Skip to main content
Log in

Morphological features of F1 generation inRosa hybrids 1. Hybrids of some species of the sect.Caninae withRosa rugosa

  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present paper morphological features of hybrids from crossing of four species ofRosa sect.Caninae (R. canina L.,R. zalana Wiesb.,R. rubiginosa L. andR. sherardii Davies) withR. rugosa Thumbg. (sect.Cinnamomeae) and their heredity are described. F1 generation appears more or less uniform, certain morphological features are patroclinal, other ones are matroclinal and intermediary. The general appearance of these hybrids is intermediary; there seems to be no reason to consider them matroclinal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Blackburn, K. B. etHarrison, J. W. (1924): Genetical and cytological studies in the hybrid roses. I. The origin of a fertile hexaploid form in the Pimpinellifoliae-Vilosae crosses.—Brit. Journ. Exp. Biol., Edinburgh, 1: 557–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulenger, E. W. (1929): Sur les hybrides des roses de l'Europe Centrale et Occidentale.—Rev. Quest. Sci., Louvain et Bruxelles, 15: 251–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlanson, E. W. (1934): Experimental data for a revision of the North American wild roses.—Bot. Gaz., London. 96: 197–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erlanson-Mac Farlane, E. W. (1957): American rose species and their hybrids at the Botanical Garden of the University of Michigan.—Amer. Rose Ann., Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 42: 90–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlanson-Mac Farlane, E. W. (1961): Report of hybrids of American wild rose species at the Botanical Gardens of Michigan.—Amer. Rose Ann., Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 46: 107–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerlind, F. (1940): Sind die Canina-Rosen agamospermische Bastarden?—Svensk. Bot. Tidskr., Stockholm, 34: 334–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerlind, F. (1942): Kommt Agamospermie bei den Canina-Rosen vor?—Hereditas, Lund, 38: 224–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerlind, F. (1944a): Kompatibilität und Incompatibilität in der GattungRosa.—Acta Horti Berg., Stockholm, 13: 247–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerlind, F. (1944b): Die Zertationsverhältnisse beiRosa.—Svensk. Bot. Tidskr., Stockholm, 38: 226–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerlind, F. (1945a): Induzierte Verdoppelung der Chromosomenzahl in der GattungRosa.—Acta Horti Berg., Stockholm, 14: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerlind, F. (1945b): Die Bastarde der Canina-Rosen, ihre Syndese und Formbildungsverhältnisse.—Acta Horti Berg., Stockholm, 14: 7–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerlind, F. (1946): Pollenkonkurenz und Bastardierungsschwierigkeiten in der GattungRosa.—Svensk. Bot. Tidskr., Stockholm, 40: 284–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerlind, F. (1948): Compatibility, eu- and pseudo-incompatibility in the genusRosa.—Acta Horti Berg., Stockholm, 15: 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerlind, F. (1951): Influence of the pollen giver on the production of hips, achenes and seeds in the Canina Roses.—Acta Horti Berg., Stockholm, 16: 121–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, A. (1931): Weitere Kastrierungsversuche in der GattungRosa.—Bot. Notiser, Lund, 350–354.

  • Gustafsson, A. (1942): Cross-experiments in the genusRosa.—Hereditas, Lund, 28: 235–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J. W. H. (1954–1955): Durham wild roses.—Proc. Bot. Soc. Brit. Isl., New Castle 3: 369–371 et 373–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jičínská, D. (1976): Autogamy of various species of the genusRose.—Preslia, Praha, 48] XX-XX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, W. H. (1970): Species roses in the United States. Their relationship to the modern roses.—Miss. Bot. Gard. Bull., St. Louis, Missouri, 58/4: 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratsek, J. C. etYarnell, S. H. etFlory, W. S. (1939): Crossing relations of some diploid species of roses.—Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., Geneva et New York, 37: 983–992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratsek, J. C., Yarnell, S. H. etFlory, W. S. (1941): Crossing relations of some diploid and polyploid species of roses.—Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., Geneva et New York, 38: 637–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Täckholm, G. (1920): On the cytology of the genusRosa.—Svensk. Bot. Tidskr., Stockholm, 14: 300–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Täckholm, G. (1922): Zytologische Studien über die GattungRosa.—Acta Horti Berg., Stockholm, 7: 97–381.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jičínská, D. Morphological features of F1 generation inRosa hybrids 1. Hybrids of some species of the sect.Caninae withRosa rugosa . Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 11, 301–311 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02909477

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02909477

Keywords

Navigation