Skip to main content

Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design

Abstract

The ARCS Model of motivation was developed in response to a desire to find more effective ways of understanding the major influences on the motivation to learn, and for systematic ways of identifying and solving problems with learning motivation. The resulting model contains a four category synthesis of variables that encompasses most of the areas of research on human motivation, and a motivational design process that is compatible with typical instructional design models. Following its development, the ARCS Model was field tested in two inservice teacher education programs. Based on the results of these field tests, the ARCS Model appears to provide useful assistance to designers and teachers, and warrants more controlled studies of its critical attributes and areas of effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psycological Review, 84, 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., & Schunk, D.H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. E. (1965). Motivational problems raised by exploratory and epistemic behavior. In S. Koch (Ed.),Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 5). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. (1983). Conceptualizing student motivation.Educational Psychologist, 18, 200–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. A. (1977).Self-fulfilling prophecies: Social psychological and physiological effects of expectancies. New York: Halsted Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J. M. (1979). Motivation and instructional design: A theoretical perspective.Journal of Instructional Development, 2(4), 26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J.M. (1984). The use of the ARCS model of motivation in teacher training. In K.E. Shaw (Ed.),Aspects of educational technology volume XVII: Staff development and career updating. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J.M. (1987). Motivational design. InEncyclopaedia of Educational Media, Communications, and Technology, 2nd Edition. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J. M., & Kopp, T. (1987). Application of the ARCS model of motivational design. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional theories in action: Lessons illustrating selected theories and models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J.M., & Suzuki, K. (1987). Use of the ARCS motivation model in courseware design. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.),Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware. Lawrence Erlbaum, Publisher.

  • Krathwohl, D.R., Bloom, B.S., & Masia, B.B. (1964).Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals, handbook II: Affective domain. New York: David McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepper, M.R., & Greene, D. (1979).The hidden costs of reward. Morristown, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1938).The conceptual representation and measurement of psychological forces. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mager, R.F. (1968).Developing attitude toward learning. Belmont, CA: Fearon Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D.C. (1965). Toward a theory of motive acquisition.American Psychologist, 20, 321–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCombs, B. L. (1984). Processes and skills underlying continuing intrinsic motivation to learn: Toward a definition of motivational skills training.Educational Psychologist, 4, 190–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, M.C., & Newby, T.J. (1986) Metacognition: Relevance to instructional design.Journal of Instructional Development, 9(4), 29–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B.F. (1961). Teaching machines,cientific American, 205, 90–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steers, R.M., & Porter, L.W. (1987).Motivation and work behavior. (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, E.C. (1932).Purposive behavior in animals and men. New York: Century.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (Ed.) (1974).Achievement motivation attribution theory. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, B.J. (1971).Statistical principles in experimental design. (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wlodkowski, R.J. (1978).Motivation and teaching: A practical guide. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wlodkowski, R. J. (1985).Enhancing adult motivation to learn. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (1971). Dimensions of sensation seeking.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 36, 45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keller, J.M. Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development 10, 2 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905780

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905780

Keywords

  • Instructional Design
  • Instructional Material
  • Instructional Development
  • Motivational Strategy
  • Motivational Problem