Skip to main content
Log in

The design of instructional materials

A top-down approach

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of instructional development

Abstract

This article describes a new model for the analysis and development of instructional materials. This model is in the tradition of human performance engineering. The model combines behavioral and cognitive approaches in a single, systematic approach that has proven successful in a number of different applications. The key to the model lies in its top-down approach to problem analysis. The performance analyst begins by analyzing the overall performance situation, then moves to a general analysis of the appropriate behavioral sequence. After the behavioral sequence is identified, the analyst determines attitudinal and performance heuristics. Finally, the analyst describes or develops subject matter theories to support the use of the heuristics. The design and development process parallels the steps in a top-down task analysis and therefore results in an elegant and efficient developmental effort. The general steps of this approach are described and then illustrated by explaining how it was used to guide the design of an instructional package to teach bank officers how to sell financial services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, Robert W.Human performance engineering: A guide for system designers. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagne, Robert M., and Briggs, Leslie J.Principles of instructional design. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc., 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagne, Robert M.The conditions of learning (3rd Ed.) New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, T. F. Mathetics: The technology of education.Journal of Mathetics, 1:1, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, T. F.Human competence: Engineering worthy performance. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, James G. Some examples of cognitive task analysis with instructional implications. Chapter 14 inAptitude, Learning, and Instruction (Vol. 2) (Richard E. Snow, Pat-Anthony Federico, and William E. Montague, Eds.) Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, Assoc., 1980, pp. 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harless, J.An ounce of analysis (is worth a pound of objectives). McLean Virginia: Harless Performance Guild, Inc., 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, N. P., and King, D. R. Operant learning, cognitive development and job aids.Improving Human Performance Quarterly, 1979,8:1, 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, P. The role of theory in mathetics.NSPI Journal, April, 1980, 24–28.

  • Harmon, N. P. Holistic performance analysis.Educational Technology, November 1980, 5–13.

  • Harmon, P. Simplifying training with job aids.Computerworld, August 31, 1981,XV, 35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, P. Task analysis: A top-down approach.Performance and Instruction Journal, in press.

  • Horn, Robert E.How to write information mapping. Lexington, Mass.: Information Resources, Inc., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, R. A., and English, F. W.Needs assessment: Concept and application. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mager, R. F., and Pipe, P.Analyzing performance problems. Belmont, Calfornia: Fearon Publishing, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. Content analysis via concept elaboration theory.Journal of Instructional Development, 1977,1:1, 10–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rummler, Geary A. The performance audit. Chapter 14 in Robert L. Craig, Ed.,Training and Development Handbook (2nd Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scandura, Joseph.Structural learning. New York: Gordon and Breach, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A.Models of thought. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lehn, Kurt, and Brown, John Seely. Planning nets: A representation for formalizing analogies and semantic models of procedural skills. Chapter 18 inAptitude, Learning, and Instruction (Vol. 2) (Richard E. Snow, Pat-Anthony Federico, and William E. Montague, Eds.) Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, Assoc., 1980, pp. 95–137.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Paul Harmon is president of Harmon Associates, a consulting firm specializing in the analysis of human performance and the development of training programs for computer companies and financial institutions. He is especially interested in integrating the cognitive and behavioral aspects of improving human performance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harmon, P. The design of instructional materials. Journal of Instructional Development 6, 6–14 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905111

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905111

Keywords

Navigation