Abstract
Evaluation with the pot assay at seedling stage in greenhouse showed that oat (Avena sativa) was highly resistant to take-all disease to which, however, wheat (Triticum aestivum) was extremely susceptible. The oat roots were shown to be inhibitory to the invasion and spread of take-all causing fungusG. graminis var.tritici by the following criteria: (i) less infection sites were observed (about 1/7 of those in wheat); (ii) the ectotrophic growth ofG. graminis var.tritici on oat roots was much slower than that on those of wheat, and the runner hyphae appeared as kidney- or fork-shaped hyphopodia on the surface of oat roots which could not be discerned on that of wheat roots; (iii) the period from inoculation to penetration into the epidermis of oat roots was about 2.9 times as long as that of wheat; (iv) the infection hyphae were hindered substantially when it was about to penetrate into the epidermis of oat roots with the mycelium deformed; and (v) the cortical layer of oat roots was revealed to be unsuitable for theG. graminis var.tritici infestation as some lysed hyphae were found therein, and the spread of hyphae from the first layer of cortex to the pericycle needed 108 h, about 1.8 times as long as it did on wheat roots.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Penrose, L. D. J., Two wheat genotypes differ in root disease due toGaeumannomyces graminis without interaction with site, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1995, 27: 133.
Zengel, Z., Graham, R. D., Pedler, J. F., Manganese nutrition and accumulation of phenolics and lignin as related to differential resistance of wheat genotypes to the take-all fungus, Plant and Soil, 1993, 151: 255.
Huber, D. M., McCay-buis, T. S., A multiple component analysis of the take-all disease of cereals, Plant Disease, 1993, 77: 437.
Penrose, L. D. J., Disease in wheat genotypes infected withGaeumannomyces graminis var.tritici, Annals of Applied Biology, 1991, 118: 513.
Osbourn, A. E., Clarke, B. R., Lunness, P. et al., An oat species lacking avenacin is susceptible to infection byGaeumannomyces graminis var.tritici, Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 1994, 45: 457.
Scott, P. R., Variation in host susceptibility6 (eds. Asher, M. J. C., Shipton, P. J.), Biology and Control of Take-all, London: Academic Press, 1981, 219–236.
Crombie, L., Crombie, W. M. L., Whiting, D. A., Structures of the oat root resistance factors to take-all disease, avenacins A-1, A-2, B-1 and B-2 and their companion substance, Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkins Transactions I, 1986(11): 1917.
Dufresne, M., Osbourn, A. E., Definition of tissue-specific and general requirements for plant infection in a phytopathogenic fungus, Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 2001, 14: 300.
Papadopoulou, K., Melton, R. E., Leggett, M. et al., Compromised disease resistance in saponin-deficient plants, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1999, 96: 12923.
Trojanowska, M. R., Osbourn, A. E., Daniels, M. J. et al., Biosynthesis of avenacins and phytosterols in roots of Avena sativa cv. Image, Phytochemistry, 2000, 54: 153.
Liu, C. H., Shang, H. S., Tan, R. X., Infection process of take-all causing fungus (Gaeumannomyces graminis var.tritici) on wheat and oat roots, The Indian Journal of Agricultural Science, 2000, 70: 27.
Holden, J., Relatiooonship between pre-formed inhibitors in oats and infection byGaeumannomyces graminis andPhialophora radicicola, Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 1980, 75: 97.
Penrose, L. D. J., Interpretive value of symptoms of infection byGaeumannomyces graminis var.tritici, Annual of Applied Biology, 1992, 121: 545.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, C., Xue, Y., Shang, H. et al. Resistance of oat to ‘take-all’ causing fungus (Gaeumannomyces graminis var.tritici). Chin.Sci.Bull. 46, 1817–1819 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02900558
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02900558