Abstract
This paper describes the use of elaboration theory in selecting, sequencing, synthesizing, and summarizing instructional content that is predominantly conceptual in nature. A brief summary of the elaboration theory is provided, as well as a description of the major works that the elaboration theory has incorporated or built upon. A nine-step procedure is presented which can be used by designers and teachers working together as a team. The procedure involves (1) deciding when to use a conceptual approach, (2) selecting the concepts to be taught and organizing them into knowledge structures, (3) deciding what is the most inclusive of those knowledge structures, (4) arranging that knowledge structure’s concepts in a general-to-detailed sequence that will provide the “skeleton” or basic structure of the course, (5) identifying other ideas and facts that should also be taught (including learning prerequisites) and adding “flesh” to the skeleton of the course by allocating each such idea and fact to its most highly related “skeletal” concept, (6) allocating all content to lessons, (7) sequencing the content within each lesson, (8) designing the test items and instruction on each individual piece of content (i.e., on each concept, principle, procedure, and fact), and (9) creating synthesis test items and instructional components. Prescriptions for developing instruction on a single piece of content (step 8 above) are based on Merrill’s component display theory.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ausubel, D.P.Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1968.
Bloom, B.S. (Ed.).Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay, 1956.
Bruner, J.S.The process of education. New York: Vintage Books, 1960.
Bruner, J.S.Toward a theory of instruction. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1966.
Gagne, R.M. Learning Hierarchies.Educational Psychologist, 1968,6, 1–9.
Gagne, R.M.The conditions of learning. 3rd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1977.
Keller, J.M. Motivation and instructional design: A theoretical perspective.Journal of Instructional Development, 1979,2, (4), 26–32.
Keller, J.M. Motivational design of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status, in press.
Merrill, M.D. The component display theory. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status, in press.
Merrill, M.D., Reigeluth, C.M., & Faust, G.W. The instructional quality profile: A curriculum evaluation and design tool. In H.F. O’Neil, Jr. (Ed.),Procedures for instructional systems development. New York: Academic Press, 1979.
Merrill, M.D., Richards, R.E., Schmidt, R.V., & Wood, N.D.The instructional strategy diagnostic profile training manual. San Diego: Courseware, Inc., 1977.
Merrill, M.D., & Wood, N.D.Rules for effective instructional strategies. Instructional Design Series. Orem, Utah: Courseware, Inc., 1975.
Merrill, P.F. Hierarchical and information processing task analysis: A comparison.Journal of Instructional Development, 1978,1(2), 35–40.
Merrill, P.F. Analysis of a procedural task.NSPI Journal, February 1980,19(1), 11–15.
Norman, D.A.Cognitive organization and learning. (Report No. 37). San Diego: Center for Human Information Processing, University of California, 1973.
Reigeluth, C.M. (Ed.),Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status, in press.
Reigeluth, C.M., Merrill, M.D., & Bunderson, C.V. The structure of subject matter content and its instructional design implications.Instructional Science, 1978,7, 107–126.
Reigeluth, C.M., Merrill, M.D., Wilson, B.G., & Spiller, R.T. The elaboration theory of instruction: A model for sequencing and synthesizing instruction.Instructional Science, 1980,9, 195–219.
Reigeluth, C.M., & Rodgers, C.A. The elaboration theory of instruction: Prescriptions for task analysis and design.NSPI Journal. 1980,19, 16–26.
Reigeluth, C.M., & Sari, I.F. From better tests to better texts: Instructional design models for writing better textbooks.NSPI Journal, October 1980,19 (8), 4–9.
Reigeluth, C.M., & Stein, F.S The elaboration theory of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status, in press.
Resnick, L. Issues in the study of learning hiererachies. In L.R. Resnick (Ed.), Hierarchies in children’s learning: A symposium.Instructional Science, 1973,2, 312–323.
Rigney, J.W. Learning strategies: A theoretical perspective. In H.F. O’Neil, Jr. (Ed.),Learning strategies. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
Sari, I.F., & Reigeluth, C.M. Writing and evaluating textbooks: Contributions from instructional theory. In D. Jonassen (Ed.),Technology of text: Principles for structuring, designing, and displaying text. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications, in press.
Scandura, J.M.Structural learning I: Theory and research. London: Gordon & Breach Science Publishers, 1973.
Scandura, J.M. Instructional strategies based on the structural learning theory. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status, in press.
Twelker, P.A., Urbach, F.D., & Buck, J.E.The systematic development of instruction: An overview and basic guide to the literature. Stanford, CA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Media and Technology, 1972.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reigeluth, C.M., Darwazeh, A. The elaboration theory’s procedure for designing instruction. Journal of Instructional Development 5, 22–32 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905492
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905492