Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

National human rights commissions in Asia

  • Published:
Human Rights Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amnesty International.Sri Lanka: Under Scrutiny by the Human Rights Committee, London: AI Publications, December 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amnesty International.The Philippines—Not Forgotten: The Fate of the “Disappeared.” London: Al Publications, November 1996a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amnesty International.Sri Lanka: Wavering Commitment to Human Rights: London: AI Publications, August 1996b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amnesty Internationa.Bangladesh: Proposed Standards for a National Human Rights Commission. London: AI Publications, June 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amnesty International.Indonesia: An Audit of Human Rights Reform. London: AI Publications, March 1999a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amnesty International.Sri Lanka: Torture in Custody. London: AI Publications, June 1999b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. Personal Interviews with Former Members of the NHRC, Journalists, and Academics. New Delhi, India. March 2001.

  • Asian Charter on Human Rights. 1997. Reproduced inAsia-Pacific Human Rights Documents and Resources, edited by Fernand de Varennes. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangkok Declaration. 1993. Reproduced inAsia-Pacific Human Rights Documents and Resources, edited by Fernand de Varennes. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Joanne R., and Daniel Bell, eds.The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Daniel A..East Meets West: Human Rights and Democracy in East Asia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Human Rights Foundation.Working with National Human Rights Institutions Overseas: The Role of Canadian Expertise and Resources Ottawa, Canada CHRF, March 5–6, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavan, S. B. “India: The National Human Rights Commission Bill, 1993.”Report of the Lawyers’ Committee for Human Rights, New York: Lawyers’ Committee for Human Rights, 1993. Cited in Norchi, “The National Human Rights Commission of India as a Value-Creating Institution,” inHuman Rights: Positive Policies in Asia and the Pacific Rim, edited by John D. Montgomery. Hollis, NH: Hollis Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative.The Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka—The First Year. New Delhi: Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (n.d.). Government of Australia. On-line Database.

  • Dhavan, Rajeev. “More Is Not Always More: Unto Us a Human Rights Commission is Given-but Why?”Working Paper no. 18, Public Interest Legal Support and Research Centre New Delhi, May 1993. Cited in Norchi, “The National Human Rights Commission of India as a Value-Creating Institution”, inHuman Rights: Positive Policies in Asia and the Pacific Rim, edited by John D. Montgomery. Hollis, NH: Hollis Publishing Company.

  • Falk, Richard A.,Human Rights and State Sovereignty. New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers., 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, Anne. “Making Human Rights Treaty Obligations a Reality: Working with New Actors and Partners.” InThe Future of UN Human Rights Treaty Monitoring, edited by Philip Alston and James Crawford. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, Mario. “Sri Lanka’s New Human Rights Commission.”Human Rights Quarterly 20 (May 2000): 281–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatchard, John. “National Human Rights Commissions in the Commonwealth.” Background Paper for the Conference on Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative/Institute for Public Policy Research. London, 16–17 October 1997.

  • House of Representatives. Republic of the Philippines. House Bill No. 5039, 1998, Manila.

  • International Commission of Jurists. “Commission and Committees on Human Rights.” InThe Failed Promise: Human Rights in the Philippines since the Revolution of 1986. Geneva, Switzerland: ICJ, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Council on Human Rights Policy. “Indonesia.” InPerformance and Legitimacy: National Human Rights Institutions. Switzerland: International Council on Human Rights Policy, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jetschke, Anja. “Linking the Unlinkable? International Norms and Nationalism in Indonesia and the Philippines.” InThe Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change., edited by Thomas, Risse, Stephen C. Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Sidney. “Regional Institutions for Protecting Human Rights in Asia”.Australian Journal of International Affairs 50 (1996): 269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keck, Margaret, and Kathryn Sikkink.Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, Stephen D..Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liyanage, Sanjeewa. Asian Legal Resource Center. Statement, before the UN Commission on Human Rights. United Nations Press Release, 21 April 1999, HR/CN/99/51.

  • Ministry of Home Affairs. Government of India (n.d.) “Background Note on Setting up of a National Commission on Human Rights-Issues and Tentative Framework.” Cited in Norchi, “The National Human Rights Commission of India as a Value-Creating Institution,” inHuman Rights: Positive Policies in Asia and the Pacific Rim, edited by John D. Montgomery. Hollis, NH: Hollis Publishing Company.

  • Montgomery, John D., ed.Human Rights: Positive Policies, in Asia and the Pacific Rim. Hollis, NH: Hollis Publishing Company, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravsik, Andrew. “The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe.”International Organization 54 (Spring 2000): 217–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair, Ravi. “National Human Rights Institutions in the Asia-Pacific Region.” Notes of a presentation at a Round Table organized by the Canadian Human Rights Foundation on “Working with National Human Rights Institutions Overseas: The Role of Canadian Expertise and Resources.” Ottawa, Canada, March 5–6 1998, 45–47.

  • Nair, Ravi. Personal Interview. New Delhi, India. March 2001.

  • Nair, Ravi. 1992,New York Times: A10. Cited in Norchi, “The National Human Rights Commission of India as a Value-Creating Institution,”Human Rights: Positive Policies in Asia and the Pacific Rim, edited by in John D. Montgomery. Hollis, NH: Hollis Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Human Rights Commission The Protection of Human Rights Act 1993. New Delhi: National Human Rights Commission, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Human Rights CommissionHuman Rights Newsletter. New Delhi: NHRC, 2000, 2001a.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Human Rights CommissionImportant Instructions/Guidelines. New Delhi: NHRC, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Human Rights CommissionAnnual Report. New Delhi: NHRC, multiple years.

  • National Human Rights Commission. Personal Interviews with Commissioners. New Delhi, India. March 2001b.

  • National Human Rights Commission of Indonesia. “Komnas HAM History,”Annual Report 1994. Jakarta: Komnas HAM, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemenzo, Francisco. “People’s Diplomacy and Human Rights: The Philippine Experience.” InHuman Rights and International Relations in the Asia-Pacific Region, edited by James T.H. Tang, ed. London: Pinter, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norchi, Charles H. “The National Human Rights Commission of India as a Value-Creating Institution.” InHuman Rights: Positive Policies in Asia and the Pacific Rim, edited by John D. Montgomery. Hollis, NH: Hollis Publishing Company, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, Sergio, and David Carlos Baluarte. “National Strategies—Human Rights Commissions, Ombudsmen, and National Action Plans.” Background Paper forHuman Development Report, 2000.

  • Reif, Linda. “Building Democratic Institutions: The Role of National Human Rights Institutions in Good Governance and Human Rights Protection.”Harvard Human Rights Journal 13 (Spring 2000): 1–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schedler, Andreas, Larry Diamond, and Marc F. Plattner.The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sicam, Paulynn. “The Work of the Philippines Commission on Human Rights.” Workshop on Human Rights Education and National Institutions. Jakarta, March 18–21, 1997.

  • Sikkink, Kathryn. “Human Rights, Principled Issue-Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America.”International Organization 47 (Summer, 1993): 411–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South Asia Human Rights Documentation Center.National Human Rights Institutions in the Asia Pacific Region: Report of the Alternate NGO Consultation on the Second Asia-Pacific Regional Workshop on National Human Rights Institutions. New Delhi: SAHRDC, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • South Asia Human Rights Documentation Center,Komnas HAM—The Indonesian Human Rights Commission: The Formative Years. New Delhi: SAHRDC, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations.National Institutions: A Handbook, on the Establishment and Strengthening of National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights. Geneva: United Nations Publications, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • —.United Nations Action in the Field of Human Rights. New York: United Nationas, 1983, 344–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. On-line database.

  • Vijayakumar, V. “The Working of the National Human Rights Commission: A Perspective.” InHuman Rights in India: Historical, Social and Political Perspectives, edited by, C.J. Nirmal. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Sonia Cardenas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cardenas, S. National human rights commissions in Asia. Hum Rights Rev 4, 30–51 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02903199

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02903199

Keywords

Search

Navigation