Advertisement

Knowledge and Policy

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 67–76 | Cite as

Research evaluation: From power to empowerment

  • Fred Carden
Article
  • 54 Downloads

Abstract

This article explores issues in the evaluation of research through an examination of the situation in the field of international development. It is increasingly recognized that traditional evaluation, which served largely a policing function, is not useful in assessing the impact of the development research process. It is argued that the role and perception of evaluation must change if it is to provide a reflection of the learning which takes place in research. The field of international development research provides a rich ground in which to explore the argument. The field is subject to the difficulties of evaluating research and to the difficulties of evaluating development—in both cases, we are dealing with long time frames and the influence of many factors other than the activity itself. If evaluation is to serve a learning function, then the shift must be to a purpose ofempowerment. This article explores the changes which are implicit in such a shift through an examination of three key areas: changing perspectives on evaluation; changing patterns in development; and changing patterns in research for development.

Keywords

International Development Learning Tool Performance Measurement System Draft Report Traditional Evaluation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cassen, Robert (1986).Does Aid Work? Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  2. House, Ernest R. (1977). The Logic of Evaluative Argument.CSE Monograph Series in Evaluation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. International Assessment Team, IUCN (1996). Assessing Progress toward Sustainability. Draft report to IDRC.Google Scholar
  4. International Development Research Centre (1991).Empowerment through Knowledge. Ottowa: IDRC.Google Scholar
  5. Montigny, Philippe (1989). The Cassandra paradox relating to the effectiveness of evaluation and forecasting methods. InThe Scientific Evaluation of Research, D. Evered and S. Nharnett (eds). Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  6. Morgan, Gareth (ed.) (1983).Beyond Method. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Salewicz, S. and A. Dwivedi (1996).Global Project Leader Tracer Study. Ottawa: IDRC.Google Scholar
  8. Trist, Eric and Hugh Murray (eds.) (1990).The Social Engagement of Social Science: A Tavistock Anthology. Volume 1. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fred Carden
    • 1
  1. 1.the Evaluation Unit of the International Development Research CentreCanada

Personalised recommendations