Human Nature

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 231–246 | Cite as

Human conversational behavior

  • R. I. M. Dunbar
  • Anna Marriott
  • N. D. C. Duncan
Article

Abstract

Observational studies of human conversations in relaxed social settings suggest that these consist predominantly of exchanges of social information (mostly concerning personal relationships and experiences). Most of these exchanges involve information about the speaker or third parties, and very few involve critical comments or the soliciting or giving of advice. Although a policing function may still be important (e.g., for controlling social cheats), it seems that this does not often involve overt criticism of other individuals’ behavior. The few significant differences between the sexes in the proportion of conversation time devoted to particular topics are interpreted as reflecting females’ concerns with networking and males’ concerns with self-display in what amount to a conventional mating lek.

Key words

Conversational topics Humans Language evolution Reproductive strategies Sex differences 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aries, E. 1976 Interaction Patterns and Themes of Male, Female and Mixed Groups.Small Group Behaviour 7:7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beattie, G. 1983Talk: An Analysis of Speech and Non-Verbal Behaviour in Conversation. Milton Keynes, U.K.: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bischoping, K. 1993 Gender Differences in Conversation Topics, 1922–1990.Sex Roles 28:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brothers, L. 1989 The Social Brain: A Project for Integrating Primate Behaviour and Neurophysiology in a New Domain.Concepts in Neuroscience 1:27–51.Google Scholar
  5. Byrne, R. W. 1995The Thinking Primate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Byrne, R. W., and A. Whiten (eds.) 1988Machiavellian Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Coates, J. 1993Women, Men and Language, second ed. Harlow, U.K.: Longmans.Google Scholar
  8. 1994 No Gaps, Lots of Overlap: Turn-Taking Patterns in the Talk of Women Friends. InResearching Language and Literacy in Social Contexts, D. Graddol, J. Maybin, and B. Strier, eds. Pp. 177–192. London: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  9. 1996 One-At-A-Time: The Organisation of Men’s Talk. InDiscourses of Masculinity, S. Johnson and L. Meinhoff, eds. Pp. 107–129. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Coser, R. L. 1960 Laughter among Colleagues.Psychiatry 23:81–95.Google Scholar
  11. Cosmides, L. 1989 The Logic of Social Exchange: Has Natural Selection Shaped How Humans Reason? Studies with the Wason Selection Task.Cognition 31:187–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dunbar, R. I. M. 1988Primate Social Systems. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  13. 1992 Neocortex Size as a Constraint on Group Size in Primates.Journal of Human Evolution 20:469–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 1993 Coevolution of Neocortical Size, Group Size and Language in Humans.Behavioural and Brain Sciences 16:681–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunbar, R. I. M., and M. Spoors 1995 Social Networks, Support Cliques, and Kinship.Human Nature 6:273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dunbar, R. I. M., N. D. C. Duncan, and D. Nettle 1995 Size and Structure of Freely Forming Conversational Groups.Human Nature 6:67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eakins, B. W., and R. G. Eakins 1978Sex Differences in Human Communication. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  18. Emler, N. 1990 A Social Psychology of Reputation.European Review of Social Psychology 1:171–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 1992 The Truth about Gossip.Social Psychology Section Newsletter 27:23–37.Google Scholar
  20. 1994 Gossip, Reputation and Social Adaption. InGood Gossip, R. Goodman and A. Ben-Ze’ev, eds. Pp. 119–140. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
  21. Emler, N., and S. McNamara 1996 The Social Contact Patterns of Young People: Effects of Participation in the Social Institutions of Family, Education and Work. InYouth and Life Management: Research Perspectives, H. Helve and J. Bynner, eds. Pp. 121–139. Yliopistopaino: Helsinki University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Enquist, M., and O. Leimar 1993 The Evolution of Cooperation in Mobile Organisms.Animal Behaviour 45:747–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haviland, J. B. 1977Gossip, Reputation and Knowledge in Zinacantan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hawkes, K. 1991 Showing Off: Tests of an Hypothesis about Men’s Foraging Goals.Ethology and Sociobiology 12:29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kipers, P. 1987 Gender and Topic.Language and Society 16:543–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Landis, M. H., and H. E. Burtt 1924 A Study of Conversations.Journal of Comparative Psychology 4:81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McCormick, N. B., and J. W. McCormick 1992 Computer Friends and Foes: Content of Undergraduates’ Electronic Mail.Computers and Human Behaviour 8:379–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller, G. 1996 How Mate Choice Shaped Human Nature: A Review of Sexual Selection in Human Evolution. InHandbook of Evolutionary Psychology: Issues and Applications, C. Crawford and D. Krebs, eds. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum, in press.Google Scholar
  29. Milroy, L. 1980Language and Social Networks. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  30. 1987Observing and Analysing Natural Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  31. Moore, H. T. 1922 Further Data Concerning Sex Differences.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 4:81–89.Google Scholar
  32. Nelson, M. W. 1988 Women’s Ways: Interactive Patterns in Predominantly Female Research Teams. InWomen Communicating: Studies of Women’s Talk, B. Bate and A. Taylor, eds. Pp. 199–232. Northwood, New Jersey: Ablex.Google Scholar
  33. Provine, R. 1993 Laughter Punctuates Speech.Ethology 95:291–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smuts, B. B., D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, and T. T. Struhsaker (eds.) 1987Primate Societies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rolf 1969Biometry. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  36. Suls, J. M. 1977 Gossip as Social Comparison.Journal of Communication 27:164–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wood, M. M. 1966 The Influence of Sex and Knowledge of Communication Effectiveness on Spontaneous Speech.Word 22:117–137.Google Scholar
  38. Zimmerman, D., and C. West 1975 Sex Roles, Interruptions and Silences in Conversations. InLanguage and Sex: Differences and Dominance, B. Thorne and N. Henley, eds. Pp. 75–96. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. I. M. Dunbar
    • 1
  • Anna Marriott
    • 1
  • N. D. C. Duncan
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolEngland
  2. 2.University College LondonUK

Personalised recommendations