Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A newly adoptet restriction of illegitimity in generic names and its consequences forAvenochloa Holub 1962

  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  • Briquet, J. (1906): International rules of botanical nomenclature chifley of Vascular plants.— Verh. Intern. Bot. Kongress. Wien 1905, p. 197–213.—Jena.

  • Briquet, J. et al. (1935): International rules of botanical nomenclature. Ed. 3—Jena.

  • Donk, M. A. (1963): On superfluous names.—Taxon, Utrecht, 12: 319–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumortier, B. (1868): Étude agrostographique sur le genreMichelaria et la classification des Graminées.—Bull. Soc. Bot. Belg., Bruxelles, 7: 42–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrendorfer, F. [ed.] (1973): Liste der Gefäßpflanzen Mitteleuropas. Ed. 2.—Stuttgart.

  • Ehrendorfer, F., et al. (1967): Liste der Gefäßpflanzen Mitteleuropas.—Graz.

  • Fosberg, F. R. (1959):Serianthes dilwyi nomen novum.—Taxon, Utrecht, 8: 65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furtado, C. X. (1960): Superfluous names and later homonyms.—Taxon, Utrecht, 9: 147–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gervais, C. (1973): Contribution a l'étude cytologique et taxonomique des avoines vivaces.— Denkschr. Schweiz. Naturf. Ges., Zürich, 88.

  • Greuter, W. (1973): Additions to the flora of Crete, 1938–1972.—Ann. Mus. Goulandris, Kifisia, 1: 15–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greuter, W. (1974): Proposals by Werner Greuter (Kifisia).—Taxon, Utrecht, 23: 869–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holub, J. (1958): Bemerkungen zur Taxonomie der GattungHelictotrichon Bess.—In:Klášterský, I, et al.: Philipp Maxmilian Opiz und seine Bedeutung für Pflanzentaxonomie, p. 101–133.—Praha.

  • Holub, J. (1962): Ein Beitrag zur Abgrenzung der Gattungen in der TribusAveneae: die GattungAvenochloa Holub.—Acta Horti Bot. Pragensis, Praha, 1962: 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holub, J. (1970): New names in Phanerogamae 1.—Folia Geobot. Phytotax., Praha, 5: 435–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holub, J. (1970): Neue oder wenig bekannte Pflanzen der ungarischen Flora.—Annal. Univ. Sci. Budapest., Sect. Biol., 14: 91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holub, J., Měsíček, J. etJavůrková, V. (1971): Annotated chromosome counts of Czechoslovak plants (16–30).—Folia Geobot. Phytotax., Praha, 6: 179–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holub, J. etPouzar, Z. (1967): A nomenclatural analysis of the generic names of Phanerogams proposed by F. M. Opiz in his Seznam rostlin květeny české.—Folia Geobot. Phytotax., Praha, 2: 397–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M. (1969): Necessary words on superfluous names.—Regnum Vegetab., Utrecht, 60: 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laínz, M. (1974): Aportaciones al conocimiento de la Flora Gallega, VIII.—Comunic. I.N.I.A., Ser. Recurs. Natur., Madrid, 1974/2.

  • Lanjouw, J. (1950): Synopsis of proposals on botanical nomenclature Stockholm 1950.—Utrecht.

  • Lanjouw, J. (1959): Synopsis of proposals.—Regnum Vegetab., Utrecht, 14.

  • Lanjouw, J. et al. (1961): International code of botanical nomenclature.—Regnum Vegetab., Utrecht, 23.

  • Lanjouw, J. et al. (1966): International code of botanical nomenclature—Regnum Vegetab., Utrecht, 46.

  • Pospichal, E. (1897): Flora des oesterreichischen Küstenlandes. Vol. I.—Leipzig et Wien.

  • Ross, R. (1958): Superfluous names.—Taxon, Utrecht, 7: 264–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, J. E. et al. (1947): Index Kewensis plantarum Phanerogamarum. Supplementum decimum.—Oxonii.

  • Scholz, H. (1974): Liste der Gräser Lybiens.—Willdenowia, Berlin, 7: 419–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, A. C. (1969): Arguments and proposals.—Regnum Vegetab., Utrecht, 60: 96–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, R. (1969): Considerations and proposals.—Regnum Vegetab., Utrecht, 60: 97–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soó, R. (1974): Systematisch-nomenklatorische Bemerkungen zur Flora Mitteleuropas mit Beziehungen zur südosteuropäischen Flora. Nachträge und Verbesserungen.—Feddes Repert., Berlin, 85: 433–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafleu, F. A. (1966): Tenth international botanical congress Edinburgh 1964. Nomenclature section.—Regnum Vegetab., Utrecht, 44.

  • Stafleu, F. A. etVoss, E. G. (1969): Synopsis of proposals on botanical nomenclature Seattle 1969—Regnum Vegetab., Utrecht, 60.

  • Stafleu, F. A. etVoss, E. G. (1972): Report on botanical nomenclature Seattle 1969.—Regnum Vegetab., Utrecht, 81.

  • Stafleu, F. A. etVoss, E. G. (1975): Synopsis of proposals on botanical nomenclature Leningrad 1975.—Taxon, Utrecht, 24: 201–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stafleu, F. A. et al. (1972): International code of botanical nomenclature.—Regnum Vegetab., Utrecht, 82.

  • Tryon, R. (1962): A commentary on superfluous names.—Taxon, Utrecht, 11: 116–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weresub, L. K. etHennebert, G. L. (1963): Article 63 (Montreal Code) and the type method.— Taxon, Utrecht, 12: 218–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Holub J.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holub, J. A newly adoptet restriction of illegitimity in generic names and its consequences forAvenochloa Holub 1962. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 11, 282–300 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02909476

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02909476

Keywords

Search

Navigation