Skip to main content
Log in

Selected chromosome counts of the Czechoslovak flora III

  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 March 1992

Abstract

Chromosome numbers compared with as yet published data are given for the following 12 Phanerogams (both native species and aliens) from Czechoslovakia:Ambrosia trifida L.,Cardamine chelidonia L.,Dephne cneorum L.,Epipactis albensis Nováková etRydlo,Linum flavum L.subsp flavum, Lunaria rediviva L.,Nepeta grandiflora M.BIEB.,Reseda luteola L.,Thlaspi montanum L.,Tithymalus salicifolius (Host)Klotzsch etGarcke,Tithymalus virgultosus (Klokov) Holub andVerbascum speciosum Schrad. subsp.speciosum. The chromosome number 2n=40 is presented for the first time in autogamousEpipactis albensis Nováková etRydlo. New chromosome numbers were found inCardamine chelidonia L. (2n=32) and inTithymalus salicifolius (Host) Klotzch etGarcke (2n=40). Known but less frequent cytotypes are reported inLinum flavum L. subsp.flavum (2n=28) and inVerbascum speciosum Schrad. subsp.speciosum (2n=30).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Baksay L. (1958): The chromosome numbers of Ponto-Mediterranean plant species.—Ann. Hist.-Nat. Mus. Natl. Hungarici, 50 (Ser. nova 9): 121–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttler K.P. (1985): Chromosomenzahlen von Gefässpflanzen aus Hessen (und angrenzenden Ländern), 3. Folge.—Hessische Floristische Briefe, 34/3: 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chennaveeraiah M.S. etJoshi K.K. (1983): Karyotypes in cultivated and wild species ofLinum.— Cytologia 48: 833–841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedorov A.A. (ed.), (1969): Chromosome numbers of flowering plants.—Leningrad.

  • Fernandez-Peralta A.M. etGonzalez-Aguilera J.J. (1982): Cytogenetic and evolutionary studies on the Spanish species ofReseda L.: SectionLuteola Dumort. (Resedaceae).—Taxon, 31/1: 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldblatt P. (ed.), (1981): Index to plant chromosome numbers 1975–1978.—Monographs in Syst. Bot. from the Missouri Botanical Garden, 5.

  • Goldblatt P. (ed.), (1984): Index to plant chromosome numbers 1979–1981.—Monographs in Syst. Bot. from the Missouri Botanical Garden, 8.

  • Goldblatt P. (ed.), (1985): Index to plant chromosome numbers 1982–1983.—Monographs in Syst. Bot. from the Missouri Botanical Garden, 13.

  • Goldblatt P. (ed.), (1988): Index to plant chromosome numbers 1984–1985.—Monographs in Syst. Bot. from the Missouri Botanical Garden, 23.

  • Goldblatt P. etJohnson D.E. (eds.), (1990): Index to plant chromosome numbers 1986–1987.—Monographs in Syst. Bot. from the Missouri Botanical Garden, 30.

  • Holub J. (1970):Epipactis leptochila (Godf.) Godf. undE. muelleri Godf.—neue Arten der tschechoslowakischen Flora.—Preslia, Praha, 42: 330–349. [In Czech, German summary.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Holub J. (1991):Nepeta grandiflora found established in Prague.—Zpr. Čs. Bot. Společ., Praha, 26: 19–31. [In Czech, English summary.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurusawa I. etShimoyama S. (1976): Die Mannigfaltigkeit der Chromosomenzahl bei der GattungEuphorbia.—Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen, 52: 255–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jílek V. (1961):Cardamine chelidonia L. in the Šumperk area.—Preslia, Praha, 33: 199. [In Czech.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Krahulcová A. (1988): Selected chromosome counts of the Czechoslovak flora I.—Folia Geobot. Phytotax., Praha, 23: 375–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krahulcová A. (1990): Selected chromosome counts of the Czechoslovak flora II.—Folia Geobot. Phytotax., Praha, 25: 381–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kučera J. (1991):Cardamine chelidonia in der Tschechischen Republik.—Zpr. Čs. Bot. Společ., Praha, 26: 39–42. [In Czech, German summary.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Löve Á. (1983): IOPB chromosome number reports LXXXI.—Taxon, 32/4: 663–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löve Á. etLöve D. (1974): Cytotaxonomical atlas of the Slovenian flora.—Lehre.

  • Májovský J., Murín A. et al. (1987): Karyotaxonomical survey of Slovakian flora.—Bratislava. [In Slovak.]

  • Manton I. (1932): Introduction to the general cytology of theCruciferae.—Ann. Botany, 46/183: 509–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore D.M. (1982): Flora Europaea. Check-list and chromosome index.—Cambridge.

  • Moore R.J. (ed.), (1974): Index to plant chromosome numbers for 1972.—Regnum Vegetabile, Utrecht, 91.

  • Nováková H. etRydlo J. (1978):Epipactis albensis—a new aurogamous species from theEpipactis helleborine species aggregate (Orchidaceae).—Preslia, Praha, 50: 161–171. [In Czech, English summary.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogan E. et al. (1988): Further studies in chromosome numbers of Polish Angiosperms. Part XXI.—Acta Biol. Cracov., Ser. Bot., 30: 119–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rydlo J. (1989): Comments on the distribution and ecology of some species of the genusEpipactis.—Muzeum a současnost, Roztoky, ser. natur., 3: 5–33. [In Czech, English summary.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugiura T. (1937): A list of chromosome numbers in Angiospermous plants IV—Proc. Imp. Acad. Tokyo, 13/10: 430.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02854661.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krahulcová, A. Selected chromosome counts of the Czechoslovak flora III. Folia geobot. phytotax. 26, 369–377 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02912771

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02912771

Keywords

Navigation