This article is based upon a key speech that Professor Robert Bates gave at the 13th Annual Conference of the Association of Chinese Political Studies (ACPS) held in Bethesda, Maryland between October 17–18, 1998. Professor Bates observes that there is a sense of crisis among comparative political scientists and central to their concerns is an apparent loss of diversity. Professor Bates believes that homogenization presents an opportunity for comparatists to redirect their comparative social inquiries. He argues that comparative politics is a field that is based upon method; that the presumed homogenization of politics, globally, and the existence of large-scale collections of data, highlight the utility of returning to large-N, cross-national research; and that the subfields of political economy and development are best positioned to secure rapid advances from their redirection. He also emphasizes that we need to blend cross-national statistical research with in-depth case studies, arguing that the two are not substitutes but rather complements, and should be pursued in tandem. Professor Bates further argues that there is an “over supply” of theory in comparative politics and debates over theory should be based on assessments of the theory’s capacity to account for outcomes. In this sense, questions of theory cannot and should not be separated from questions of method. A good theory, in practice, provides a powerful engine of empirical discovery.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Alesina, Alberto, and Dani Rodrik. 1994. Distributive Politics and Economic Growth.Quarterly Journal of Economics 109 (2):465–491.
Amin, Samir. 1974.Accumulation on a World Scale: A Critique of the Theory of Underdevelopment. Translated by Brian Pearce. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Bank, World. 1998.World Development Indicators. Washington DC: Oxford University Press for the World Bank.
Barro, Robert, and Jong-Wah Lee. 1993. International Comparisons of Educational Attainment.NBER Working Paper.
Bates, Robert, and Da Hsiang Donald Lien. 1985. A Note on Taxation and Representative Government.Politics and Society 14 (1).
Bates, Robert H., Avner Greif, Margaret Levi, Jean-Laurent Rosenthal, and Barry Weingast. 1998.Analytic Narratives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cowhey, Peter F., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1995.Structure and Policy in Japan and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Firmin-Sellers, Kathryn. 1995. The Politics of Property Rights.American Political Science Review 89 (4):867–882.
Frieden, Jeffry A. 1991.Debt and Democracy. Princeton: PRinceton University Press.
George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett. 1998.Case Study and Theory Development. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Londregan, John B., and Keith T. Poole. 1990. Poverty, The Coup Trap, and the Seizure of Executive Power.World Politics 42 (2):151–84.
North, Douglass C., and Barry R. Weingast. 1989. Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolutions of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England.Journal of Economic History 69:803–832.
Przeworski, Adam, and Femando Limongi. 1997. Modernization: Theories and Facts.World Politics 49 (2):155–183.
Rodrik, Dani. 1991. Policy Uncertainty and Private Investment in Developing Countries.The Journal of Development Economics 36 (2):229–243.
Rogowski., Ronald. 1989.Commerce and Coalitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Summers, R., and A. Heston. 1988. The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons.Quarterly Journal of Economics 1991 (May): 1–25.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bates, R.H. The future in comparative politics. J OF CHIN POLIT SCI 4, 1–17 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02903566
- Ivory Coast
- Analytic Narrative
- Comparative Politics
- CHINESE Political Science
- Game Theoretic Model