Abstract
Previous research into intergroup attribution has addressed mainly the behavior of groups to which members are ascribed (e.g. gender, race). The attribution processes of groups of which membership is achieved (e.g. friendship groups) is less well understood, and the current study sought to address this. Fifty-five undergraduate participants were asked to explain the positive and negative behavior of a member of the in-group and a member of the out-group. As predicted, the participants attributed an in-group member's positive behavior more, and their negative behavior less, to internal, global, and specific causes than they did the corresponding behavior of an out-group member. There was also evidence that the participants employed a strategy of out-group derogation in their attributions: they made a higher intemality rating for an out-group member's negative behavior than they did for that person's positive behavior. It is proposed that the current study's use of achieved groups maximized participants' levels of group identification, and that this in turn motivated behavioral strategies aimed at protecting that identity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brady, K.L., Trafimow, D., Eisler, R.M., & Southard, D.R. (1996). The role of attributions in competitive situations.Sex Roles, 35, 639–650.
Branscombe, N.R., & Wann, D.L. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial.European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 641–657.
Cotterell, J. (1996).Social networks and social influences in adolescence. New York: Routledge.
Deaux, K., & Emswiller, T. (1974). Explanations of successful performance on sex-linked tasks: what is skill for the male is luck for the female.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 80–85.
Deaux, K., Reid, A., Mizrahi, K., & Ethier, K.A. (1995). Parameters of social identity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 280–291.
De Cremer, D., & Oosterwegel, A. (2000). Collective self-esteem, personal self-esteem, and collective efficacy in in-group and out-group evaluations.Current Psychology, 18, 326–339.
Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P., & Ouwerkerk, J.W. (1999). Self-categorization, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity.European Journal of Social Psychology, 29,371–389.
Euemers, N., Wilke, H., & Van Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective identity enhancement strategies.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 766–778.
Greenberg, J., & Rosenfield, D. (1979). Whites' ethnocentrism and their attributions for the behaviour of blacks: a motivational bias.Journal of Personality, 47, 643–657.
Guerin, B. (1994). What do people think about the risks of driving? Implications for traffic safety interventions.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 994–1021.
Guerin, B. (1999). Children's intergroup attribution bias for liked and disliked peers.The Journal of Social Psychology, 139, 583–589.
Heider, F. (1958).The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
Hewstone, M. (1989).Causal attribution: from cognitive processes to collective beliefs. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Hewstone, M. (1990). The “ultimate attribution error”? A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution.European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 311–335.
Hewstone, M., & Ward, C. (1985). Ethnocentrism and causal attribution in Southeast Asia.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 614–623.
Hewstone, M., Jaspers, J., & Lalljee, M. (1982). Social representations, social attribution and social identity: the intergroup images of “public” and “comprehensive” schoolboys.European Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 241–269.
Hunter, J.A., Platow, M.J., Howard, M.L., & Stringer, M. (1996). Social identity and intergroup evaluative bias: realistic categories and domain specific self-esteem in a conflict setting.European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 631–647.
Islam, R., & Hewstone, M. (1993). Intergroup attributions and affective consequences in majority and minority groups.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 936–950.
Jones, E.E., & Davis, K.E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: the attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.
Joseph, S., Wetherall, K., & Stringer, M. (1997). Attributions for unemployment in Northern Ireland: does it make a difference what your name is?The Irish Journal of Psychology, 18, 341–348.
Kelley, H.H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution.American Psychologist, 28, 107–128.
Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1991). Self-esteem and intergroup comparisons: toward a theory of collective self-esteem. In J. Suls and T.A. Wills (Eds.),Social comparison: contemporary theory and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaurn.
Mummendey, A., & Schreiber, H-J. (1983). Better or just different? Positive social identity by discrimination against, or by differentiation from outgroups.European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 389–397.
North, A.C., & Hargreaves, D.J. (1999). Music and adolescent identity.Music Education Research, 1, 75–92.
Singh, R., Choo, W.M., & Poh, L.L. (1998). In-group bias and fair-mindedness as strategies of self-presentation in intergroup perception.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 147–162.
Tajfel, H. (1981).Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W.G. Austin and S. Worschel (Eds.),The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Tajfel, H., Flament, C, Billig, M.G., & Bundy, R.P. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour.European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–178.
Tarrant, M., Hargreaves, D.J., & North, A.C. (2001). Social categorization, self-esteem, and the musical preferences of male adolescents.The Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 565–581.
Taylor, D.M., & Jaggi, V. (1974). Ethnocentrism and causal attribution in a South Indian context.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 5, 162–171.
Turner, J.C. (1978). Social categorization and social discrimination in the minimal group paradigm. In H. Tajfel (Ed.),Differentiation between social groups: studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
Turner, J.C, Brown, R.J., & Tajfel, H. (1979). Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism.European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 187–204.
Wann, D.L. & Schrader, M.P. (2000). Controllability and stability in the self-serving attributions of sport spectators.The Journal of Social Psychology, 140, 160–168.
Zillmann, D., & Gan, S. (1997). Musical taste in adolescence. In D.J. Hargreaves and A.C. North (Eds.),The social psychology of music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zillmann, D., Aust, C.F., Hoffman, K.D., Love, C.C., Ordman, V.L., Pope, J.T., Seigler, P.D., & Gibson, R.J. (1995). Radical rap: does it further ethnic division?Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 16, 1–25.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tarrant, M., North, A.C. Explanations for positive and negative behavior: the intergroup attribution bias in achieved groups. Curr Psychol 23, 161–172 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02903076
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02903076