, the miniaturisation of community and self-reported global and psychological health.Social Science & Medicine 59:3 August 2004, pp. 595–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström, M., Merlo, J. and Östegren, P.-O. (2002): Individual and neighbourhood determinants of social participation and social capital: a multilevel analysis of the city of Malmö, Sweden.Social Science & Medicine 54:12 June 2002, pp. 1779–1791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström, M., Merlo, J. and Östergren, P.-O. (2003). Social capital and sense of insecurity in the neighbourhood: a population-based multilevel analysis in Malmö, Sweden.Social Science & Medicine 56, pp. 1111–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström, M., Moghaddassi, M. and Merlo, J. (2004). Individual self-reported health, social participation and neighbourhood: a multilevel analysis in Malmö, Sweden.Preventive Medicine 39:1 July 2004, pp. 135–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lochner, K., Kawachi, I., Brennan, R.T., et al. (2003). Social capital and neighborhood mortality rates in Chicago.Social Science & Medicine 56:8 April 2003, pp. 1797–1805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marmot, M. (2005). Social determinants of health inequalities.The Lancet 365:19 March 2005, pp. 1099–1104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L.L. (2004). The privatization of human services: myths, social capital and civil society.Journal of Health & Human Services Administration 27:2, pp. 175–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mugford, S. and Kendig, H. (1986). Social relations: networks and ties. In Kendig, H.L. (Ed)Ageing and Families: a support networks perspective. North Sydney: Allen & Unwin

    Google Scholar 

  • Onyx, J. (1996). Social Capital: Theory and Measurement. Sydney: Centre for Australian Community Organisations and Management (CACOM) Working Paper Series No 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patulny, R. (2003). From Family to Fellowship: Defining multiple forms of bonding social capital and pathways through values and time use analysis. Paper presented at SPRC—Social Inclusion: Australian Social Policy Conference, July 9–11, 2003, Sydney.

  • Poortinga, W. (2005). Social capital: An individual or collective resource for health?—Social Science & Medicine, in press.

  • Pope, J. (2000). Social Capital and Social Capital Indicators. A Reading List. [Online]. Public Health Development Unit. University of Adelaide Available: http://www.worldbank.org/poverty/scapital/library [2 January 2003].

  • Productivity Commission (2003). Social Capital: Reviewing the Concept and its Policy Implications. Canberra: Productivity Commission Research Paper, AusInfo.

  • Putnam, R. (1993).Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000).Bowling Alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (Ed) (2002).Democracies in flux: the evolution of social capital in contemporary society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R.D. and Feldstein, L.M. (2004),Better Together: restoring the American Community. With Don Cohen. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, C. Meanings of home in the lives of older women (and men). In M. Poole & S. Feldman (eds)A Certain Age: Women Growing Older. Sydney, Allen & Unwin, 1999, pp. 36–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, C. & Kendig, H. Social policy and research for older citizens.Australasian Journal on Ageing 18.3 Supplement, 1999, pp. 44–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, C., Touchard, D., Kendig, H., & Quine, S. (2001). Foodways of disadvantaged men growing old in the inner city: Policy issues from ethnographic research. In S. Gauthier & D. N. Weisstub & D. C. Thomasma (Eds.),

  • Stone, W., Gray, M. and Hughes, J. (2003). Social capital at work: How family, friends and civic ties relate to labour market outcomes. Research Paper No. 31 Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, W. and Hughes, J. (2002). Social capital: Empirical meaning and measurement validity. Research Paper No. 27 Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturgess, G. (1997). Taking Social Capital Seriously. In Norton, A., Latham, M., Sturgess, G. and Stewart-Weeks, M. (Eds)—Social Capital: the Individual, Civil Society and the State. Sydney: Centre for Independent Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenstra, G. (2000). Social capital, SES and health: an individual-level analysis.Social Science & Medicine 50, pp. 619–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenstra, G. and Lomas, J. (1999). Home is where the governing is: social capital and regional health governance.Health & Place 5:1, pp. 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warbuton, J. and Mutch, A. (2000. Volunteer resources: will people continue to volunteer in the next century? In Warburton, J. and Oppenheimer, M. (Eds)—Volunteers and Volunteering, Sydney: Federation Press, pp. 32–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisstub, D. (2001).Aging: Culture, Health, and Social Change (Volume 10 of the International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, pp. 191–215). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, G.C. (1994).Understanding Support Networks and Community Care. Network assessment for elderly people. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, G.C. (1995). Support network variation and informal participation in community care. In Wenger, G.C. (Ed)International Perspectives on Community Care for Older People. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, J. and Bittman, M. (2001).Volunteering: The Human Face of Democracy. Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre, UNSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, I. (Ed) (2000).Social capital and public policy in Australia. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Towards a theoretical synthesis and policy framework.Theory and Society 27:2, pp. 151–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock, M. (2000). Paper presented at “Social Capital: What does it mean for public policy and governance structures?” seminar, (Ed, Edwards, M.), National Institute for Governance, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock, M. and Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: Implications for development theory, research and policy.The World Bank Research Observer 15:2, pp. 225–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziersch, A., Baum, F., MacDougall, C., et al. (2005). Neighbourhood life and social capital: the implications for health.Social Science & Medicine 60, pp. 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Behavioural and Community Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Australia

    Felicity M. Barr & Cherry A. Russell

Authors
  1. Felicity M. Barr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cherry A. Russell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barr, F.M., Russell, C.A. Social capital—A potential tool for analysis of the relationship between ageing individuals and their social environment. Ageing Int. 31, 203–216 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02915229

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02915229

Keywords

Search

Navigation