Skip to main content

Cultural issues in making and using the visual problem appraisal “Kerala’s Coast”

Abstract

Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) is a complex multi-actor issue. Staff members of Cochin University (CUSAT) from India and colleagues from the Netherlands interpreted this issue as a challenge to initiate and enhance multi-stakeholder dialogue and action and the idea was born to produce a Visual Problem Appraisal (VPA). VPA is a film-based learning system that aims to induce social learning, to increase problem and policy analysis competencies, to reduce self-referentiality, to increase commitment for concerned stakeholders, and to enhance intersubjective consensus. In 2003 Indian and Dutch university staff members and Indian filmmakers produced two documentaries and 23 films portraying the Keralite stakeholders in their natural environment, exposing their engagement with, and different perspectives on, ICZM. Although produced for formal education, the notion emerged that the VPA might as well work in the reality of ICZM in Kerala. It was a fascinating conversion of questioning the nature of some events and frictions that occurred during the production process. As critical incidents were attributed to various cultural disparities such as local/foreign, male/female, higher/lower status, the hypothesis was formulated that if producing the VPA had already set a deep impact; how about using it directly with involved stakeholders? This hypothesis was tested in 2004 in workshops with publics, ranging from CUSAT students to local stakeholders of the Thycattussery Panchayat. The process of producing and testing the VPA Kerala’s Coast was a complex and intriguing multidisciplinary and multicultural project. We wondered what made the project a success. Framing the project as a space of cultural communication gave guidance to the questions that articulated our search to understand the process we had been immersed in. In this article we describe the events and analyze critical incidents that occurred during the production and the use of the VPA. The outcome leads to valuable recommendations for international and intercultural teams working on similar production and research projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Branston G. and Roy Stafford. (2003).The Media Student’s Book. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkman, B. and L.M. Witteveen. (1998).Exploring Heterogeneity. Educational Challenges in International and Intercultural Study Programmes. Wageningen (Netherlands): Leerstoelgroep Agrarische Onderwijskunde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, K.F. (2003). “Critical Incident Stress Debriefings for Cross-Cultural Workers: Harmful or Helpful?” Mobile Member Care Team Accra, Ghana. http://www.mmct.org/article9.htm (Accessed April 2005).

  • Chambers, R.. (1994). “The Origins and Practice of Participatory Rural Appraisal,”World Development, 22: 953–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, G.R., J.A. McCracken, and J.N. Pretty. (1987).Training Notes for Agroecosystem Analysis and Rapid Rural Appraisal. International Institute for Environment and Development IIED, Sustainable Agriculture Programme 2nd Edition.

  • Datta, S. (2003).Shyam Benegal, British Film Institute, Lotus collection India.

  • Everly, G.S.. (1995), “The Role of the Critical Incident Stress Debriefing Process in Disaster Counseling,”Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 17 (3): 278–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2001). “Hard Lessons for the Road Ahead, Participatory Communication and Adult Learning for Rural Development.

  • Fay, J. (2000).A Narrative Approach to Critical and Sub-Critical Incident Debriefings Dissertation http://www.narrativeapproaches.com/narrative%20papers%20folder/narrativepolicing2.htm (Accessed April 2005).

  • Freire, P.. (1971).Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G.. (1991).Cultures and Organizations, Software of the Mind. United Kingdom: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoecklin, L.. (1995).Managing Cultural Differences, Strategies for Competitive Advantage, Great Britain: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ITIM International (2005). http://www.geert-hofstede.com (Accessed May 2005).

  • Iyer, P.. (1988).Video Night in Kathmandu and Other Reports from the Not-So-Far East. Reading: Black Swan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwis, C.. (2004).Communication for Rural Innovation. Rethinking Agricultural Extension, 3rd edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lie, R. (2003).Spaces of Intercultural Communication, An Interdisciplinary Introduction to Communication, Culture, and Globalizing/Localizing Identities. Hampton Press.

  • Long, N.. (1989). “Encounters at the Interface: A Perspective on Social Discontinuities in Rural Development.”Wageningen Studies in Sociology 27, Wageningen: Wageningen Agricultural University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, I. and W. Veeneman. (2002).Games in a World of Infrastructures. Simulation-Games for Research, Learning and Intervention. Eburon Delft

  • Maxwell, N., L. John, R. Mergendoller, and Y. Bellissimo, (2004) “Developing a Problem-Based Learning Situation: An Economics Unit on Trade.”Simulation & Gaming 35 (4): 488–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. and Everly G.S. (1996).Critical Incident Stress Debriefing: An Operations Manual for the Prevention of PTSD among Emergency Services and Disaster Workers. Ellicott City, MD: Chevron Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuijen, B.. (1992).Diagnosing Organizational Cultures, Patterns of Continuance and Change, The Netherlands: Wolters-Noordhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, B. (2001).Introduction to Documentary. Indiana University Press.

  • Pretty, J.N., I. Guijt, J. Thompson, and I Scoones. (1995).Participatory Learning & Action, a Trainers Guide, London: IIED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, A., A.N. Balchand, and B. Enserink. (2002). “Assessing the Impact of Public Participation in Coastal Zone Management—An Evaluation of the Peoples’ Participatory Programmes in Coastal villages in Kerala, India.Proceedings IAIA 2002 The Hague Netherlands (CD-ROM).

  • Ramachandran, A., B. Enserink, and A.N. Balchand. (2005): “Coastal Regulation Zone Rules in Coastal Panchayats (Villages) of Kerala, India Vis-à-Vis Socio-Economic Impacts from the Recently Introduced Peoples’ Participatory Program for Local Self-Governance and Sustainable Development.Ocean and Coastal Management (48): 632–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robb, C.M. (1999 [2002]).Can the Poor Influence Policy? Participatory Poverty Assessments in the Developing World, International Monetary Fund, The World Bank, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche, C.. (1999). Impact Assessment for Development Agencies, Learning to Value Change, Oxfam, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Slim, H. and P. Thompson. (1993).Listening for a Change, Oral Testimony, and Development, London: Panos Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witteveen, L.M. (1999).Visual Problem Appraisal Rice from the Guyana’s.

  • Witteveen, L., B. Enserink, and R. Alappad. (2003a). “People on Stage, a Visual Problem Appraisal of Kerala’s Coast,”Proceedings of the International Conference: People and the Sea II—Conflicts, Threats, and Opportunities. Amsterdam, 4–6 September 2003. CD-ROM Centre for Maritime Studies MARE Amsterdam.

  • Witteveen, L.M., B. Enserink, and R. Alappad. (2003b).Visual Problem Appraisal—“Kerala’s Coast” Workbook. Hogeschool Larenstein Deventer.

  • Witteveen L.M., and B. Enserink, (2007). “Visual Problem Appraisal ‘Kerala’s Coast’ a Simulation for Social Learning on Integrated Coastal Zone Management,”Simulation & Gaming, Vol 26 No. X Special Issue on Natural Resources Management (forthcoming)

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Loes Witteveen is a lecturer in Communication and Innovation Studies at Larenstein University of Professional Education in The Netherlands. She coordinates the master programme Training, Rural Extension, and Transformation (TREAT) and produces educational films. Her international work and research interests are in rural development, (visual) learning strategies, participatory communication and media.

Bert Enserink is associate professor of policy analysis at the faculty of Technology, Policy, and Management of Delft University of Technology. His main areas of interests are participatory policy analysis, quick scan and rapid appraisal techniques, and scenario analysis. Recent research topics are public participation and social learning in coastal zone management and integrated river basin management.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Witteveen, L., Enserink, B. Cultural issues in making and using the visual problem appraisal “Kerala’s Coast”. Know Techn Pol 19, 94–118 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02914893

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02914893

Keywords

  • National Culture
  • Critical Incident
  • Power Distance
  • Uncertainty Avoidance
  • Female Director