Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 113–135 | Cite as

Live and dead underground plant biomass in a natural meadow hydrosere

  • Karel Fiala
Article

Abstract

In seven meadow stands of natural hydroseres the average total underground biomass ranged from 1.6 to 3.7 kg. m−2. The highest percentages of live roots (46–60%) and live underground biomass (1.40–1.61 kg. m−2) were recorded in stands situated around the middle of the hydroseres and the lowest values (18%; 0.48 kg. m−2 and 23%; 0.86 kg. m−2) were both on the wettest and the driest sites. The total underground/aboveground biomass ratios varied between 3.2 and 12.2 while the live underground/aboveground biomass ratios lay between 0.7 and 3.4.

Keywords

Meadow stands Live root biomass Vertical distribution of root biomass Underground biomass partitioning Root/shoot ratio 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Balátová-Tuláčková E. (1985): Übersicht der Vegetationseinheiten der Wiesen im Landschaftsschutzgebiet Ždárské vrchy II.—Preslia, Praha, 57: 247–261.Google Scholar
  2. Balátová-Tuláčková E., Tesařová M. etZelená V. (1977): Synökologische Charakteristik einiger wichtiger Wiesentypen des Naturschutzgebietes “Ždárské vrchy”.—Rozpravy Čs. Akad. Věd., Praha, 87; 1–115.Google Scholar
  3. Bár I. (1984): Statistické vyhodnocení základních klimatických údajů ze stanice Svratouch.— Zpráva o projektu Kameničky č. 37, ÚSEB ČSAV, Brno, p. 1–5.Google Scholar
  4. Bernard J. M. etFiala K. (1986): Distribution and standing crop of living and dead roots in three wetlandCarex species.—Bull. Torrey Bot. Club, New York, 113: 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernard J. M., Solander D. etKvět J. (1988): Production and nutrient dynamics inCarex wetlands.—Aquatic Botany, Amsterdam, 30: 125–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brouwer R. (1966): Root growth of grasses and cereals.—In:Milthorpe F. L. etIvins J. D. [eds.]: The growth of cereals and grasses, London, p. 153–166.Google Scholar
  7. Coleman D. C. etSasson A. (1978): Decomposer subsystem.—In:Breymeyer A. J. etVan Dyne G. M. (eds.): Grasslands, systems analysis and man, International biological programme 19, Cambridge, p. 609–655.Google Scholar
  8. Davidson R. L. (1969a): Effect of root/leaf temperature differentials on root/shoot ratios in some pasture grasses and clover.—Ann. Bot., London, 33: 561–569.Google Scholar
  9. Davidson R. L. (1969b): Effect of soil nutrients and moisture on root/shoot ratios inLolium perenne L. andTrifolium repens L.—Ann. Bot., London, 33: 571–577.Google Scholar
  10. Davies R. G. (1971): Computer programming in quantitative biology.—London, p. 1–492.Google Scholar
  11. Dennis J. G. (1977): Distribution patterns of belowground standing crop in arctic tundra at Barrow, Alaska.— In:Marshall J. K. [ed.]: The belowground ecosystem: A synthesis of plant-associated processes, Range Sci. Dep. Sci. Ser. No. 26, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, p. 53–62.Google Scholar
  12. Dennis J. G., Tiezen L. L. etVetter M. A. (1978): Seasonal dynamics of above-and belowground production of vascular plants at Barrow Alaska.—In: Vegetation and production ecology of an Alaskan arctic tundra, New York, p. 113–140.Google Scholar
  13. Druzina V. D. (1980): Sezonnaja i raznogodičnaja dinamika zapasov i chimizma podzemnoj pastitelnoj massy lugovych soobščestv.—Bot. Žurn., Leningrad, 65: 677–685.Google Scholar
  14. Druzina V. D. etMakarevič V. N. (1973): K metodike izučenia obščich i po-frakcionnych zapasov rastitelnoj massy i zolnogo sostava lugovych rastitelnych soobščestv.—Bot. Žurn., Leningrad, 58: 1726–1734.Google Scholar
  15. Evdokimova T. I. etGrišina L. A. (1968): Productivity of root systems of herbaceous vegetation on flood plain meadows and methods for its study.—In:Rodin L. E. [ed]: Methods of productivity studies in root systems and rhizosphere organisms, Leningrad, p. 24–27.Google Scholar
  16. Fiala K. (1976): Underground organs ofPhragmites communis, their growth, biomass, and net production.—Folia Geobot. Phytotax., Praha, 11: 225–259.Google Scholar
  17. Fiala K. (1983): Annual production and turnover rate of underground plant biomass in a grassland stand—Polygalo-Nardetum.—In:Böhm W., Kutschera L. etLichtenegger E. [eds.] Root ecology and its practical application, Int. Symp. Gumpenstein, 1982, Irdning, p. 447 to 452.Google Scholar
  18. Fiala K. (1986): Roční produkce a rychlost obratu podzemní biomasy lučních porostů Českomoravské vrchoviny.—Folia Phytotechnica, ÚEFT ČSAV Brno, p. 140–147.Google Scholar
  19. Fiala K. (1988): Biomasa živých a mrtvých kořenů travinných porostů a její změny pod antropogenním tlakem.—Rostl. Výr., Praha, 34: 159–168.Google Scholar
  20. Fiala K. (1980): Underground biomass of three typical grass stands growing on areas deforested by air-pollution.—Ekológia (ČSSR), 8: 105–115.Google Scholar
  21. Fiala K. etHerrera R. (1988): Living and dead belowground biomass and its distribution in some savanna communities in Cuba.—Folia Geobot. Phytotax., Praha, 23: 225–237.Google Scholar
  22. Fiala K. etStudený V. (1987): Cutting and fertilization effect on the root system in several grassland stands. I. Impact on the living and dead root biomass.—Ekológia (ČSSR), Bratislava, 6: 389–402.Google Scholar
  23. Fiala K. etStudený V. (1988): Cutting and fertilization effect on the root system in several grassland stands. II. Vertical distribution of root bicmass and changes in the carbohydrate content.—Ekológia (ČSSR), Bratislave, 7: 27–42.Google Scholar
  24. Fiala K., Jakrlová J. etZelená V. (1989): Biomass partitioning in twoCalamagrostis villosa stands on deforested sites.—Folia Geobot. Phytotax., Praha, 24: 207–210.Google Scholar
  25. Gáborčík N. (1985): Zmeny koreňového systému trvalého trávného porastu vplyvom minerálného hnojenia.—In:Gáborčík N. [ed.]: Ekológia trávného porastu II., Bánská Bystrica, p.44 až 45.Google Scholar
  26. Harrach T. etKunzmann G. (1983): Wurzelverteilung von Grünlandgesallschaften in verschiedenen Böden unterschiedlichen ökologischen Feuchtegrades.—In:Böhm W., Kutschera L. etLichtenegger E. [eds.]: Root ecology and its practical application, Int. Symp. Gumpenstein, 1982, Irdning, p. 335–342.Google Scholar
  27. Ignatenko J. V., Kirilova V. P. etPonjatovskaja V. M. (1968): The dynamics of plant biomass in lowgrass-herbaceous community.—In:Rodin L. E. [ed.]: Methods of productivity studies in root systems and rhizosphere organisms, Leningrad, p. 66–71.Google Scholar
  28. Jakrlová J. (1971): Flooded meadow communities. An analysis of productivity in a dry year.— Folia Geobot. Phytotax., Praha, 6: 1–27.Google Scholar
  29. Jakrlová J. (1975): Primary production and chemical composition in flood-plain meadow.— Acta Sci. Natur., Brno, 9(9): 1–52.Google Scholar
  30. Jančovič J. (1985): Vplyv hnojenia na koreňovú biomasu trávnych porastov.—Agrochémia, 25: 43–45.Google Scholar
  31. Jelina G. A., Kuzněcov O. L. etMaksimov A. I. (1984): Strukturno-funkcionalnaja organizacija i dinamika bolotnych ekosistem Karellii.—Leningrad.Google Scholar
  32. Jurkevič I. D. etŠčerbač S. R. (1980): Rol dominantov i drugich komponentov pojmennych lugovych fitocenozov v akumulacii i krugovorote elementov pitanija.—Bot.Žurn., Leningrad, 65: 323–334.Google Scholar
  33. Kotańska M. (1967): Biomass dynamics of underground plant organs in some grassland communities of the Ojców national Park.—Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci., Sér. Sci. Biol., Warszawa, 15: 625to631.Google Scholar
  34. Kotańska M. (1970): Morfologia i biomasa podziemnych organów rostlin w zbirowiskach lakowych Ojcowskiego Parku Narodowego.—Studia Natur., Ser. A, Kraków, 4: 1–107.Google Scholar
  35. Kotańska M. (1973): Productivity of underground plant organs on some meadow and marsh communities of the Niepolomice forest (Southern Poland).—Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci., Ser. Sci. Biol., Warszawa, 21: 555–560.Google Scholar
  36. Kotańska M. (1975a): Primary productivity in the meadow of theHieracio-Nardetum strictae association in the Gorce mountains (Southern Poland).—Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci., Ser. Sci. Biol., Warsawa, 23: 623–627.Google Scholar
  37. Kotańska M. (1975b): Sezonowe zmiany biomasy organów podziemnych roślin w wybranych zbirowiskach lakowych.—Zeszyty Naukowe Uniw. Jagellońskiego, Prace Botaniczne, Kraków, 395: 23–47.Google Scholar
  38. Kotańska M. (1977): Sezonowe zmiany roślinności i tendencje sukcesyjne w placie zespoluHieracio-Nardetum strictae w Gorcach (Karpaty Zachodnie).—Zeszyty Naukove Uniw. Jagiellońskiego, Prace Botaniczne, Kraków, 462: 71–109.Google Scholar
  39. Krajčovič V. (1987): Produkčné a mimoprodukčné zmeny v trávnych ekosystémoch pri rôznej intenzite hnojenia.—In:Krajčovič V. [ed.]: Teória a prax v odvetví lukárstva, pasienkárstva a trávnych porastov, Banská Bystrica, p. 225–234.Google Scholar
  40. Krajčovič V. (1988): Hodnota poloprírodných a prírodných trávnych porastov v ekosystéme horských oblastí.—Rostl. Výr., Praha, 34: 115–124.Google Scholar
  41. Lorenz R. (1977): Changes in root weight and distribution in response to fertilization and harvest treatment of mixed prairie.—In:Marshall J. K. [ed.]: The belowground ecosystem: A synthesis of plant-associated processes, Range Sci. Dep. Sci. No. 26, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, p. 63–71.Google Scholar
  42. Mähr E. etGrabherr G. (1983): Wurzelwachstum und Production in einem Krummseggenrasen (Caricetum curvulae) des Hochalpen.—In:Böhm W., Kutschera L. etLichtenegger E. [eds.]: Root ecology and its practical application, Int. Symp. Gumpenstein, 1982, Irdning p. 405–416.Google Scholar
  43. Máthé I., Précsényi I. etZólyomi B. (1967): Phytomass investigations in different ecosystems at Újszentmargita.—Acta Bot. Acad. Sci. Hung., 13: 239–257.Google Scholar
  44. Matveeva E. P. (1967): Luga sovětskoj Pribaltiki.—Leningrad.Google Scholar
  45. Midorikawa B., Shimada Y., Iwaki H. etOhga N. (1975): Root production in semi-natural grassland community dominated byMiscanthus sinensis in the Kawatabi area.—In:Numata M. [ed.]: Productivity of terrestrial communities, JIBP Synthesis, Tokyo, 13, p. 114–122.Google Scholar
  46. Muc M. (1977): Ecology and primary production of sedge-moos meadow communities. Truelove Lowland.—In:Bliss L. C. [ed.]: Truelove Lowland, Devon Island, Canada: A high Arctic ecosystem. Univ. of Alberta Press, Alberta, p. 157–184.Google Scholar
  47. Nilsson J. (1970): Notes on the biomass and productivity of belowground organs of a South-Swedish Hay-meadow.—Bot. Notiser, Lund, 123: 183–194.Google Scholar
  48. Pearsall W. H. etGorham E. (1956): Production ecology I. Standing crops of natural vegetation. —Oikos, Copenhagen, 7: 193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pilát A. (1969): Underground dry weight in the grassland communities ofArrhenatheretum elatioris alopecuretosum pratensis R. Tx. 1937 andMesobrometum erecti stipetosum Vicherek 1960.—Folia Geobot. Phytotax., Praha, 4: 225–234.Google Scholar
  50. Plewczynska-Kuraš U. (1976): Estimation of biomass of the underground parts of meadow herbage in the three variants of fertilization.—Pol. Ecol. Stud., 2: 63–74.Google Scholar
  51. Précsényi I. (1969): Analysis of the primary production (phytobiomass) in anArtemisio-Festucetum pseudovinae.—Acta. Bot. Acad. Sci. Hung., Budapest, 15: 309–325.Google Scholar
  52. Précsényi I. (1970): A study on the energy budget inArtemisio-Festucetum pseudovinae.— Acta Bot. Acad. Sci. Hung., Budapest, 16: 179–185.Google Scholar
  53. Rusek J., Úlehlová B. etUnar J. (1975): Soil biological features of some alpine grasslands in Czechoslovakia.—In: Progress in soil zoology, Praha, p. 199–215.Google Scholar
  54. Rychnovská M., Květ J., Gloser J. etJarklová J. (1972): Plant water relations in three zones of grassland.—Acta Sci. Natur., Brno, 6(5): 1–38.Google Scholar
  55. Schuster J. L. (1964): Root development of native plants under three grazing intensities.— Ecology, Durham, 45: 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schuurman J. J. (1971): Effect of supplemental fertilization on growth of oats with restricted root development.—Zeitschr. Acker-Pflanzenbau, Berlin, 133: 315–320.Google Scholar
  57. Schuurman J. J. (1980): root and crop growth of oats as affected the length of periods of high water-table.—Neth. J. Agric. Sci., 28: 20–28.Google Scholar
  58. Seischab F. K., Bernard J. M. etFiala K. (1985): Above-and belowground standing crop partitioning of biomass byEleocharis rostellata Torr in the Byron-Bergen Swamp, Genesee County, New York.—Amer. Midl. Natur. Notre Dame, 114: 70–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shaver G. R. etBillings W. D. (1975): Root production and root turnover in a wet tundra ecosystem, Barrow, Alaska.—Ecology, Durham, 56: 401–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Simon T. etBatanouny K. H. (1971): Qualitative and quantitative studies on the root system ofFestucetum vaginatae.—Ann. Univ. Sci. Budapest, Sect. Biol., 13: 155–171.Google Scholar
  61. Simon T. etKovács-Láng E. (1976): Phytomass production and environmental conditions of graslands on sand soil at Csévharaszt [IBP experimental area in Hungary].—Pol. Ecol. Stud., 2: 121–127.Google Scholar
  62. Sims P. L. etSingh J. S. (1971): Herbage dynamics and net primary production in certain ungrazed and grazed grasslands in North America.—In:French N. R. [ed.] Preliminary analysis of structure and function in grasslands.—Range Sci. Dep. Sci., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Ser. No. 10: 59–124.Google Scholar
  63. Sims P. L. etSingh J. S. (1978): The structure and function of ten western North American grasslands. II. Infra-seasonal dynamics in primary producer compartments.—Journ. Ecol. Oxford, 66: 547–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sims P. L., Singh J. S. etLauenroth W. K. (1978): The structure and function of ten western North America grasslands. I. Abiotic and vegetational characteristic.—Journ. Ecol., Oxford, 66: 251–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Singh J. S. etColeman D. C. (1973): A technique for evaluating functional ro t biomass in grassland ecosystems.—Canad. J. Bot., Ottawa, 51: 1867–1870.Google Scholar
  66. Singh J. S. etColeman D. C. (1977): Evaluation of functional root biomass and translocation of photoassimilated11C in a short grass prairie ecosystem.—In:Marshall J. K. [ed.]: The belowground ecosystem: A synthesis of plant-associated processes, Range Sci. Dep. Sci. Ser. No. 26, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, p. 123–131.Google Scholar
  67. Slavoñovský F. (1968): Zpevňující význam podzemní hmoty dvou psammofilních společenstev. Část první.—Publ. Fac. Sci. Univ. J. E. Purkyně, Brno, 487: 439–468.Google Scholar
  68. Soukupová L. (1983): Vliv ekofáze na růst ostřicCarex gracilis Curt. aC. canescens L.—In:Jeník J. etKvět J. [eds.]: Studie zaplavovaných ekosystémů u Třeboně.—Studie ČSAV, 1983, 4: 39–43.Google Scholar
  69. Speidel B. (1976): Primary production and root activity of a Golden Oat meadow with different fertilizer treatments.—Pol. Ecol. Stud., 2: 77–89.Google Scholar
  70. Speidel B. etWeiss A. (1972): Zur ober- und unterirdischen Stoff-production einer Goldhafewiese bei verschiedener Düngung.—Angew. Bot., 46: 75–93.Google Scholar
  71. Speidel B. etWeiss A. (1974): Untersuchungen zur Wurzelaktivität unter einer Goldhaferwiese. —Angew. Bot., 48: 137–154.Google Scholar
  72. Tesařová M., Fiala K. etStudený V. (1982): Live and dead roots— their mass ratio in several grassland stands.—Folia Geobot. Phytotax., Praha, 17: 427–430.Google Scholar
  73. Titljanova A. A. etŠatochina N. G. (1974): Theoretical and experimental problems of biogeocenology. —In:Kovalev R. V. [ed.]: Reports of Siberian soil scientists for the 10th International congress of soil science, Novosibirsk, p. 91–113.Google Scholar
  74. Titljanova A. A. etTichomirova N. A. (1977): Biologičeskij krugovorot ugleroda v travjanych ekosistemach.—In: Problemy Sibirskogo Počvovedenia, Novosibirsk, p. 87–96.Google Scholar
  75. Titlyanova A., Rusch G. etMaarel Van der E. (1988): Biomass structure of limestone grasslands on Öland in relation to grazing intensity.—In:Sjögren E. [ed.]: Plant cover on the limestone Alvar of Öland, Ecology—Sociology—Taxonomy.—Acta Phytogeogr. Suec., 76: 125–134.Google Scholar
  76. Towpasz K. etSzymska M. (1983): Struktura i dynamika populacjiMilium effusum L. w lasach kolo Polanki-Haller na Pogorzu Wielickim [Poludnicwa Polska].—Zeszyty Naukowe Uniw. Jagiellońskiego, Prace Botaniczne, Kraków, 670: 109–142.Google Scholar
  77. Troughton A. (1957): The underground organs of herbage grasses.—Reading.Google Scholar
  78. Troughton A. (1970): The effects of mineral nutrition on the distribution of growth inLolium perenne.—Ann. Bot., London, 31: 447–454.Google Scholar
  79. Troughton A. (1970): Grass roots.—In: Welsh plant breeding station report for 1970, p. 87–99.Google Scholar
  80. Troughton A. (1977): Relationship between the root and shoot systems of grasses.—In:Marshall J. K. [ed.]: The belowground ecosystem: A synthesis of plant-associated processes. Range Sci. Dep. Sci. Ser. No. 26, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, p. 39–52.Google Scholar
  81. Troughton A. (1981): Length of life of grass roots.—Grass and Forage Sci., 36: 117–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Troughton A. (1983): Root ecology and plant growth.—In:Böhm W., Kutschera L. etLichtenegger E. [eds.]: Root ecology and its practical application, Int. Symposium Gumpenstein, 1982, Irdning, p. 447–452.Google Scholar
  83. Úlehlová B., Halva E. etVrána M. (1981): Vliv stupňované úrovně hnojení na rozložení kořenové hmoty v půdách některých travních porostů.—Rostl. Výr., Praha, 27: 1191–1198.Google Scholar
  84. Vagina T. A. (1962): Luga Baraby.—Novosibirsk.Google Scholar
  85. Vagina T. A. etŠatochina N. G. (1972): Features of phytomass accumulation in different types of herbaceous vegetation of the Barabinsk complex forest steppe.—In:Kuminova A. V. [ed.]: Geobotanical studies in Western and Middle Siberia, Novosibirsk, p. 163–190.Google Scholar
  86. Velich J. (1986): Studium vývoje produkčních schopností trvalých lučních porostů a drnového procesu při dlouhodobém hnojení a jeho optimalizace.—Praha.Google Scholar
  87. Velich J., Štráfelda J. etPrajzler J. (1974): Vliv dlouhodobého minerálního hnojení na množství a vertikální distribuci kořenové hmoty trvalých lučních porostů.—In: Sborn. VŠZ, Fak. Agron., Řada A, Praha, p. 81–89.Google Scholar
  88. Vesecký A. [red.] et al. (1958): Atlas podnebí Československé republiky.—Praha.Google Scholar
  89. Ward K. J., Klepper B., Rickman R. W. etAllmaras R. R. (1978): Quantitative estimating of living wheat-root lenght in soil cores.—Agron. J., 70: 675–677.Google Scholar
  90. Werger M. J. A. (1983): Wurzel/Spross-Verhältnis als Merkmal der Pflanzenstrategie.—In:Böhm W., Kutschera L. etLichtenegger E. [eds.]: Root ecology and its practical application Int. Symp. Gumpenstein, 1982, Irdning, p. 323–334.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karel Fiala
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Grassland EcosystemsInstitute of Systematical and Ecological Biology of the Czechoslovak Academy of SciencesBrnoCzechoslovakia

Personalised recommendations