Skip to main content
Log in

Masses in scalar dynamics

Массы в скалярной динамике

  • Published:
Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970)

Summary

The evolution of masses with a scaleM is investigated in scalar and pseudoscalar gluon theories for the comparison with QCD. The scalar theory shows the increase of effective masses withM, and, therefore, it cannot be a candidate for the theory of strong interactions. In pseudoscalar gluon theory effective masses become lighter at higherM, just like in QCD.

Riassunto

Si analizza l’evoluzione di masse con una scalaM nelle teorie di gluoni pseudoscalari e scalari in confronto con la QCD. La teoria scalare mostra l’incremento conM delle masse effettive, e quindi non può essere candidata alla teoria delle interazioni forti. Nella teoria del gluone pseudoscalare le masse effettive diventano piú leggere perM maggiore proprio come nella QCD.

Реэюме

Исследуется зволюция масс с величиной масщтабаM в скалярной и псевдоскалярной глюонной теориях для сравнения с квантовой хромодинамикой. Скалярная теория укаэывает на увеличение зффективных масс сM и, следовательно, зта теория не может быть кандидатом для теории сильных вэаимодействий. В псевдоскалярной глюонной теории зффективные массы становятся легче при больщихM, точно так же как в квантовой хромодинамике.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Georgi andH. D. Politzer:Phys. Rev. D,14, 1829 (1976);K. E. Eriksson:Nuovo Cimento A,30, 1423 (1963);K. G. Wilson:Phys. Rev. D,3, 1818 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. D. J. Gross andF. Wilczek:Phys. Rev. Lett.,30, 1343 (1973);Phys. Rev. D,8, 3633 (1973);9, 980 (1974);H. Georgi andH. D. Politzer:Phys. Rev. Lett.,30, 1346 (1973);Phys. Rev. D,9, 416 (1974). For a review, seee.g.,E. S. Abers andB. W. Lee:Phys. Rep. C,9, 1 (1973);H. D. Politzer:Phys. Rep. C,14, 131 (1974);V. Novikov, L. Okun, M. Shifman, A. Vainshtein, M. Voloshin andV. Zakhalov:Phys. Rep.,41, 1 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. T. Appelquist andJ. Carazzone:Phys. Rev. D,11, 2856 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. O. Nachtmann andW. Wetzel:Nucl. Phys. B,146, 273 (1978);H. D. Politzer:Nucl. Phys. B,146, 283 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. W. Konetschny:Nucl. Phys. B,152, 153 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. H. D. Politzer:Nucl. Phys. B,117, 397 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. G. ’t Hooft andM. Veltman:Nucl. Phys. B,44, 189 (1972);C. G. Bollini andJ. J. Giambiagi:Phys. Lett. B,40, 566 (1972);G. M. Cicuta andE. Montaldi:Lett. Nuovo Cimento,4, 329 (1972). About the renormalization group in the dimensional regularization, seeJ. C. Collins andA. J. Macfarlane:Phys. Rev. D,15, 1201 (1974).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Zee:Phys. Rev. D,15, 3630 (1973);D. J. Gross: inMéthodes en théories des champs, Les Houches, Session XXVIII, 1975, edited byR. Balian andJ. Zinn-Justin (Amsterdam, 1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Coleman andD. J. Gross:Phys. Rev. Lett.,31, 851 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. K. G. Wilson:Phys. Rev. D,3, 1818 (1971).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Glück andE. Reya:Phys. Lett. B,69, 77 (1977);Phys. Rev. D,16, 3242 (1977);Nucl. Phys. B,156, 456 (1979);E. Reya: DESY preprint 79/02 (1979);J. Ellis, SLAC preprints SLAC-PUB-2121 and 2177 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Bodek, M. Briedenbach, D. L. Dubin, J. E. Elias, J. I. Friedman, H. W. Kendall, J. S. Poucher, E. M. Riordan, M. R. Sogard, D. H. Coward andD. J. Sherden:Phys. Rev. D,20, 1471 (1979);B. A. Gordon, W. A. Loomis, F. M. Pipkin, S. H. Pordes, A. L. Sessoms, W. D. Shambroom, C. Tao, H. L. Anderson, R. M. Fine, R. H. Heisterberg, W. W. Kinnison, H. S. Matis, L. W. Mo, L. C. Myrianthopoulos, S. C. Wright, W. R. Francis, R. G. Hicks, T. B. W. Kirk, T. W. Quirk, V. K. Bharadwaj, N. E. Booth, G. I. Kirkbride, J. Prowdfoot, A. Skuja, M. A. Staton andW. S. C. Williams:Phys. Rev. D,20, 2645 (1979); BEBCCollaboration:Nucl. Phys. B,142, 1 (1978); CDHSCollaboration:Phys. Lett. B,82, 292 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. D. Gromes:Nucl. Phys. B,131, 80 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. K. Koller andH. Kraseman:Phys. Lett. B,88, 119 (1979);K. Koller, T. F. Walsh andP. M. Zerwas:Phys. Lett. B,82, 263 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. G. Altarelli andG. Parisi:Nucl. Phys. B,126, 298 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. D. Bailin andA. Love:Nucl. Phys. B,75, 159 (1974). Our results (3.1) disagree with those in the paper above, but agree with those given inGlück andReya (the third paper in ref. (11)).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work is supported in part by the US Department of Energy under Contract No. EY-76-C-02-3065-000.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tosa, Y. Masses in scalar dynamics. Nuov Cim A 55, 485–494 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02900500

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02900500

Navigation