Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of tumour and chemoradiotherapy on oesophageal motility

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background The contribution of dysmotility to dysphagia in oesophageal cancer is unclear.

Aim To examine oesophageal motility in patients with oesophageal carcinoma and to assess the effect of chemoradiotherapy on motility.

Methods Stationary manometry and 24-hour pH-metry were performed in 12 patients with oesophageal carcinoma and one week following completion of chemoradiotherapy using 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), cisplatin and 40Gy radiotherapy.

Results All patients had abnormal motility prior to treatment. Peristalsis was impaired in 11 patients with a mean (SD) of 25% (9) of waves normally propagated. Eight patients had 20% or more simultaneous waves. Following chemoradiotherapy, the percentage of waves normally propagated increased from 25% (9) to 52% (10) (p < 0.03) and normal peristalsis was restored in four patients. The percentage of simultaneous waves decreased from 38% (11) to 21.6% (10) (p=0.129) while the percentage of dropped or increased waves decreased from 20% (11) to 8.3% (4) (p=0.264).

Conclusions Oesophageal motility is disturbed in oesophageal cancer. Dysphagia in oesophageal cancer may be partly explained by oesophageal dysmotility. This is improved by chemotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Benasco C, Combalia N, Pou JM. Superficial oesophageal carcinoma: a report of 12 cases.Gastrointest Endoscopy 1985; 31: 64–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Leichman L, Steiger Z, Seydel HG et al. Preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy for patients with cancer of the oesophagus: a potentially curative approach.J Clin Oncol 1984; 2: 75–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Walsh TN, Noonan N, Keeling PWN et al. Chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Br J Surg 1993; 80: S61.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Muller JM, Erasmi H, Stelzner M et al. Surgical therapy of oesophageal carcinoma.Br J Surg 1990; 77: 845–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Walsh TN, Noonan N, Hollywood D et al. A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for oesophageal adenocarcinoma.NEJM 1996; 335(7): 462–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jazrawi S, Walsh TN, Byrne PJ et al. Cholecystectomy and oesophageal reflux: a prospective evaluation.Br J Surg 1993; 80: 50–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rothwell JF, Lawlor P, Byrne PJ et al. Cholecystectomy-induced gastroesophageal reflux: is it reduced by the laparoscopic approach?Am J Gastroenterol 1997; 92(8): 1351–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. DeMeester TR, Skinner DB. Esophageal disorders: Pathophysiology and therapy. New York, NY: Raven Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Duranceau AC, Devrode G, Lafontaine E et al. Esophageal motility in asymptomatic human volunteers.Surg Clin N Am. 1983; 63: 777–86.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nagler R, Spiro AM. Serial esophageal motility studies in asymptomatic young subjects.Gastroenterology 1961; 41: 371–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Richter JE, Wu WC, Jophns DN et al. Esophageal manometry in 95 healthy adult volunteers: variables of pressure with age and frequency of abnormal contractions.Dig Dis Sci 1977; 22: 641–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Humphries TJ, Castell DO. Pressure profile of oesopheageal peristalsis in normal humans as measures by direct intraoesopheageal transducers.Dig Dis Sci 1977; 22: 641–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Hanrahan T, Bancewicz J, Thompson D et al. Esophageal reflux responses: abnormalities of the enteric nervous system in patients with oesophageal symptoms.Br J Surg 1992; 79: 938–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Frieling T, Enck P. What are the modifications of oesophageal motility produced by balloon distension? In Giuli R, McCallum RW and Skinner DB, Primary Motility Disorders of the Oesophagus, eds. John Libbey Eurotext, Paris Londres Romes 1991: 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mann CV, Code CF, Schegel JF et al. Intrinsic mechanisms controlling the mammalian gastroesophageal sphincter deprived of extrinsic nerve supply.Thorax 1968; 23: 634–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kendall GPN, Thompson DG, Day SJ et al. Motor responses of the esophagus to intraluminal distension in normal subjects and in patients with esophageal clearance disorders.Gut 1987; 28: 272–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stein HJ, Hoeft S, DeMeester TR. Functional foregut abnormalities in Barrett’s oesophagus.J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg 1993; 105(1): 107–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to TN Walsh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tormey, S., Nasyr, A., McNamara, D. et al. Effect of tumour and chemoradiotherapy on oesophageal motility. Ir J Med Sci 172, 9–12 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02914777

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02914777

Keywords

Navigation