Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

W. Arthur Lewis lecture: Should there be a marshall plan for eastern europe?

  • Articles
  • Published:
The Review of Black Political Economy

Abstract

The desirability of massive financial aid to support the transition of East European countries to market economies is considered in the light of structural adjustment experience of Latin American countries. It is argued that, politically, an autonomous state is necessary to guide the restructuring. The democratization of Eastern Europe decreases the autonomy of the state. Economically, recent experience in Latin America and Eastern Europe has demonstrated that reforms take place during periods of stringency rather than affluence. It is therefore argued that trade and foreign investment are preferable to generous aid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Gustav Ranis and John C. Fei, “Development Economics: What Next?” inThe State of Economic Development, Gustav Ranis and T. Paul Schultz eds. (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988), pp. 100–136.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Talcott Parsons,The Social System (Glencoe, Ill: The Free Press, 1951); Neil J. Smelser,The Sociology of Modern Life (Englewood, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963); Irma Adelman and Cynthia Taft Morris,Society, Politics and Economic Development: A Quan-titative Approach (Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Simon S. Kuznets, “Economic Growth and Income Inequality,”American Economic Review 45 (1955), pp. 1–28; Irma Adelman and Cynthia Taft Morris,Social Equity and Economic Growth in Developing Countries (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Douglass C. North,The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973); Irma Adelman, “Social and Economic Development at the Micro Level—A Tentative Hypothesis,” inMicro Aspects of Eco-nomic Development, Eliezer B. Ayal ed. (New York: Praeger, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Adelman and Morris (1967), see note 2.

  6. Adelman and Morris (1967).

  7. David E. Apter,The Politics of Modernization (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965); David E. Apter,Political Change (New York: Frank Cass, 1973); Samuel P. Huntington and Joan M. Nelson,No Easy Choice: Political Participation in Developing Countries (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Adelman and Morris (1973), see note 3.

  9. Adelman and Morris (1973).

  10. Huntington and Nelson (1976), see note 7.

  11. Ima Adelman and Jairus M. Hihn, “The Dynamics of Political Change,”Economic Development and Cultural Change 33 (1984), pp. 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuznets (1955), see note 3.

  13. Adelman and Morris (1967).

  14. Apter (1973), see note 7.

  15. Apter (1973).

  16. Irma Adelman, “Development Economics—A Reassessment of Goals,”American Economic Review 65 (1975), pp. 302–309; Partha Dasgupta, “Well-being and the Extent of its Realization in Poor Countries,” Development Economics Research Programme, London School of Economics, No. 19 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Alber O. Hirschman, “Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Further Reflections and a Survey of Recent Contributions,” inEssays in Trespassing (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rezso Nyers, “Inter-relations Between Policy and the Economic Reform in Hungary,”Journal of Comparative Economics 7 (1983), pp. 211–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Joseph C. Brada and John M. Montias, “Industrial Policy in Eastern Europe: A Three Country Comparison,”Journal of Comparative Economics 8 (1984), pp. 377–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ibid.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bela Balassa, “The Hungarian Economic Reform,” 1968–82,”Banca Nazionale del Lavoro 141 (1983), pp. 163–184.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zsuzsa Bekker, “Adjustment Patterns and Problems in East European Countries: An International Comparison,” International Labor Organization, International Employment Policies Working Paper 12 (1987).

  23. ted NationsWorld Economic Survey (New York: United Nations, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Brada and Montias (1984), see note 19.

  25. Bekker (1987), see note 22.

  26. Bela Balassa, “Adjustment Policies in Developing Countries: A Reassessment,”World Development 12 (1984), pp. 955–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Adelman, I., D. Vujovic, P. Berck and M. Labus (1990), “Adjustment under Different Trade Strategies: A Mean-Variance Analysis with a CGE Model of the Yugoslav Economy,” inTrade Theory and Economic Reform: North, South and East Essays in Honor of Bela Balassa, Jaime de Melo and Andre Sapir eds. (Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Excludes Romania.

  29. Romania is an exception.

  30. Bulgaria is an exception.

  31. In some East European countries the inflation is suppressed.

  32. Excess liquidity is defined as the ratio of nominal financial assets held by households to GDP at current prices.

  33. Hollis B. Chenery, Sherman Robinson, and Moshe Syrquin,Industrialization and Growth: A Comparative Study (London: Oxford University Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Janos Kornai,Economics of Shortage (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bela Balassa,Comparative Advantage, Trade Policy, and Economic Development (New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1989). $

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Adelman, I. W. Arthur Lewis lecture: Should there be a marshall plan for eastern europe?. Rev Black Polit Econ 19, 17–42 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02903822

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02903822

Keywords

Navigation