Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Consistency conditions for the\({\mathcal{N}}\overline {\mathcal{N}} \to \pi \pi \) helicity amplitudeshelicity amplitudes

  • Published:
Lettere al Nuovo Cimento (1971-1985)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. G. Höhler, R. Strauss andH. Wunder: Karlsruhe preprint (1968) (referred to as HSW).

  2. H. Nielsen andG. C. Oades:Nucl. Phys.,49 B, 586 (1972) (referred to as NO).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Nielsen, J. L. Petersen andE. Pietarinen:Nucl. Phys.,22 B, 525 (1970) (referred to as NPP).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. H. B. Geddes andR. H. Graham: Toronto University preprint (1972).

  5. D. Amati, E. Leader andB. Vitale:Phys. Rev.,130, 750 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Chemtob, J. W. Durso andD. O. Riska:Nucl. Phys.,38 B, 232 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. N. Epstein andB. H. J. McKellar:Bull. Am. Phys. Soc.,16, 1150 (1971);Lett. Nuovo Cimento,5, 807 (1972), and to be published.

    Google Scholar 

  8. We use units such thath=c=m π =1.

  9. W. R. Frazer andJ. R. Fulco:Phys. Rev.,117, 1603 (1960).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. We use\(\Gamma _2 \) instead off 22 because\(\Gamma _2 \) enters directly in the calculation of the nucleon-nucleon interaction.

  11. J. Engels:Nucl. Phys.,36 B, 73 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. G. Höhler andR. Strauss:Zeits. Phys.,232, 205 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. H. Nielsen:Nucl. Phys.,33 B, 152 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. G. F. Chew, M. L. Goldberger, F. E. Low andY. Nambu:Phys. Rev.,106, 1337 (1957).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. However our value of Imf +0 does agree with their value within the stated errors, so we may expect the NO amplitude to satisfy our condition.

  16. S. M. Flatté, M. Alston-Garnjost, A. Barraro-Galtieri, J. H. Friedman, G. R. Lynch, S. D. Protopopescu, M. S. Rabin andF. T. Solmitz:Phys. Lett.,38 B, 232 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Hamilton, P. Menotti, G. C. Oades andL. L. J. Vick:Phys. Rev.,128, 1881 (1962).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Furuichi andK. Watanabe:Progr. Theor. Phys. (Kyoto),37, 465 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. D. Morgan andG. Shaw:Phys. Rev. D,2, 520 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. The error estimate is based on experimental uncertainties in determinations of the pion electromagnetic form factor.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic.

    G. N. Epstein & B. H. J. McKellar

Authors
  1. G. N. Epstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. H. J. McKellar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Epstein, G.N., McKellar, B.H.J. Consistency conditions for the\({\mathcal{N}}\overline {\mathcal{N}} \to \pi \pi \) helicity amplitudeshelicity amplitudes. Lett. Nuovo Cimento 8, 177–181 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02906228

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02906228

Search

Navigation