Summary
1550 samples of urine from children suspected to have urinary tract infection were cultured. Esch. coli was the commonest organism found. The next in frequency were coagulase positive staphylococci,B. proteus, Strep. faecalis, Pseud. pyocyaneus and klebsiella. Mendalamine was found to be the most effective antiseptic against urinary pathogens isolated in the present study. However, chloramphenicol remains the drug of choice for coagulase positive staphylococci. Gentamicin and colomycin should be used against resistant strains ofEsch. coli andPseud. pyocyaneus respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banerjee, N.G. (1963). Urinary tract infection. The commonest organism and its sensitivity to antimicrobial drug.Indian J. Med. Sci. 17, 819.
Bawa, Y.S., Khanna, S.D. and Wahi, P.N. (1961). Antibiotic sensitivity of common organisms in urinary infection. Ibid.15, 20.
Belapurkar, K.H., Tahija, R.K. and Kaul, K.K. (1970). Urinary tract infection. II. Saide laboratory and bacteriologic observations.Indian Pediat. 7, 449.
Bhujwala, R.A. (1969), Susceptibility of gram negative bacilli isolated from urinary tract to Mathe-namine mandelate and other antimicrobial agents. In vitro study.Indian J. Med. Res. 57, 1846.
Bruke, J.B. (1961). Pyelonephritis in infancy and childhood.Lancet. 1, 1116.
Campbell, M. (1961). Clinical Pediatric Urology.Philadelphia, Saunders.
Dasgupta, L.R. and Sharma, K.D. (1969). In vitro susceptibility of urinary pathogens to Methana-mine mandelate (Mendalamine).Indian J. Mid. Res. 57, 1809.
Deshmukh, C.K. and Sharma, K.D. (1970). Quantitative study of urine—A comparative study of semiquantitative method with pour plate method.Indian J. Path. & Bact. 13, 12.
Garg, B.K. (1966). Urinary infections in childhood.Indian Pediat. 3, 1.
Holt, R.J. and Newman, R.L. (1968). Gentamicin in urinary infections of children.Arch. Dis. Childh. 43, 329.
Kass, E.H. (1957). Bacteriuria and the diagnosis of infections of the urinary tract with observations on the use of methionine as a urinary antiseptic.Arch. Intern. Med. 100, 709.
Kass, E.H. and Zangwill, D.P. (1960).In Biology of Pyelonephritis, edited by Quinne, E.L. and Kass, E.H.Little Brawn, Boston. p. 663.
Kunin, C.M. and Halmagyi, N.E. (1962). Urinary tract infection in school children. II. Charac terisation of invading organisms.New Engl. J. Med. 266, 1297.
Kunin, C.H., Deutscher, R. and Fttagmin, A. (1964). Urinary tract infection in school children.Medicine (Baltimore),43, 91.
Mehrotra, G.C. and Jain. K.C. (1959). Sensitivity of bacteria from urinary tract infection to Hexamine mandelate and some common antibiotics.J. Indian Med. Assn. 52, 386.
Panda, G.K., Nanda, B.K. and Rahim, M.A. (1966). The bacteriology of urinary tract infection. Ibid.46, 9.
Steel, R.E., Leadbetter, C. and Crawford, J. (1963). Prognosis of childhood urinary tract infection.New Engl. J. Med. 269, 883.
Sengupta. J. and Barua. R. (1964). Observations of bacteriological analysis of urinary tract infection.J. Indian Med. Assn. 43, 4716.
Sengupta, S.R., Bansal, M.P., Deshpande, P.K. and Sharma, K.D. (1972). Bacteriology of urinary tract infection and the effectiveness of antimicrobials against the urinary pathogens.J. Assn. Phys. India,20, 755.
Tyagi, S.P., Tiagi, G.K. and Gupta, U. (1965). Urinary tract infections.J. Indian Med. Assn. 45, 176.
Ullman, A. (1960). The management of urinary tract infections.Delhi Med J. 32, 97.
Ullman, A. (1964). Methanamine mandelate (Mendalamine R) in urinary tract infections.Med. Times,92; 991.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Talib, V.H., Sultana, Z., Talib, N.S. et al. Urinary triact infections in childhood. Indian J Pediatr 41, 368–373 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02900669
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02900669