Skip to main content
Log in

Ready-to-use DNA extracted with a CTAB method adapted for herbarium specimens and mucilaginous plant tissue

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Plant Molecular Biology Reporter Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This report summarizes major changes in previously published protocols for DNA extraction to improve the quality of DNA extracted from plants. Here, we highlight the critical modifications in the original protocols. The efficiency of these changes results in high-quality DNA ready to use in a variety of phytogenetically distant plant families, in particular species with mucopolysaccharides. The DNA obtained can be used without further purification in various molecular biology assays, including direct sequencing and AFLP and RAPD (random-amplified polymorphic DNA) analyses. The effectiveness of this method is proven by the amplification and sequencing of PCR products of up to 1 kb with DNA extracted from herbarium tissue ≥60 years old. This versatility is not usually found in DNA extraction protocols. In addition, this method is quick, adaptable to standard laboratories, and most important, safer and more cost-effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CsCl:

cesium chloride

NaCl:

sodium chloride

NaOAc:

sodium oxaloacetate

RAPD:

random amplified polymorphic DNA

SEVAG:

chloroformsisoamyl alcohol

References

  • Biss P, Freeland J, Silvertown J, McConway K, and Lutman P (2003) Successful amplification of rice chloroplast microsatellites from century-old grass samples from the Park Grass Experiment. Plant Mol Biol Rep 21: 249–257.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng YJ, Guo WW, Yi HL, Pang XM, and Deng X (2003) An efficient protocol for genomic DNA extraction fromCitrus species. Plant Mol Biol Rep 21: 177a-177g.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeCastro O and Mendle B (2004) PCR amplification of Michele Teniere’s historical specimens and facility to utilize an alternative approach to resolve taxonomic problems. Taxon 53: 147–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drábková L, Kirschner J, and Vlcek C (2002) Comparison of seven DNA extractions in amplification protocols in historical herbarium specimens of Juncaceae. Plant Mol Biol Rep 20: 161–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang G, Hammar S, and Grumet R (1992) A quick and inexpensive method for removing polysaccharides from plant genomic DNA. Biofeedback 13: 52–54.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Golenberg EM (1999) Isolation, identification, and authentication of DNA sequences derived from fossil material. In: Jones TP and Rowe NP (eds), Fossil Plants and Spores: Modern Techniques, pp 156–160, The Geological Society, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith MP and Porter JM (2003) Back to basics: A simple method of DNA extraction for mucilaginous cacti. Bradleya 21: 126–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankowiak K, Buczkowska K, and Szweykowka-Kulinska S (2005) Successful extraction of DNA from 100-year-old herbarium specimens of the liverwortBazzania trilobata. Taxon 54: 335–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li YX, Su ZX, and Chen F (2002) Rapid extraction of genomic DNA from leaves and bracts of dove tree (Davidia involucrata). Plant Mol Biol Rep 20: 185a-185e.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodhi MA, Ye G, Weeden NF, and Reisch BI (1994) A simple and efficient method for DNA extraction from grapevine cultivars andVitis species. Plant Mol Biol Rep 12: 6–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murray MG and Thompson WF (1980) Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 8: 4321–4325.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson AH, Brubaker CL and Wendel JF (1993) A rapid method for extraction of cotton (Gossypium spp.) genomic DNA suiPorebski S, Bailey LG, and Baum BR (1997) Modification of a CTAB DNA extraction protocols for plants containing high polysaccharide and polyphenol components. Plant Mol Biol Rep 15: 8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porebski S, Bailey LG, and Baum BR (1997) Modification of a CTAB DNA extraction protocol for plants containing high polysaccharide and polyphenol components. Plant Mol Biol Rep 15: 8–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saghai-Maroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgensen RA, and Allard RW (1986) Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81: 8014–8018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soltis PS and Soltis PE (1993) Ancient DNA: Prospects and limitations. New Zealand J Bot 31: 203–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taberlet P, Gielly L, Pautou G, and Bouvet J (1991) Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of cpDNA. Plant Mol Biol 17: 1105–1109.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JW and Swann EC (1994) DNA from herbarium specimens. In: Hermann B and Hummel S (eds), Ancient DNA, pp 166–181, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tel-Zur NS, Abbo S, Myslabodksi D, and Mizrahi Y (1999) Modified CTAB procedure for DNA isolation from epiphytic cacti of the generaHylocereus andSelenicereus (Cactaceae). Plant Mol Biol Rep 17: 249–254.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf PG, Soltis PS, and Soltis DE (1994) Phylogenetic, relationships of Dennstaedtioid ferns: Evidence fromrbcL. Mol Phylogenet Evol 3: 383–392.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Hugo Cota-Sánchez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cota-Sánchez, J.H., Remarchuk, K. & Ubayasena, K. Ready-to-use DNA extracted with a CTAB method adapted for herbarium specimens and mucilaginous plant tissue. Plant Mol Biol Rep 24, 161–167 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02914055

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02914055

Key words

Navigation