Skip to main content
Log in

A multivariate approach to assess the taxonomic utility of morphometric characters inDoronicum (Asteraceae, Senecioneae)

  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A multivariate morphometric study based on 22 characters was carried out on samples of the 26 accepted species of the Eurasian and north-African genusDoronicum, to assess whether quantitative, mainly continuous, characters were of use in suggesting, delimiting and structuring natural groups. The study concentrated on three-medium sized to small groups: Mediterranean (D. plantagineum group), European (D. grandiflorum group), and central Asian. Two questions were addressed for each of these groups: species delimitation within them and the inclusion/exclusion of species of uncertain, but putative close affinities. Principal components analysis and discriminant analysis (canonical variates analysis), gave moderately satisfactory results. The addition of doubtfully-related species to presumably natural groups increased cohesiveness of the groups because the between-species differences were minimized when placed in a broader more diverse context. The relative status of the uncertain species, either as outliers or true members, was appropriately depicted by the scatterplots, but more convincingly solved when the species turned out to be outliers. Discrimination between species, which belong to cohesive groups was effective in some cases at least when using discriminant analysis, and the exceptions involved particularly problematic taxa. It was concluded that morphometric characters are a useful complementary source of information in groups where qualitative (in particular, shared) characters are scarce as is the case inDoronicum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott L.A., Bisby F.A., &Rogers D.J. (1985):Taxonomic analysis in biology. Computers, models and databases. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez Fernández I. (1999):Sistemática del género DoronicumL. (Asteraceae, Senecioneae)y análisis filogenético basado en fuentes morfológicas y moleculares. Unpubl. PhD dissertation. Universidad Complutense, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez Fernández I. (2001): Four new combinations in EurasianDoronicum L. (Asteraceae, Senecioneae).Novon 11: 294–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez Fernández I. &Nieto Feliner G. (1999): Lectotypification of 16 species names inDoronicum (Asteraceae, Senecioneae).Taxon 48: 801–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez Fernández I. &Nieto Feliner G. (2000): A new species ofDoronicum (Asteraceae, Senecioneae) from central China.Ann. Bot. Fenn. 37: 249–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez Fernández I., Fuertes Aguilar J., Panero J.L. &Nieto Feliner G. (2001): A phylogenetic analysis ofDoronicum (Asteraceae, Senecioneae) based on morphological, nuclear ribosomal (ITS) and chloroplast (trnL-F) evidence.Molec. Phyl. Evol. 20: 41–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Avetisjan V.E. (1980): RodDoronicum L. v Armenii (The genusDoronicum in Armenia).Biol. Zhurn. Armenii 33: 532–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremer K. (1994): Asteraceae.Cladistics & classification. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavillier F. (1907): Étude sur lesDoronicum a fruits homomorphes.Annuaire Conserv. Jard. Bot. Genève 10: 177–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavillier F. (1911): Nouvelles études sur le genreDoronicum.Annuaire Conserv. Jard. Bot. Genève 13–14: 195–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chacón R. (1987): Contribución al estudio taxonómico del géneroDoronicum L. (Compositae) en la Península Ibérica.Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 43: 253–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappill J.A. (1989): Quantitative characters in phylogenetic analysis.Cladistics 5: 217–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De PinnaM.C.C. (1991): Concepts and tests of homology in the cladistic paradigm.Cladistics 7: 367–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duvigneaud J. (1992): Le genreDoronicum L. en Belgique et dans les régions voisines.Nat. Mosana 45: 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson J.R. (1973): Notes onDoronicum L. in SW Asia.Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 32: 255–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson J.R. (1975):Doronicum L. In:Davis P. H. (ed.),Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands 5, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson J.R. (1978): The genusDoronicum L. in Iran.Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 37: 67–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodálová I. &Marhold K. (1996): Sympatric populations ofSenecio ovatus subsp.ovatus, S. germanicus subsp.germanicus (Compositae) and their hybrid in the Carpatians and the adjacent part of Pannonia.Flora 191: 283–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodálová I. &Marhold K. (1998): Morphometric comparison ofSenecio germanicus andS. nemorensis (Compositae) with a new species from Romania.Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 128: 277–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollis S. &Brummitt R.K. (1992):World geographical scheme for recording plant distributions. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klecka W.R. (1980).Discriminant analysis. Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Sage University paper no. 19. Newbury Park.

  • Legendre P. &Legendre L. (1998):Numerical ecology. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus L.F. (1990): Traditional morphometrics. In:Rohlf F.J. &Bookstein F.L. (eds.),Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, pp. 77–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson C. (1988): Homology in classical and molecular biology.Molec. Biol. Evol. 5: 603–625.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Morales C. &Penas A. (1990): Sobre algunosDoronicum ibéricos.Lagascalia 15: 151–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Morales C., Penas A., Llamas F. &Acedo C. (1994):Doronicum pubescens sp. nov.Lazaroa 14: 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae T.C. (1998): The logical basis for the use of continuous characters in phylogenetic systematics.Cladistics 14: 221–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneath P.H.A. &Sokal R.R. (1973):Numerical taxonomy. The principles and practice of numerical classification. W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens P.F. (1991): Character states, morphological variation and phylogenetic analysis: a review.Syst. Bot. 16: 553–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiele K. (1993): The Holy grail of the perfect character: the cladistic treatment of morphometric data.Cladistics 9: 275–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widder F.J. (1925): Eine neue Pflanze der Ostalpen —Doronicum (SubsectioMacrophylla)cataractarum — und ihre Verwandten.Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 22: 113–184.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Inés Álvarez Fernández.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fernández, I.Á., Feliner, G.N. A multivariate approach to assess the taxonomic utility of morphometric characters inDoronicum (Asteraceae, Senecioneae). Folia Geobot 36, 423–444 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02899989

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02899989

Keywords

Navigation