Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quality assurance of nuclear medicine instrumentation

  • Editorials
  • Published:
Ricerca in clinica e in laboratorio

Summary

In conclusion, the minimum requirements23 (after instrument acceptance or initial testing) for a satisfactory quality control program for each data acquisition system in nuclear medicine are: a. quality control tests should be performed routinely and should take no more than 15 min; b. protocols for each counting instrument and imaging system should be defined for the routine tests described in this paper. Test procedures may be adopted from the literature; c. the resulting data (numerical data and images) should be carefully scrutinized, compared with information (reference data) obtained initially under similar conditions, and used to decide whether to proceed with clinical studies (see scheme 1); d. all test images should be properly labeled and retained for immediate reference, preferably in the form of a logbook; e. a review of these data should be made on a weekly basis to detect long-term deterioration. A review image recording and its quality control is included in theAppendix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adams R., Hine G. J., Zimmerman C. D.: Deadtime measurements in scintillation cameras under scatter conditions simulating quantitative nuclear cardiography — J. nucl. Med.19, 538, 1978.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. American Association of Physicists in Medicine: Scintillation camera acceptance testing and performance evaluation — Draft Report, Nuclear Medicine Committee, 1979; AAPM 1980. (In press).

  3. American National Standards Institute: Calibration and usage of dose calibrator ionization chambers for the assay of radionuclides — ANSI-SHO7484, 1978.

  4. Hare D. L., Hendee W. R., Whitney W. P., Chaney E. L.: Accuracy of well ionization chamber isotope calibrators — J. nucl. Med.15, 1138, 1974.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hayes M., MacIntyre W. J.: Techniques of evaluation of nuclear medicine instrumentation — In: Critical reviews in clinical radiology and nuclear medicine. The Chemical Rubber Co., Cleveland, USA6, 31, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hermann G. A., Herrera N. E., Hauser W., Oxley D. K.: Rationale techniques and results of a quality control programme of imaging procedures — In: Medical radionuclide imaging. Proceedings of IAEA Symp., Los Angeles, USA, 1976. IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 1977; vol. 1, p. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hine G. J., Paras P., Warr C. P., Adams R.: Measurements of the performance parameters of gamma cameras: part II — HEW Publ. (FDA) 79-8049, Rockville, USA, 1979.

  8. Hospital Physicists Association: The theory, specifications, and testing of Anger-type gamma cameras — Topic Group Report 27, HPA 1978.

  9. IAEA: Quality control schedules for nuclear medicine instrumentation — Draft Report, revised March 1981.

  10. International Electrotechnical Commission: Characteristics and test conditions of radionuclide imaging devices — Draft Report of Subcommittee62c, 78/32345, 1978.

  11. Keyes J. W. Jr.,Carey J., Moses D., Beierwaltes W.: Quality assurance procedures. In:Keyes J. W. (Ed.): Manual of nuclear medicine procedures. 3rd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, 1978;

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kowalski R., Johnston E. R., Khan F. H.: Dose calibrator performance and quality control — J. nucl. Med. Technol.5, 35, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  13. McIntyre A. B., Paras P., Grant R. C.: Nuclear medicine in the United States — J. nucl. Med.21, 42, 1980. (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  14. MacIntyre W. J., Flynn M. J., Wegst A. V.: Quality assurance testing of rectilinear scanners. In:Rhodes B. A. (Ed.): Quality control in nuclear medicine. C. V. Mosby, Co., St. Louis, USA, 1977; chapter 37.

    Google Scholar 

  15. MacIntyre W. J., Rhodes B. A.: Quality assurance objectives for nuclear medicine instrumentation. In:Rhodes B. A. (Ed.): Quality control in nuclear medicine. C.V. Mosby, Co., St. Louis, USA, 1977; chapter 35.

    Google Scholar 

  16. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements: A handbook of radioactivity measurements procedures — NCRP Report no. 58, section 6.4.3.2.3, 1978; p. 258.

  17. National Electrical Manufacturers Association: Performance measurement standard for scintillation cameras — NEMA, 1980.

  18. Nuclear Regulatory Commission: A guide for preparation of applications for medical programs — NRC NUREG-0338, 1977.

  19. Paras P.: Quality assurance in nuclear medicine — In: Medical radionuclide imaging. Proceedings of IAEA Symp., Los Angeles, 1976. IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 1977; vol. 1, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Paras P., Hine G. J., Adams R.: BRH test pattern for the evaluation of gamma-camera performance — J. nucl. Med.22, 468, 1981.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Paras P., Van Tuinen R., Hamilton D.: Quality control for scintillation cameras. In:Rhodes B. A. (Ed.): Quality control in nuclear medicine. C.V. Mosby, Co., St. Louis, USA, 1977; chapter 38.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Payne J. T., Loken M. K., Ponto R. A.: Comparison of dose calibrators for radioactive assay — J. nucl. Med.15, 522, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Quality Control for Scintillation Cameras — Bureau of Radiological Health, Washington, D.C., USA, HEW/FDA 76-8046, 1976.

  24. Rollo F. D.: Quality assurance in nuclear medicine. In:Rollo F. D. (Ed.): Nuclear medicine physics, instrumentation and agents. C. V. Mosby, Co., St. Louis, USA, 1977; chapter 8.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rollo F. D.: Evaluating imaging devices. In:Rollo F. D. (Ed.): Nuclear medicine physics, instrumentation and agents. C. V. Mosby, Co., St. Louis, USA, 1977; chapter 11, p. 436.

    Google Scholar 

  26. WHO: Quality assurance in nuclear medicine — Draft Report (Proceedings, Heidelberg, November 1980), revised March 1981.

  27. Workshop Manual for Quality Control of Scintillation Cameras in Nuclear Medicine — Bureau of Radiological Health, Washington, D.C., USA, HEW/FDA 76-8039, 1976.

  28. Workshop Manual for Quality Control of Rectilinear Scanners — (Draft), Bureau of Radiological Health, Washington, D.C., USA, 1977.

  29. Workshop Manual forin vitro Procedures — (Draft), Bureau of Radiological Health, Washington, D.C., USA, 1978.

  30. Workshop Manual for Radiopharmaceutical Quality Control and Radionuclide Handling — Bureau of Radiological Health, Washington, D.C., USA. (In preparation).

References

  1. ANSI (American National Standards Institute): Guide for quality control — ANSI (R 1969), 21.1-1958.

  2. ANSI (American National Standards Institute): Methods for the sensitometry of medical and dental X-ray films — ANSI PH-2.9, 1974.

  3. Debelder M., Bollen R., Van Esch R.: A new evaluation of radiographic systems. In:Weaver K., Wagner R. F., Goodnenough D. J. (Eds): Medical X-ray photo-optical systems evaluations. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, 1975; vol. 56, p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dobrin R., Kricheff I., Fite W., Weather R.: The effect of variability of automatic film processing systems on the quality of radiographs — Radiology113, 545, 1974.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldman L., Vucich J. J., Beech R. T., Murphy W. L.: Automatic processing quality assurance program: impact on a radiology department — Radiology125, 591, 1977.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gray J. E., Haus A. G.: Protocol for basic photographic processor quality control — Appl. Radiol.6, 115, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grossman L. W., Van Tuinen R. J., Kruger J. B., Scholz K. L.: Film reciprocity law failure in scintillation camera imaging — Radiology138, 3, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  8. James T. (Ed.): The theory of the photographic process — 4th ed. MacMillan and Company, New York, 1977;

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kondrat M., Geissinger J.: Display monitor section: it’s not as simple as you think — Electron. Design26, 118, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  10. McKinney W. E. J.: Artifact film interpretation. In:Haus A. G. (Ed.): The physics of medical imaging. AAPM, 1979.

  11. McKinney W. E. J.: Radiographic processing: processing and chemistry. In:Haus A. G. (Ed.): The physics of medical imaging. AAPM, 1979; p. 16.

  12. Park H. M., Oppenheim B. E., Burt R. W., Siddiqui A. R., Wellman H. N., Appledorn C. R., Lewis S.: The efficacy of high contrast film copying for Tl-201 myocardial image processing — J. nucl. Med.21, 92, 1980. (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Photographic media for image displays — In: Workshop Manual for quality control of scintillation cameras in nuclear medicine. Bureau of Radiological Health, Washington, D.C., USA, HEW/FDA 76-8039, 1976.

  14. Schwenker R. P.: Film performance in analog nuclear medicine imaging. In:Haus A. G. (Ed.): The physics of medical imaging. AAPM, 1979; p. 409.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. US Department of Health and Human Services, Bureau of Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 20857, Rockville, Md, USA

    Peter Paras

Authors
  1. Peter Paras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paras, P. Quality assurance of nuclear medicine instrumentation. La Ricerca Clin. Lab. 11, 357–377 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02909035

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02909035

Key-words

Search

Navigation