Abstract
It is generally assumed that the sustained extraction and processing of non-timber forest products by local people can enhance their cash income and provide an alternative to tropical deforestation. However, the degree to which such products actually or may potentially contribute to rural incomes is poorly documented. We present the results of a study that seeks to evaluate the reliance of an indigenous group on non-timber forest products for cash income. Furthermore, we examine the effect of household variables on the cash income derived from collection and the price appreciation of non-timber forest products. These products account for nearly half of the gross annual income earned by the Soliga households in the Biligiri Rangan Hills of the Karnataka State in South India. Econometric models indicate that although income derived from the extraction of non-timber forest products is high in proportion to the time devoted to the collection, the extraction is not a preferred vocation. Furthermore, price appreciation for non-timber forest products varies for different products and, overall, the Soligas obtain essentially minimal wages for their extractive efforts. We discuss possible mechanisms for enhancement of Soligas’ income and the involvement of Soligas in conservation efforts.
Resumen
E’de conhecimento geral que a extraçao sustentável de produtos florestais pode aumentar a renda do povo rural e oferecer uma alternativa ao problema de desmatamento nos paises tropicais. No entanto, o grau, no qual tais produtos contribuem na renda rural, tern sido pobremente documentado. Nós apresentamos neste trabalho resultados sobre a dependéncia financeira de um grupo indigena em produtos florestais nao madereiros. Nós examinamos o efeito de variáveis domésticas na renda monetária derivada da extraçao e tambem a apreciagao de precos dos produtos florestais não madereiros. Estes podutos representam aproximadamente medade da renda anual bruta ganha por casa da tribo Soliga (Biligiri Rangan Hills, Estado de Karnataka—India). Modelos econométricos indicant que embora a renda derivada do extrativismo de produtos não madereiros seja aha em proporgao ao tempo gasto na coleta, este não e o trabalho preferido pelos Soligas. A aprecciação de pregos varia entre os diferentes produtos extraidos. Os Soligas obtém salärio minimo pela extração destes produtos. Nós discutimos mecanismos possiveis para aumentar a renda dos Soligas e o envolvimento dos mesmos em trabalhos de conservação da mata.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Literature Cited
Chakravarthy, L, and R. Verma. 1991. Marketing of a minor forest produce in a tribal sub plan area through co-operatives in Rajasthan. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics 71:311–320.
CSIR (Council of Scientific and Industrial Research). 1986. The useful plants of India. Publications and Information Directorate, CSIR, Hillside Road, New Delhi 110012.
Fernandes, W., G. Menon, and P. Viegas. 1988. Forests, environment and tribal economy. Indian Social Institute, New Delhi.
Godoy, R., and K. S. Bawa. 1993. The economic value and sustainable harvest of plants and animals from the tropical rain forest: Assumptions, hypotheses, and methods. Economic Botany 47:215–219.
Gujarathi, D. 1978. Basic econometrics. McGraw Hill Book Company, New York.
Malhotra, K. C, D. Deb, M. Dutta, T. S. Vasulu, G. Yadav, and M. Adhikari. 1991. Role of nontimber forest produce in village economy: A household survey in Jamboni Range, Midnapore District, West Bengal. Unpublished paper, Indian Institute of Biosocial Research and Development.
Murali, K. S., Uma Shankar, R. Uma Shaanker, K. N. Ganeshaiah, and K. S. Bawa. 1996. Extraction of non-timber forest products in the forests of Biligiri Rangan Hills, India. 2. Impact of NTFP extraction on regeneration, population structure, and species composition. Economic Botany 50:252–269.
Nepstad, D. C., I. F. Brown, L. Luz, A. Alechandra, and V. Viana. 1992. Biotic impoverishment of Amazonian forests by tappers, loggers and cattle ranchers. Pages 1–14 in D. C. Nepstad and S. Schwartzman, eds., Non-timber products from tropical forests: evaluation of a conservation and development strategy. Advances in Economic Botany 9. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY.
Panayotou, T., and P. Ashton. 1992. Not by timber alone: The case for multiple use management of tropical forests. Island Press, Covelo, CA.
Ramesh, B. R. 1989. Vegetation map of the Biligiri Rangan Hills. French Institute, Pondicherry.
Uma Shankar, K. S. Murali, R. Uma Shaanker, K. N. Ganeshaiah, and K. S. Bawa. 1996. Extraction of non-timber forest products in the forests of Biligiri Rangan Hills, India. 3. Productivity, extraction and prospects of sustainable harvest of AmlaPhyllanthus emblica, (Euphorbiaceae). Economic Botany 50:270–279.
Shiva, M. P. 1993. Solutions to overcome impediments in forest development through MFP based management. Paper presented at the International seminar on Minor Forest Products in Forestry, 17–18th April, Dehra Dun.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hegde, R., Suryaprakash, S., Achoth, L. et al. Extraction of non-timber forest products in the forests of Biligiri Rangan Hills, India. 1. Contribution to rural income. Econ Bot 50, 243–251 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02907328
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02907328