Skip to main content
Log in

The elaboration theory’s procedure for designing instruction

A conceptual approach

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of instructional development

Abstract

This paper describes the use of elaboration theory in selecting, sequencing, synthesizing, and summarizing instructional content that is predominantly conceptual in nature. A brief summary of the elaboration theory is provided, as well as a description of the major works that the elaboration theory has incorporated or built upon. A nine-step procedure is presented which can be used by designers and teachers working together as a team. The procedure involves (1) deciding when to use a conceptual approach, (2) selecting the concepts to be taught and organizing them into knowledge structures, (3) deciding what is the most inclusive of those knowledge structures, (4) arranging that knowledge structure’s concepts in a general-to-detailed sequence that will provide the “skeleton” or basic structure of the course, (5) identifying other ideas and facts that should also be taught (including learning prerequisites) and adding “flesh” to the skeleton of the course by allocating each such idea and fact to its most highly related “skeletal” concept, (6) allocating all content to lessons, (7) sequencing the content within each lesson, (8) designing the test items and instruction on each individual piece of content (i.e., on each concept, principle, procedure, and fact), and (9) creating synthesis test items and instructional components. Prescriptions for developing instruction on a single piece of content (step 8 above) are based on Merrill’s component display theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ausubel, D.P.Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B.S. (Ed.).Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J.S.The process of education. New York: Vintage Books, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J.S.Toward a theory of instruction. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagne, R.M. Learning Hierarchies.Educational Psychologist, 1968,6, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagne, R.M.The conditions of learning. 3rd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J.M. Motivation and instructional design: A theoretical perspective.Journal of Instructional Development, 1979,2, (4), 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J.M. Motivational design of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status, in press.

  • Merrill, M.D. The component display theory. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status, in press.

  • Merrill, M.D., Reigeluth, C.M., & Faust, G.W. The instructional quality profile: A curriculum evaluation and design tool. In H.F. O’Neil, Jr. (Ed.),Procedures for instructional systems development. New York: Academic Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M.D., Richards, R.E., Schmidt, R.V., & Wood, N.D.The instructional strategy diagnostic profile training manual. San Diego: Courseware, Inc., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M.D., & Wood, N.D.Rules for effective instructional strategies. Instructional Design Series. Orem, Utah: Courseware, Inc., 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, P.F. Hierarchical and information processing task analysis: A comparison.Journal of Instructional Development, 1978,1(2), 35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, P.F. Analysis of a procedural task.NSPI Journal, February 1980,19(1), 11–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D.A.Cognitive organization and learning. (Report No. 37). San Diego: Center for Human Information Processing, University of California, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C.M. (Ed.),Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status, in press.

  • Reigeluth, C.M., Merrill, M.D., & Bunderson, C.V. The structure of subject matter content and its instructional design implications.Instructional Science, 1978,7, 107–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C.M., Merrill, M.D., Wilson, B.G., & Spiller, R.T. The elaboration theory of instruction: A model for sequencing and synthesizing instruction.Instructional Science, 1980,9, 195–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C.M., & Rodgers, C.A. The elaboration theory of instruction: Prescriptions for task analysis and design.NSPI Journal. 1980,19, 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C.M., & Sari, I.F. From better tests to better texts: Instructional design models for writing better textbooks.NSPI Journal, October 1980,19 (8), 4–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C.M., & Stein, F.S The elaboration theory of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status, in press.

  • Resnick, L. Issues in the study of learning hiererachies. In L.R. Resnick (Ed.), Hierarchies in children’s learning: A symposium.Instructional Science, 1973,2, 312–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigney, J.W. Learning strategies: A theoretical perspective. In H.F. O’Neil, Jr. (Ed.),Learning strategies. New York: Academic Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sari, I.F., & Reigeluth, C.M. Writing and evaluating textbooks: Contributions from instructional theory. In D. Jonassen (Ed.),Technology of text: Principles for structuring, designing, and displaying text. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications, in press.

  • Scandura, J.M.Structural learning I: Theory and research. London: Gordon & Breach Science Publishers, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scandura, J.M. Instructional strategies based on the structural learning theory. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status, in press.

  • Twelker, P.A., Urbach, F.D., & Buck, J.E.The systematic development of instruction: An overview and basic guide to the literature. Stanford, CA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Media and Technology, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reigeluth, C.M., Darwazeh, A. The elaboration theory’s procedure for designing instruction. Journal of Instructional Development 5, 22–32 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905492

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905492

Keywords

Navigation