Skip to main content

Video-assisted lobectomy in elderly lung cancer patients

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated the pre-, intra-and postoperative outcome of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy in elderly lung cancer patients to determine what factors may be disadvantageous.Methods: From June 1982 to May 2000, 707 patients underwent pulmonary resection for primary lung cancer. Of these, 87 patients with t1–2 peripheral lung cancer underwent lobectomy and postoperative pulmonary function tests and postoperative conditions at an average of 2.3 months postoperatively. Of these, 52 underwent video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy since 1994 and 35 lobectomy by standard thoracotomy.Results: Vedeo-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy offered advantages in blood loss, chest wall damage, and minimal performance deterioration status. The percent vital capacity, percent forced expiratory in 1 second, and percent maximum ventilatory volume were well preserved in patients who underwent video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified operation duration as an independent risk factor in morbidity and operative procedure as an independent risk factor in performance deterioration. In stage IA and IB patients, 3-year-survival was 92.9% and 5-year survival 53.8% in those undergoing lobectomy by standard thoracotomy and 84.2% at 3 years and 60.1% at 5-years in those undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy.Conclusion: We thus consider video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy in this age group to be an effective procedure, but the long surgical duration is a risk factor in a poor clinical outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Lewis RJ. The role of video-assisted thoracte surgery for carcinoma of the lung: wedge resection to lobectomy by simultaneous individual stapling. Ann Thorac Surg 1993, 56: 762–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Koizumi K, Tanaka S, Haraguchi S, Matsushima S, Gomibuchi M, Akiyama H, et al. Evaluation of the prognosis of patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer with respect to predicted postoperative lung function (Eng abstr). J Jpn Assn Thorac Surg 1996. 44: 162–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jaklitsh, MT, Buerno R, Swanson SJ, Mentzer SJ, Lukanich JM, Sugarbaket DJ. Major review by new surgical options for elderly lung cancer patients. Cleck. 1999, 116 (Suppl 6): 480S-5

    Google Scholar 

  4. Koizumi K, Tanaka S, Shioda M, Haraguchi S, Masaki Y, Morota T, et al. Simplified prediction of postoperative lung function by plain chest roentgenogram in patients with primary lung cancer in correlation to postoperative respiratory complications (Eng abstr) J Jpn Assn Thorac Surg 1991, 39: 1758–64.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ginsberg RJ, Hill LD, Eagan RT, Thomas P, Mountam CF, Deslauriers J, et al. Modern 30-day operative mortality for surgical resections in lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983, 86: 654–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lung Cancer Study Group (Ginsberg RJ, Rubinstein LV). Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60: 615–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ginsberg RJ. Alternative (muscle sparing) incisions in thoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1993; 56: 752–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kirby TJ, Mack MJ, Landreneau RJ, Rice TW. Lobectomy-video-assisted thoracic surgery versus muscle-sparing thoractomy. A randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 109: 997–1002.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hallfeldt KK, Siebeck M, Thetter O, Schweiberer L. The effect of thoracic surgery on pulmonary function. American J of Critical Care 1995; 4: 352–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stamatis G, Fechner S. Video thoracoscopic lobectomy Surgical technique and results. Chirurg 1996, 67: 425–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Walker WS, Craig SR. Video-assisted thoracoscopie pulmonary surgery—current status and potential evaluation. European J Cardio-Thoracic Surg 1996; 10: 161–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Furrer M, Rechsteiner R, Eigenmann V, Singer C, Althaus U, Ris HB. Thoracotomy and thoracoscopy postoperative pulmonary function pain and chest wall complant. European J Cardio-Thoracic Surg 1997, 12: 82–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Koizumi K, Haraguchi S, Akiyama H, Mikami I, Fukushima M, Tanaka S. VATS lobectomy for primary lung cancer: experiences based on provisional indications. Surgery Today 1998; 28: 36–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Landreneau RJ, Sugarbaker DJ, Mack MJ, Hazelriggs SR, Luketich JD, Fetterman L, et al. Wedge resection versus lobectomy for stage I (TIN0M0) non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovase Surg 1997; 113: 563–72.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koizumi, K., Haraguchi, S., Hirata, T. et al. Video-assisted lobectomy in elderly lung cancer patients. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 50, 15–22 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02913481

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02913481

Key words

  • video-assisted thoracic surgery
  • lobectomy
  • lung cancer
  • pulmonary function
  • performance status