Skip to main content
Log in

Parents on the job market: Resources and strategies that help sociologists attain tenure-track jobs

The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

When I was on the market I wanted a tenure-track job at a research institution. But I also feared, given that I had three children, and given the demands on research and teaching, that I might not be able to function effectively (Mother, first-year assistant professor, Research I University). I'm speaking as somewone who has tried to make it at a research university where the expectations are rather intense. The extent to which the structures are just not set up in ways that allow us to be really involved as caregivers. I am troubled by that (Mother, assistant professor, up for tenure, Research I University).

Abstract

Do women and men who have children during gradute school have access to the same institutional resources as non-parents? In the face of two gredy institutions, the academy and parenthood (especially motherhood), do they employ the same sorts of strategies in their quest to attain tenure-track jobs, and are those strategies successful? In this study we use a longitudinal survey of sociology Ph.D.s to investigate the availability and use of three types of resources and strategies during graduate school, and find that they all have important effects on the chances of obtaining a tenure-track position at a research or doctoral university. We find that someinstitutional resources are not equallydistributed in graduate school, with mother's least likely to obtain them, but are significant for attainment of tenure-track positions.Resource-based strategies, including presenting papers and publishing articles while in graduate school, have a positive and significant effect on all groups' attainment of tenure-track positions.Family-based strategies such as child-spacing strategies are also significant; women who have children during graduate school have lower odds of immediately obtaining tenure-track jobs at research and doctoral universities, although access to resources and the ability to use these resources helps significantly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, H.L. 1998. “Faculty Workload and Productivity: Ethnic and Gender Disparities.” Pp. 29–44. inThe NEA 1998 Almanac of Higher Education. (Washington, DC: National Education Association).

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P.D. and J.S. Long. 1990. “Departmental Effects on Scientific Productivity.”American Sociological Review 47: 615–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Association of University Professors. 2001. “Statement of Principles on Family Responsibilities and Academic Work.” Retrieved December 10, 2003 <http://www.aaup.org/statements/REPORTS/re01fam.htm>.

  • American Council of Education. 2005. “First-Tier Universities Offer Tenure-Track Career Flexibility According to American Council on Education Survey.” Press Release, Retrieved July 15, 2006 <http://www.acenet.edu/AM/Template.cfm?Section=20052&TEMPLATE =/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&CONTENTID=12020>.

  • American Psychological Association. 2004. “APA Briefing Paper on Work and Family Policy.” Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Retrieved March 3, 2006 <http://www.apa.org/ppo/issues/workandfam.html>.

  • American Sociological Association. 2003.How Does Your Department Compare? A Peer Analysis from the 2000–2001 Survey of Baccalaureate and Graduate Programs in Sociology. (Washington, DC: American Sociological Association).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellas, M.L. 1997. “The Scholarly Productivity of Academic Couples.” Pp. 156–181 inAcademic Couples: Problems and Promises, edited by M.A. Ferber and J.W. Loeb. (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, R. and Robert T. Blackburn. 1992. “Two Decades of Gains for Female Faculty.”Teachers College Records 93: 697–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C. 1999. “The Changing Character of College: Institutional Transformation in American Education.” Pp. 9–31 inThe Social Worlds of Higher Education, edited by Bernice Pescosolido and Ronald Aminzade. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, M.K. (ed.). 1988.Women in Academe. (New York: Russell Sage Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, K. 2003. “Dual Ladder Program for Career Advancement in the Academy.” Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Cole, J.R. and H. Zuckerman. 1991. “Marriage, Motherhood, and Research Performance.” Pp. 157–170 inThe Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community, edited by H. Zuckerman, J.R. Cole, and J.T. Bruer. (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.”American Journal of Sociology 94 (Supplement): S95-S120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • College and University Work/Family Association. 2005. “Building the Workplace of the Future: Flexible Career Opportunities in Academia.” Presented at Georgia Institute of Technology, February 23–26, Atlanta, GA.

  • Coser, Lewis A. 1974.Greedy Institutions: Patterns of Undivided Commitment. (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotten, S.R., J. Price, S. Keeton, R.P.D. Burton, and J.E.C. Wittekind. 2001. Reflections on the Academic Job Search in Sociology.”American Sociologist 32: 26–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, J.W. 2004. “Balancing Work and Family for Faculty: Why It's Important.”Academe 90(6): 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drago, R. and C. Colbeck. 2003.The Mapping Project: Exploring the Terrain of U.S. Colleges and Universities for Faculty and Families, Final Report to the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. (University Park, PA: Penn State University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Drago, R., A. Larson, and S. Selfe. 2001. “Patterns of Family for New PSU Faculty in the 1990s for the Faculty and Families Project.” (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State Univerisity). Retrieved November 25, 2003 <http://lsir.la/psu.edu/workfam/FFExecutiveSummary.pdf>.

  • Fox, M.F. 1991. “Gender, Environmental Milieu, and Productivity in Science.” Pp. 188–204 inThe Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community, edited by H. Zuckerman, J.R. Cole, and J.T. Bruer. (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M.F. 1996. “Are Women Succeeding in Science?” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, February, Baltimore, MD.

  • Fox, M.F. and C. Faver. 1985. “Men, Women, and Publication Productivity: Patterns among Social Work Academics.”Sociological Quarterly 26: 537–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golde, C.M. and T.M. Dorr. 2000.At Cross Purposes: What the Experiences of Today's Doctoral Students Reveal about Doctoral Education. A Survey Initiated by the Pew Charitable Trust. (Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Educational Research).

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, H.D. and N. Diamond. 1997.The Rise of American Research Universities. (Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, L., I. Kennelly, and K. Ward. 2000. “Revisiting the Gender, Marriage, and Parenthood Puzzle in Scientific Careers.”Women's Studies Quarterly 28(1,2): 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, L. and K. Ward. 1996. “The Stratification of Mentoring in Academia: Gender, Race, and Experiences of Scientists.” Institute for Behavioral Research, University of Georgia and Department of Sociology, Southern Illinois University. Unpublished paper.

  • Grant, L., K. Ward, and C. Forshner. 1992. “Mentoring Experiences of Women and Men in Physics and Astronomy”. Paper presented at the Conference on Women and Astronomy, September, Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD.

  • Grant, L. 1993. “Mentoring, Gender, and Careers of Academic Scientists.” Paper presented at the meetings of the American Educational Research Association, April, Atlanta, Georgia.

  • Hargens, L.L., J. McCann, and B.F. Reskin 1978. “Productivity and Reproductivity: Marital Fertility and Professional Achievement among Research Scientists”.Social Forces 57(1): 129–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. 1975. “Inside the Clockwork of Male Careers”. Pp. 47–80 inWomen and the Power to Change, edited by F. Howe. (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J.A. and S. Winslow. 2003. “Faculty Working Time and Gender Inequality.” Department of Sociology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, B., and H.A. Moore. 1995 “Training Sociologists: An Assessment of Professional Socialization and the Emergence of Career Aspirations”.Teaching Sociology 23: 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulis, S. 1988 “The Representation of Women in Top Ranked Sociology Departments”.The American Sociologist 19: 203–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, J.S. 1990 “The Origins of Sex Differences in Science”.Social Forces 68: 1297–1316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 2001.From Scarcity to Visibility: Gender Differences in the Careers of Doctoral Scientists and Engineers. (Washington, DC: National Academy Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J.S., P.D. Allison, and R. McGinnis. 1993. “Rank Advancement in Academic Careers: Sex Differences and the Effects of Productivity”American Sociological Review 58: 703–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, J.S. and M.F. Fox. 1995. “Scientific Careers: Universalism and Particularism”.Annual Review of Sociology 21: 45–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahaffy, Kimberly A. and Elizabeth M. Caffrey. 2003 “Are Requests for Teaching Credentials Customary? A Content Analysis of the 1999 Employment Bulletin”.Teaching Sociology 31: 203–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, M.A., and M. Goulden. 2002. “Do Babies Matter: The Effect of Family Formation on the Lieflong Careers of Academic Men and Women”.Academe 88(6): 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Education Association. 2006. Resolutions Related to Higher Education: I-52 Equal Opportunity for Women. 2005–2006 NEAResolutions I-52. Retrieved March, 6, 2006 <http://www2.nea.org/he/resolutions/heres-152.html>

  • Odell, P.M., K.O. Korgen, and Alejandro del Carmen. 2001 “Recent Trends in Faculty Employment in Sociology”.American Sociologist 32: 98–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Malley, S. 2004. “Work/Family Benefits: Not Just for Working Moms Anymore”.Women in Higher Education 13(3): 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, A.J. 2003 “Black-White Difference in Achievement: The Importance of Wealth”.Sociology of Education 76: 281–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, Barbara F. 1978a. “Scientific Productivity, Sex, and Location in the Instituion of Science”.American Journal of Sociology 83 (5): 1235–1243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1978b. “Sex Differentiation and the Social Organization of Science”.Sociological Inquiry 48: 6–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1992 “Women in Science: Conflicting Views on Where and Why”.Contemporary Sociology 21: 571–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, M. and D. Storrs. 1992. “Is That Sociology? The Accounts of Women of Color Graduate Students in Ph.D. Programs.” Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Sociological Association, August, Pittsburgh, PA.

  • Schichor, D. 1970, “Prestige of Sociology Departments and the Placing of New Ph.D's”.American Sociologist 5: 157–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S. and L.L. Leslie. 1997.Academic Capitalism. (Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnert, G. and G. Holton. 1995.Gender Differences in Science Careers: The Project Access Study. (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spalter-Roth, R.M. and W. Erskine. 2006. “resources or Rewards: The Distribution of Work-Family Policies.Research Brief (May) American Sociological Association.

  • Spalter-Roth, R.M. and S. Lee. 2000. “Gender in the Early Stages of the Sociological Career”.Research Brief 1(2), American Sociological Association.

  • Spalter-Roth, R.M., S. Lee and F.J. Levine. 2001. “Minorities at Three Stages in the Sociology Pipeline”Research Brief 2 (1), American Sociological Association.

  • Spalter-Roth, R.M. and S.S. Merola. 2001a “Preparation for the Profession and the Discipline: Faculty Mentoring and Its Outcomes in Sociology”. American Sociological Association. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Spalter-Roth, R.M. 2001b. “Early Career Pathways: Differences among Moms and Dads, Childless, Men and Childless Women in Sociology”. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, August, Anaheim, CA.

  • Ward, K. and L. Grant. 1995. “Gender and Academic Publishing”. Inhigher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. 11, edited by A.E. Bayer, J.C. Smart. (New York: Agathon)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, K. and L. Wolfe-Wendel. 2003. “Academic Life and Motherhood: Variation by Institution Type”. Paper presented at Roundtable in Faculty Work/Family Issues, American Association of University Professors and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, July 14–15, Washington, DC.

  • Williams, J. 2000.Unbeding Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do About It. (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Y. and K.A. Shauman. 1998. “Sex Differences in Research Productivity: New Evidence about an Old Puzzle”.American Sociological Review 63(6): 847–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, H. 1991. “The Careers of Men and Women Scientists: A Review of Current Research” Pp. 27–56 inThe Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community, edited by H. Zuckerman, J.R. Cole, and J.T. Bruer. (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Ivy Kennelly is assistant professor of Sociology at George Washington University, where she teaches courses in theory and the sociology of race, class, and gender. In her most recent work she takes on the “intersection” approach favored by inequality scholars, posing new metaphors to inspire the field.

A major focus of the Department is the analysis of the scientific labor market and the status of women, historical minorities, and new immigrants in the physical, biological, and social science disciplines. She can be reached at spalter-roth@asanet.org.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kennelly, I., Spalter-Roth, R.M. Parents on the job market: Resources and strategies that help sociologists attain tenure-track jobs. Am Soc 37, 29–49 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02915066

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02915066

Keywords

Navigation