Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship between questionnaire survey results of vibration complaints of wheelchair users and vibration transmissibility of manual wheelchair

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine Aims and scope

Abstract

Objective

Clarify the relation between the complaints of wheelchair users and the vibration characteristics of the wheelchair, to improve wheelchair comfort and design.

Methods

The question naires were distributed to 33 wheelchair users directly by the experimenter in order to identify the causes of complaints from wheelchair vibrations that they experienced. The vibration transmissibility of wheelchairs of ten subjects was measured to clarify the causes of complaints of wheelchair vibration according to the ISO 10326-1 standard in the laboratory using a broadband random vibration spectrum with a frequency-weighted vibration magnitude of 0.1 ms−2 r.m.s. over the frequency range from 0.2 to 100 Hz. Each vibration exposure lasted 60 seconds.

Results

The following findings were clear from the questionnaire results; (i) the vibration rom the wheelchair affected psychological comfort; (ii) the effects of different riding surfaces were important engineering issues affecting wheelchair ride comfort; (iii) the wheelchair users felt the vibration during wheelchair usage at locations on the neck, lower back and buttocks; (iv) vertical vibration was the most noticeable vibration from the wheelchair to each participant’s body. The following findings were clear from the results of the transmissibility measurement of the wheelchair; (i) the resonance frequency-ranges of the transmissibility of the wheelchair showed significant differences between the subjects; (ii) intra-subject variability from three repeated transmissibility measurements was small; (iii) the first resonant frequency occurred approximately 5 to 7 Hz and the second resonant frequency occurred at around 8 Hz and the third resonant frequency occurred approximately 13 to 15 Hz; (iv) the magnitude of the peak transmissibility varied from 1.3 to 2.6.

Conclusion

From the comparison of the results of questionnaires and the transmissibility measurement of the wheelchair, the resonance frequency-ranges of the maximum vibration transmissibility of the manual wheelchairs were consistent with the frequency-ranges of the body parts of the causes of the complaints of wheelchair users. In addition, from these experimental results, it was suggested that the main point for improving a wheelchair user’s comfort was to reduce the wheelchair seat vibration transmissibility at around 8 Hz and also to design wheelchair stiffness and damping characteristics to minimize vibration transmission at specific frequencies at body locations that caused the discomfort reported by wheelchair users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan. Annual Reports on Health and Welfare 1999. 2000.

  2. Viano D, Andrzejak D. Research Issues on the Biomechanics of Seating Discomfort: An Overview with Focus on Issues of the Elderly and Low-Back Pain. SAE Transactions. #920130. 1992: 122–131.

  3. Matsuoka Y. Vibration analysis and design problems of the vehicles modified with the wheelchair transporting apparatus. KANSEI Engineering International. 2000; 1: 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Terauchi F, Kubo M, Aoki H, Ohtani H. Riding comfort of wheelchair riders in a motor vehicle. Proceedings of the 36th United Kingdom Group Conference on Human Response to Vibration. Centre for Human Sciences, QinetiQ, Farnborough, UK. 12–14 September 2001; 67–74.

  5. Sekiguchi K, Yoshino Y, Momura M, Yokoyama K. Proceedings of 6th JARVI (Japanese Association of Rehabilitation for the Visually Impaired Conference), 1997; 146–149.

  6. Corbridge C, Griffin MJ. Seat dynamics and passenger comfort. Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs. 1989; 203: 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Griffin MJ, Whitham EM. Individual variability and its effect on subjective and biodynamic response to whole-body vibration. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 1978; 58: 239–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. International Organization for Standardization. Mechanical vibration and shock—Guidance on safety aspects of tests and experiments with people—Part 1: Exposure to whole-body mechanical vibration and repeated shock. ISO 13090-1, 1998.

  9. International Organization for Standardization. Mechanical vibration—Laboratory method for evaluating vehicle seat vibration—Part 1: Basic requirements, ISO 10326-1, 1992.

  10. DiGiovine CP, Cooper RA. Analysis of whole-body vibration during manual wheelchair propulsion using ISO standard 2631. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual RESONA Conference. Long Beach, CA, 1999; 242–244.

  11. Japanese Industrial Standard. Vibration Level Meters for Hand Tools. JIS C 1511, 1979.

  12. Griffin MJ. Handbook of human vibration. Academic Press. London 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Whitham EM, Griffin MJ. The effects of vibration frequency and direction on the location of areas of discomfort caused by whole-body vibration. Applied Ergonomics. 1978; 9: 231–239.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kitazaki S, Griffin MJ. A modal analysis of whole-body vertical vibration, using a finite element model of the human body. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 1997; 200: 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to setsuo Maeda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maeda, s., Futatsuka, M., Yonesaki, J. et al. Relationship between questionnaire survey results of vibration complaints of wheelchair users and vibration transmissibility of manual wheelchair. Environ Health Prev Med 8, 82–89 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02897920

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02897920

Key words

Navigation