Abstract
A new species of the genusHypericum, Hypericum carpaticum Mártonfi, is described from Slovakia. It is pentaploid (2n=40) with morphological and chemical features that are most similar to the tetraploid speciesH. dubium Leers from western Europe. The species is most likely of hybridogenous origin, arising as a result of hybridization betweenH. maculatum Crantz andH. perforatum L. It seems that consequent speciation processes and stabilization by inherited apomixis (fromH. perforatum) allowed it to reproduce successfully and to enlarge its distribution area. According to recent knowledge of its distribution, it is necessary to consider it endemic to the Volovské vrchy Mts. in the Carpathians. With regard to its scarcity it merits EN status according to the IUCN criteria.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brutovská R. (1997):Cytogenetická variabilita in vitro regenerovaných rastlín a potomstiev fakultatívne apomiktickej rastliny Hypericum perforatumL. (Cytogenetic variability in vitro regenerants and progenies of facultative apomictic plants Hypericum perforatumL.). PhD Thesis, Faculty of Science, Comenius University, Bratislava.
Chrtek J. &Marhold K. (1998): Species concept in agamic and autogamic complexes.Folia Geobot. 33: 317–318.
Clarke G.C.S. (1976): The northwest European pollen flora, 7.Guttiferae. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 21: 125–142.
Cowan R., Ingrouille M. J. &Lledó M. D. (1998): The taxonomic treatment of agamosperms in the genusLimonium Mill. (Plumbaginaceae).Folia Geobot. 33: 353–366.
Dickinson T. A. (1998): Taxonomy of agamic complexes in plants: A role for metapopulation thinking.Folia Geobot. 33: 327–332.
Erdtman G. (1960): The acetolysis method. A revised description.Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 54: 561–564.
Greuter W., McNeill J., Barrie F.R., Burdet H.M., Demoulin V., Filgueiras T.S., Nicolson D.H., Silva P.C., Skog J.E., Trehane P., Turland N.J. & Hawksworth D.L. (editors & compilers) (2000): International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Saint Louis Code) adopted by the Sixteenth International Botanical Congress St. Louis, Missouri, July–August 1999.Regnum Veg. 138.
Hölzl J. &Ostrowski H. (1987): Johanniskraut (Hypericum perforatum L.) HPLC-Analyse der wichtigen Inhaltsstoffe und deren Variabilität in einer Population.Deutsche Apoth.-Zeitung 127: 1227–1230.
Hörandl E. (1998): Species concepts in agamic complexes: Applications in theRanunculus auricomus complex and general perspectives.Folia Geobot. 33: 335–348.
Kirschner J. (1998): A note on the taxonomy of agamic complexes. A reply to Tim Dickinson.Folia Geobot. 33: 333–334.
Lihová J. &Mártonfi P. (2000): Experimental study on reproduction ofHypericum ×desetangsii nothosubsp.carinthiacum (A. Fröhl.)N. Robson (Hypericaceae).Caryologia 53: 127–132.
Mártonfi P. & Janíková M. (2002): Palynological analysis of sevenHypericum taxa.Biologia (Bratislava) 57 (in press).
Mártonfi P., Michálek J., Hadinec J., Mártonfiová L. &Repčák M. (1999):Hypericum dubium — a new species of the Czech flora.Preslia 71: 337–348.
Mártonfi P., Repčák M., Ciccarelli D. &Garbari F. (2001):Hypericum perforatum L. — chemotype without rutin from Italy.Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 29: 659–661.
Mártonfi P., Repčák M. &Mihoková L. (1996):Hypericum maculatum Crantz subsp.maculatum ×H. perforatum L. (Hypericaceae): Corroboration of natural hybridization by secondary metabolite analysis.Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 31: 245–250.
Matzk F., Meister A. &Schubert I. (2000): An efficient screen for reproductive pathways using mature seeds of monocots and dicots.Pl. J. 21: 97–108.
Noack K.L. (1939): UberHypericum-Kreuzungen. VI. Fortpflanzungsverhältnisse und Bastarde vonH. perforatum L. Z.Indukt.Abstammungs-Vererbungsl. 76: 569–601.
Noack K.L. (1941): Geschlechtsverlust und Bastardierung beim Johanniskraut.Forsch. & Fortschr. 17: 13–15.
Robson N.K.B. (1957): 112/12.Hypericum maculatum Crantz.Bot. Soc. Brit. Isles Proc. 2: 237–238.
Robson N.K.B. (1958):Hypericum maculatum in Britain and Europe.Bot. Soc. Brit. Isles Proc. 3: 99–100.
Robson N.K.B. (1977): Studies in the genusHypericum L. (Guttiferae). I. Infrageneric classification.Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), Bot. 5: 291–355.
Robson N.K.B. (1981): Studies in the genusHypericum L. (Guttiferae) 2. Characters of the genus.Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), Bot. 8: 55–226.
Stace C.A. (1998): Species recognition in agamosperms — the need for a pragmatic approach.Folia Geobot. 33: 319–326.
Vezey E.L., Shah V.P. &Skvarla J.J. 1992. A numerical approach to pollen sculpture terminology.Pl. Syst. Evol. 181: 245–254.
Vitek E. (1998): Are the taxonomic concepts of agamospermous genera useful for autogamous groups — a critical discussion using the example ofEuphrasia (Scrophulariaceae).Folia Geobot. 33: 249–352.
Walker J.W. &Doyle J.A. (1975): The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: Palynology.Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 62: 644–723.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mártonfi, P. New species of the genusHypericum sect.Hypericum (Guttiferae) from Slovakia. Folia Geobot 36, 371–384 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02899987
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02899987