Skip to main content
Log in

Incompatibility in the sweet potato. A review

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Anonymous. 1947. Research and Farming. 17th Ann. Rept. N. Carolina Agric. Exp. Sta,6(3): 33.

  2. Bailey, W. K. 1937 and 1938.In: Ann. Repts. Fed. Exp. Sta., Mayagüez, Puerto Rico.

  3. Brewbaker, J. L. 1957. Pollen cytology and self incompatibility systems in plants. Jour.Hered.48: 271–277.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chatterjee, D., and Nagbiswas, S. C. 1952. Some observations on the floral biology of the sweet potato. Jour. Ind. Bot. Soc31: 352–357.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fujise, K. 1964. Studies on flowering, seed setting, and self-and cross-incompatibility in the varieties of sweet potato. Bull. Kyushu Agr. Expt. Sta.9: 123–246.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harmon, S. A. 1960. Genetic studies and compatibilities in the sweet potato(Ipomoea batatas). Diss. Abstr.21: L. C. Misc. Card60(2976): 411–412 (Abstr.).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hernandez, T. P., and Miller, J. C. 1962. Self-and cross-incompatibilities in the sweet potato. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.81: 428–433.

    Google Scholar 

  8. —, and —. 1964. Further studies on incompatibility in the sweet potato. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.85: 426–429.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Juliano, J. B. 1934. Morphology of the sweet potato,Ipomoea batatas (Linn.) Poir. Philipp. Agric.23: 833–852.

    Google Scholar 

  10. King, J. R., and Bamford, R. 1937. The chromosome number inIpomoea and related genera. Jour. Hered.28: 278–282.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Knight, Robert J., Jr. 1959. Compatibility relations in the Concolvulaceae. Proc. IX Intern. Cong. Bot., Montreal: 195 (Abstr.).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lewis, D. 1949. incompatibility in flowering plants. Biol. Rev. Cambridge Philos. Soc.24: 472–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nishiyama, Ichizo, Fujise, K., Teramura, T., and Miyazaki, T. 1961. Studies of sweet potato and its related species. I. Comparative investigations on the chromosome numbers and the main characters ofIpomoea species in section Batatas. Jap. Jour. Breeding11: 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nichiyama, Ichizo. 1961. The origin of the sweet potato plant. Proc. 10th Pac. Sci. Congr., Honolulu, Hawaii, 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pandey, K. K. 1957. Genetics of self-incompatibility inPhysalis ixocarpa. Brot. —A new system. Amer. Jour. Bot.44: 879–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pandey, K. K. 1960. Evolution of gametophytic and sporophytic systems of self-incompatibility in angiosperms. Evolution14: 98–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Poole, C. F. 1955. Sweet potato genetic studies. Hawaii Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 27.

  18. Riley, H. P. 1936. The genetics and physiology of self sterility in the genusCap-sella. Genetics21: 24–39.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shinjo, C., and Omura, T. 1962. Studies on incompatibility in sweet potato. I. Classification based on cross incompatibility. Jap. Jour. Breeding12: 226–230 (In Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Steinbauer, C. E. 1962. Principal sweet potato varieties developed in the United States, 1940–1960. Hort. News, N. Jersey State Hort. Soc.43: 123–124, 129.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stout, A. B. 1926. Further notes on the flowers and seeds of sweet potatoes. Jour. N. Y. Bot. Gard.27: 129–135.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Takahashi, M. 1937. Self-and cross-fertility and sterility studies of the sweet potato(Ipomoea batata, Lam.) Masters Thesis, University of Hawaii, 29 pp.

  23. Terao, H. 1934. Cross sterility groups in varieties of sweet potatoes. Pl. Br. News9: 1163–1167.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ting, Y. C, and Kehr, A. E. 1953. Meiotic studies in the sweet potato. Jour. Hered.44: 207–211.

    Google Scholar 

  25. —, and Miller, J. C. 1957. A cytological study of the sweet potato plantIpomoea batatas (L.) Lam. and its related species. Amer. Nat.91: 197–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Togari, Yosizi, and Kawahara, Utarô. 1942 a. Studies on the self-and cross-incompatibility in sweet potato. I. On the different grades of compatibility among the compatible matings. Bull. Imperial Agric. Exp. Sta. Tokyo52: 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  27. Togari, Yosizi, and Kawahara, Utarô. 1942 b. Studies on the different grades of self-and cross-incompatibilities in sweet potato. II. Pollen behavior in the incompatible combinations. Bull. Imp. Agric. Exp. Sta. Tokyo52: 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  28. —, and —. 1942 c. Studies on the self-and crossing compatibility in sweet potato. III. The possibility of inducing pseudo-fertility by means of bud pollination. Proc. Crop. Sci. Soe. Japan14: 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Van Schreven, A. C. 1953. Investigations on the flower biology and compatibility of sweet potato(Ipomoea batatas Poir.) including some preliminary trials on the germination of the seed. Landbouw25: 305–346.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wada, V. 1935. Experiments in the breeding and heredity of sweet potatoes. Jap. Jour. Gen.2: 137–144.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Waite, M. B. 1907. Sweet potato. In: L. H. Bailey, Cyclopedia of American Agriculture, Vol.2, Crops. 613–623.

  32. Wang, Hsia. 1964. A study on the self-and cross-incompatibilities in the sweet potato in Taiwan (Formosa). Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.84: 424–430.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Warmke, H. E., and Cruzado, H. J. 1949. Observations on flowering and fertility in some varieties of Jersey and moist-flesh sweet potatoes. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.54: 391–398.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin, F.W. Incompatibility in the sweet potato. A review. Econ Bot 19, 406–415 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02904812

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02904812

Keywords

Navigation