Skip to main content
Log in

Taxonomic revision of the genusPinguicula L. in the Iberian Peninsula

  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the genusPinguicula is revised in the Iberian Peninsula. The taxa studied areP. vulgaris, P. nevadensis, P. grandiflora subsp.grandiflora, P. dertosensis, P. vallisneriifolia, P. longifolia subsp.longifolia, P. mundi, P. alpina andP. lusitanica. Five taxa are endemic to the area studied (P. nevadensis, P. dertosensis, P. vallisneriifolia, P. longifolia subsp.longifolia andP. mundi). Two of them are confined to restricted areas:P. nevadensis is endemic to the Sierra Nevada (S Spain) andP. longifolia subsp.longifolia is endemic to the central Pyrenees (N Spain). Taxonomical, nomenclatural, morphological, chromosomal, biogeographical and ecological data are reported for each taxon. A new combination is proposed:Pinguicula Sect.Longifolia (Casper) G. Blanca, M. Ruíz-Rejón etR. Zamora.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguilella A., Tirado J. &Villaescusa C. (1992): Consideraciones sobre el géneroPinguicula en la provincia de Castellón.Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 50: 121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolòs O. &Vigo J. (1983): Notes sobre taxonomia i nomenclatura de les plantes, II.Collect. Bot. (Barcelona) 14: 89–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton N.L. &Brown A. (1913):An illustrated flora of the Northern United States. Ed. 2. Charles Scribner’s sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cañigueral J. (1957): Una variedad dePinguicula grandiflora en los montes cercanos a Tortosa:Pinguicula grandiflora Lamk. var.dertosensis nova.Collect. Bot. (Barcelona) 5: 413–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casper S.J. (1962): Revision der GattungPinguicula in Eurasien.Feddes Repert. 66: 1–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casper S.J. (1963): Gedanken zur Gliederung der GattungPinguicula L.Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 82: 321–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casper S.J. (1966): Monographie der GattungPinguicula L.Biblioth. Bot. 127/128: 1–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casper S.J. (1972):Pinguicula L. In:Tutin T.G., Heywood V.H., Burges N.A., Moore D.M., Valentine D.H., Walters S.M. &Webb D.A. (eds.),Flora europaea 3, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 294–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contandriopoulos J. (1962): Recherches sur la flore endemique de la Corse et sur ses origines.Ann. Fac. Sci. Marseille 32: 1–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coutinho A.X.P. (1939):Flora de Portugal. Ed. 2. Ailland, Alves & Cia, Lisboa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cueto M. (1989):Los recursos vegetales de las Sierras de María y Orce como base para la gestión de un espacio natural. Ph.D. thesis, Universidad de Granada, Granada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cueto M. &Blanca G. (1997):Flora del Parque Natural “Sierra de María-Los Vélez”. SAHN, Almería.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doulat E. (1947): Recherches caryologiques sur quelques.Pinguicula. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris 225: 354–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk D.A. &Holsinger K.E. (1991):Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • García M.B. &Antor R.J. (1992): Variabilidad fenotípica de un endemismo localizado en islas ecológicas:Pinguicula longifolia subsp.longifolia (Lentibulariaceae).Pirineos 139: 97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givnish T.J. (1989): Ecology and evolution of carnivorous plants. In:Abrahamson W.G. (ed.),Plant-animal interactions, McGraw Hill, New York, pp. 243–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera C., Zamora R., Benavente A., Luque P. &Nieto R. (1994): Pinguicula vallisneriifolia.Planes de Actuación de las Especies Vegetales Amenazadas. Agencia de Medio Ambiente, Sevilla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heslop-Harrison Y. (1978): Plantas carnívoras.Invest. Ci. 19: 56–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock A.S. & Green M.L. (1929): Standard-species of Linnaean genera ofPhanerogamae (1753–1754). In:Int. Bot. Congr. Cambridge (England), 1930, Nomencl. Prop. Brit. Bot., pp. 111–199.

  • Jarvis C.E., Barrie F.R., Allan D.M. & Reveal, J.L. (1993) (eds): A list of Linnaean generic names and their types.Regnum Veg. 127: 1–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juniper B.E., Robins R.J. &Joel D.M. (1989):The carnivorous plants. Academic Press, London et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondo K. (1969): Chromosome numbers of carnivorous plants.Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 96: 322–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laane M.M. (1967): Chromosome numbers in the flora of eastern Finmark. II.Blyttia 25: 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laane M.M. (1969): Further chromosome studies in Norwegian vascular plants.Blyttia 27: 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnaeus C. (1737):Flora lapponica. Salomonem Schouten, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löve A. &Kjellqvist E. (1974): Cytotaxonomy of spanish plants. IV. Dicotyledons:Caesalpinaceae-Asteraceae.Lagascalia 4: 153–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löve A. &Löve D. (1944): Cytotaxonomical studies on boreal plants. III. Some new chromosome numbers of Scandinavian plants.Arkiv. Bot. 31A, 12: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löve A. &Löve D. (1948): Chromosome number of Northern plant species.Rept. Dept. Agric. Univ. Inst. Appl. Sci. (Iceland), Ser. B 3: 9–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löve A. &Löve D. (1956): Cytotaxonomical conspectus of the Icelandic flora.Acta Horti Gothob. 20: 65–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löve A. & Löve D. (1982): [Report]. In:Löve A. & Löve D. (eds.), IOPB Chromosome number reports LXXV,Taxon 31: 344–360.

  • Mateo G. &Crespo M.B. (1995):Flora abreviada de la Comunidad Valenciana. Ed. Gamma, Alicante.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murín A. (1976): Index of chromosome numbers of Slovakian flora. Part 5.Acta Fac. Rerum Nat. Univ. Comenianae, Bot. 25: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murín A., Háberová I. &C. Žamsran C. (1980): Karyological studies of some species of the Mongolian flora.Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 15: 395–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivas Martínez S., Díaz T.E., Prieto J.A.F., Loidi J. &Penas A. (1984):Los Picos de Europa. Ed. Leonesas, León.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schemske D.W., Husban B.C., Ruckelshaus M.H., Goodwillie C., Parker I.M. &Bishop J. (1994): Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants.Ecology 75: 584–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schotsman H.D. (1970): Contribution à la caryologie des angiospermes de la Sologne et du Val de Loire.Bull. Cent. Ètud. Rech. Sci. 8: 21–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennen F. (1936): Plantes d’Espagne. Diagnoses et comentaires. Troisième partie.Bol. Soc. Ibér. Ci. Nat. 35: 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood C.E. &Godfrey R.K. (1957):Pinguicula (Lentibulariaceae) in the southeastern United States.Rhodora 59: 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamora R., Jamilena M., Ruíz Rejón M. &Blanca G. (1996): Two new species of the carnivorous genusPinguicula (Lentibulariaceae) from Mediterranean habitats.Pl. Syst. Evol. 200: 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blanca, G., Ruíz-Rejón, M. & Zamora, R. Taxonomic revision of the genusPinguicula L. in the Iberian Peninsula. Folia Geobot 34, 337–361 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02912819

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02912819

Keywords

Navigation