Abstract
When stem cuttings were put in water the dormancy of the bud was broken. No inhibitory substances could be found in the leaves and no effect of exogenous growth substances could be detected. Dormancy of buds in the present case seems to be the result of the mechanical resistance imposed by the leaf sheath upon the bud.
Gibberellic acid was very effective in promoting root formation in the woody stem cutting ofPanicum maximum and the present results point to a direct effect on root initiation by gibberellic acid.
References
Abeles, F. B.: Ethylene in Plant Biology. - Academic Press, London 1973.
Anand, V. K., Chibbar, E. N., Nanda, K. K.: Effects of GA3 and IBA on rooting and on the sprouting of buds on stem cuttings ofIpomoea fistulosa. - Plant Cell Physiol.13: 917 to 921, 1972.
Brian, P. W., Hemmings, H. G., Lowe, D.: Inhibition of rooting of cuttings by gibberellic acid. -Ann. Bot.24: 407–419, 1960.
Darrow, G. M.: Rest period requirements for blueberries. - Proc. amer. Soc. hort. Sci.41: 189 to 194, 1942.
Felippe, G. M.: Effects of photoperiod on flowering ofPanicum maximum. - Hoehnea7:11 to 16, 1978.
Felippe, G. M.: The flowering of tillers ofPanicum maximum. - Revista bras. Bot.2 (in press), 1979.
Joly, C. A., Felippe, G. M.: Dormência das sementes deRapanea guianensis Aubl. - Revista bras. Bot.2: 1–6, 1979.
Nanda, K. K., Anand, V. K., Chibbar, R. N.: The promotive effect of gibberellic acid on the promotion of adventitious roots on stem cuttings ofIpomoea fistulosa. - Planta105: 360 to 363, 1972.
Pollock, B. M.: Studies of rest period. - Plant Physiol.35: 975–977, 1960.
Vegis, A.: Dormancy in higher plants. - Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol.15: 185–224, 1964.
Villiers, T. A.: Dormancy and the Survival of Plants. - Edward Arnold, London 1975.
Wareing, P. F.: A new photoperiodic phenomenon in short day plants. - Nature181: 614, 1953.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Felippe, G.M. Bud breaking and adventitious root formation inPanicum maximum Jacq. Biol Plant 22, 392–395 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908992
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908992