Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Occupation equity: A black and white portrait of women in the united states military

  • Articles
  • Published:
The Review of Black Political Economy

Abstract

This study examines U.S. military occupation equity with a special focus on African-American women. The dependent variable was occupation category. A three-way interaction of race by gender by mental group was found, making untenable the contention that mental group solely predicts personnel assignment to occupation category. Women, and particularly African-American women, are underrepresented in the core, technical occupations and overrepresented in the nontechnical, support occupations examined in this study. The opposite is true for white men. Social and psychological factors are postulated regarding women’s disproportionate employment in traditionally female and lower status occupations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Judith S. Bridges, “Sex Differences in Occupational Performance Expectations,”Psychology of Women Quarterly, Volume 12 (1988), pp. 75–90; Kathryn M. Moore, “Women’s Access and Opportunity in Higher Education: Toward the Twenty-First Cen-tury,”Comparative Education, Volume 23 (1987), pp. 23-34; Margaret Sutherland, “Women in Higher Education: Effects of Crises and Change,”Higher Education, Volume 17 (1988), pp. 479-490; Gail E. Thomas, “Black College Students and Their Major Field Choice,” in A.S. Pruitt (ed.)In Pursuit of Equality in Higher Education (Dix Hills, NY: General Hall, 1987), pp. 105-115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rebecca M. Blank, “Women’s Paid Work, Household Income and House Well-Being,” in S.E. Rix (ed.)The American Woman 1988–89 (New York: W.W. Norton, 1988), pp. 122–161; Barbara F. Reskin, “Occupational Resegregation,” in S.E. Rix (ed.),The American Woman 1988–89, pp. 258-263.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Michelene R. Maison, “Black Women’s Sex Roles: The Social Context for a New Strategy,”Journal of Social Issues, Volume 39 (1983), pp. 101–113.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Reskin as in note 2.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cynthia Harrison, “A Richer Life: A Reflection on the Women’s Movement,” pp. 53–77 in Rix (ed.) note 2.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blank; Reskin as in note 2“.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sara E. Rix (ed.) “Editor’sNote,”The American Woman, pp. 13-22.

  8. Sutherland, as in note 1“.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Blank, as in note 2“.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rix as in note 7.

  11. Althea Smith and Abigail J. Stewart, “Approaches to Studying Racism and Sexism in Black Women’s Lives,”Journal of Social Issues, Volume 39 (1983), pp. 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bridges; S. Vondracek and E. Kirchner, “Vocational Development in Early Childhood: An Examination of Young Children’s Expressions of Vocational Aspirations,”Journal of Vocational Behavior, Volume 5 (1974), pp. 251–260; Linda K. Wolfe and Nancy E. Betz, “Traditionally of Choice and Sex Role Identification as Moderators of the Consequences of Occupational Choice in College Women,”Journal of Vocational Behavior, Volume 18 (1981), pp. 43-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moore, as in note 1“; Sutherland, as in note 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Carolyn Falkowski and William Falk, “Homemaking as an Occupational Plan: Evidence from National Longitudinal Study,”Journal of Vocational Behavior, Volume 2 (1983), pp. 227–242; J.P. Gump, “Comparative Analysis of Black Women’s and White Women’s Sex-Role Attitudes,”Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Volume 43 (1975), pp. 858-863; Maslon, as in note 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jayne Gackenbach, “The Effects of Race, Sex and Career Goal on Difference in Sex Role Attitudes at Home and at Work,”Journal of Vocational Behavior, Volume 12 (1978), pp. 93–101; Gump, as in note 14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Elsie Smith, “The Career Development of Young Black Females: The Forgotten Group,”Youth and Society, Volume 12 (1981), pp. 277–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Henry Borow, “Development of Occupational Motives and Roles,” in L.W. Hoffman and M.C. Hoffman (eds.),Review of Child Development Research (New York: Russell Sage, 1966), pp. 373–422; Frank M. Howell, Wolfgang Frese and Carlton R. Sollie, “The Measurement of Perceived Opportunity for Occupational Attainment,”Journal of Vocational Behavior, Volume 25 (1984), pp. 325-343; John U. Ogbu,Minority Education and Caste (New York: Academic Press, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sandra C. Stanley and Mady W. Segal, “Military Women in NATO: An Update,”Armed Forces and Society, Volume 14 (1988), pp. 559–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. The President’s Commission on Higher Education, “Higher Education for American Democracy,”Establishing the Goals, Volume I (Washington, D.C., 1947).

  20. Solomon Arbeiter,Research and Development Update Monograph. (New York: The College Board, 1987); J.G. Bachman, L. Sigelman and G. Diamond, “Self-Selection, Socialization, and Distinctive Military Values: Attitudes of High School Seniors,”Armed Forces and Society, Volume 13 (1984), pp. 169-187.

    Google Scholar 

  21. USMC FY87 Military Equal Opportunity Assessment (Washington, D.C.: Headquarters, United States Marine Corps, Document #5534/2, MHE-3, 6 April 1987).

  22. Deidre G. Knapp, Rebecca M. Pliske and Timothy W. Elig,The Computerized Adaptive Screening Test (CAST): An Examination of the Validity and Test Fairness (Alexandria, VA: U.S.Army Research Institute for the Behavior Sciences, Technical Reprint #747, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Leonard A. Marascuilo and Patricia L. Busk, “Loglinear Models: A Way to Study Main Effects and Interactions for Multidimensional Contingency Tables with Categorical Data,”Journal of Counseling Psychology, Volume 34 (1987), pp. 443–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Harold E. Cheatham,Gender and Racial Equity in U.S. Military Occupational Distribution (Patrick Air Force Base, FL: Final Report to Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute, Report #:DEOMI-88-4, Sept. 30, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Borow, as in note 17“; Ogbu, as in note 17.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Frost, as in note 17“; Dorothy D. Nevill and Debra I. Schlecker, “The Relation of Self-Efficacy and Assertiveness to Willingness to Engage in Traditional/Nontraditional Career Activities,Psychology of Women Quarterly, Volume 12 (1988), pp. 91-98. $

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Cheatham, H.E., Seem, S.R. Occupation equity: A black and white portrait of women in the united states military. Rev Black Polit Econ 19, 65–78 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02899932

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02899932

Keywords

Navigation